Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02345-01
Original file (02345-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 234501
13 August 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 August 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER  
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice

334/06371  of 18 June 2001, a

.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
 contained in
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT 

,OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722  INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 380546057

IN REPLY REFER

 

To:

1133
Ser 
18 Jun 0

334/06371

1

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  
(b)  BUPERS  

ltr  1130 Ser  

1130.8F
N132C4/9U97760

 of 18 May 99

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 02345-01

applicant is non prior

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
and (b),
less than 180 consecutive days of prior naval service however
applicant must meet reenlistment code (RE-code) eligibility
requirements.

Access non prior service as  

'service because applicant has

E-3.

Per references (a)

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

2 .
Correction of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.

By ‘direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02861-01

    Original file (02861-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 3203-01

    Original file (3203-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02932-01

    Original file (02932-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Applicant was authorized to reenlist as an Per reference (a), ABH3/E-4 was disapproved This is an advisory memorandum for use by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03856-01

    Original file (03856-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. applicant's request to reenlist as an (21, Per references (a) AME3/E-4 Applicant was This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05159-00

    Original file (05159-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05112-00

    Original file (05112-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. additio?, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by a copy of which is attached. Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02184-01

    Original file (02184-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. applicant was authorized to reenlist as an Per reference (a), CTM2/E-5 was disapproved Applicant's experience gained CTM2/E-5.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02433-01

    Original file (02433-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNE WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 X 0 This is in reference to your application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03002-01

    Original file (03002-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 03002-01 10 Jul 01 00 Per references (a) Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05318-01

    Original file (05318-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. In addition, the Board considered the advisory NAVCRIJITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 334/06482 of 1 October 2001, a After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...