Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01953-01
Original file (01953-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 1953-01
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the  

IJnited States Code, section  

1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 October 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by  
of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

NAVCRl.JITCOM  memorandum  

1 133 Ser  

Your allegations of error and injustice

334iO.144 of 8 May 2001, a copy

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision  
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or

upon submission of new and material

ofticial records. Consequently,

iJl_justice.

 

all 

 

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722 

WEGRITY DR.

MILLlNGlON,lENNESSEE 

38o54-5057

lh( REPLY 

REFERTO:

1133
Ser 
1 

Ott 01

N312/06473

From:
To:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj:

BCNR REQUEST ICO

Ref:

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  
(b) BUPERS  

ltr  1130 Ser  

1130.8F
N132C4/99U97760  of 18 May 99

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 001953-01

Applicant9

roval of enclosure (1).

Recommend disa
(b) ,

1.
from another service after less
and 
than 180 consecutive days of active duty are considered non-prior
service.
Non-prior service applicants are accessed onto active
duty in paygrades E-l through E-3 unless eligible for an advanced
paygrade.

Per references (a)

4

ischarged

2.
Correction of Naval

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

Records

onlv.

Enclosure

(1)

is returned.

By 'direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06326-01

    Original file (06326-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 6326-01 27 November 2001 in reference to your application This is provisions of title IO of the I liiitecl States for correction of your naval (lode, section 1552. record pursuant to the panel three-menlber the applic*ation A of session, considered your injustice were reviewed in accordance with to the proceedings your application, applicable statutes, regulations by opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04034-01

    Original file (04034-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 1 July 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03718-01

    Original file (03718-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03469-01

    Original file (03469-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER In addition, the Board considered the advisory of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01092-01

    Original file (01092-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02406-01

    Original file (02406-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03731-01

    Original file (03731-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. 1966/3 contained in enclosure Per reference (a), (b), Army OSVETs who do not paygrade This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04747-00

    Original file (04747-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4747-00 27 November 2001 This is in reference to provisions of title 10 of the your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the Ilnited States Code, section 1552. opinion furnished by 2001, a copy of which is attached. Non-prior service applicants will access onto active Applicants discharged from another service after less than paygrade E-l...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07437-01

    Original file (07437-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached N32/06521 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01416-01

    Original file (01416-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.