DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 1914-01
19 July 2001
Your allegations of error and
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 10 January 2000
at age 19.
nonjudicial punishments.
The offenses included theft of cassette
tapes, failure to obey a lawful order on three occasions,
communicating a threat on two
insubordination on four occasions,
occasions, provoking gestures, dereliction of duty, and forgery.
On 17 November 2000 the commanding officer recommended that you
be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of
When informed of the
misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your
case to an administrative discharge board.
After review by the
discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was
approved and on 21 November 2000 you were discharged with an
other than honorable discharge.
reenlistment code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of
The record reflects that you received four
At that time you were assigned a
Since you have been treated no differently than
misconduct.
others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or
injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code.
The names and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service should be changed, since you did not ask for such
consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative
remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04636-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01822-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 The record reflects that you received two nonjudicial The offenses included an unauthorized absence of 18 dicharged with an other than honorable discharge by The names and since you did not ask for such Since you have been treated no differently than reenlistment code when an individual is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05159-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04609-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings -of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04143-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07989-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09809-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. When informed of the recommendation, you elected to On 29 September 2001 At that time, you The offenses included waive the right to present your case to an administrative After review by the discharge authority, the Since you have been treated no differently than the Board could not find an error or The names and Applicable regulations require the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04971-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05238-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 29 November 2000 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07326-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 14 May 1997, you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. On 30 November 2000, you received a psychiatric...