DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 1900-01
30 October 2001
This is in reference to
provisions of title 10 of the
your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
IJnited States Code, section
1552.
30 October 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N
which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
I2 October 2001, a copy of
130D2/0 1
II 1296 of
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
substantiall-y concurred with the comments contained in
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
when applying for a correction of an
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON. O.C. 20350-2000
IN REPLY REFER TO
5420
N130D2/
12
Ott 2001
OlU1296
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
Ref:
(a) DFAS-HQ/FMM Memo of 11 Sep 1995
(b)
DOD Financial Management Regulation (Vol. 7A)
Encl:
(1) BCNR case
file,
#01900-01 with microfiche service record
and recommendation on
Recommend that
2.
recoupment of unearned bonuses, be denied
request for halting of the
\
requests that recoupment of the unearned portion
lted because he claims he was involuntarily
According to
the Navy for a medical condition.
D-214, he was administratively discharged under
(SPD) code of JFX defined as
rogram designator
- not a disability". Reference (a) changed
"personality disorder
reference (b), effective November 1995 to require recoupment of
all unearned bonuses if the member was administratively
discharged from the Navy for personality disorder.
The fact that
4.
has no bearing on the issue of recoupment of bonuses.
regulations, reference (b), an administrative discharge for
personality disorder is specified as a reason for recoupment of
the unearned portion of bonuses.
was discharged, involuntarily,
Under
DOD
BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned
5.
herewith as enclosure (1).
Program Analyst
Enlisted Bonu
Programs Branc
s
,
h
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03597-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 200 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. effective November 1995 to require recoupment of all unearned bonuses if the member was administratively discharged from the Navy for personality disorder. "JFX" defined Reference (a) was administratively as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Jan 26 13_54_43 CST 2001
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. DC 20350-2000 N REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser N13OD/159—99 9 Sep 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (NPC—OOZCB) NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF?~~~~M End: (1) BCNR File #03425-99 with...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00647 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code be changed. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was administratively separated due to an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, and traits of a personality disorder. On...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05290-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. comment and recommendation on former requests the recoupment petition. case was ed portion of N130 recommends denial is not entitled to keep the SRB is a retention incentive paid to enlisted members serving 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07322-98
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:mh Docket No: 7322-98 25 May 1999 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. equests repayment of tive Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) recouped...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07973-07
Documentary material of your application, together with thereof, your naval record and and policies. In ntially concurred with the comments Accordingly, your application has of the members of the panel will be ances of your case are such that You are entitled to have the Board ission of new and material evidence neidired by the Board. He has requested that recoupment of his SRB be stopped.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8226 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 N130D2/14U0995 of 28 July 2014 and OCNO memo 7220 N130D2/14U01313 of 8 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05426-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 5420~ N13 12 ODl/ Aug 2002 H~PLY RLFE~~ IO 02UO438 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION NAVAL RECORDS OF Subj: N THE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05426-02 with microfiche service record llowing provides...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01396-00
D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y S 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser 14 June 2000 N130D/ OuO329 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-OOZCB) Ref: (a) DODINST 1304.22 Encl: (1) BCNR File #01396-00 with microfiche service record The following p.rovides comment and recommendation on former 1. Petty Officer initial enlistment into the Navy was ay she signed an agreement and 3. on 1 June 1987. statement of understanding that by electing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5701 13
Jn your case, the Board agreed with the advisory opinions that, because you did not gain and maintain proficiency in the community and for the NEC that you received the bonus, in the Board’s view, recoupment of the unearned portion of the bonus was appropriate. After reviewing all the circumstances in your case, in the Board’s view, the decision to recoup the unearned portion of the bonus was just, and the half separation pay you received was properly awarded according the Separation...