DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No: 2015-01
11 October 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
sittings in executive session,
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records,
application on 10 October 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support
Your allegations of error and
considered your
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
because you expressed suicidal ideation during
you were referred to a mental health care
You enlisted in the Navy on 4 April 2000 at age 27.
Subsequently,
recruit training,
professional.
diagnosed with a personality disorder.
that you had spent a great deal of time requesting assistance in
order to leave recruit training.
your condition adversely affected your potential to perform your
duties and responsibilities,
the Navy.
On 8 May 2000 you were evaluated and were
The evaluation stated
The psychologist believed that
and recommended your separation from
Based on the psychiatric evaluation,
separation from the Navy.
you elected to waive your procedural rights.
separation authority directed an entry level separation by reason
of erroneous enlistment and you were so separated on 17 May 2000.
At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and were
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
In connection with this processing,
you were processed for
Subsequently, the
You state in your application that you wanted to leave recruit
training so that you could solve some personal problems.
You
claim that those problems are now solved and you desire to
reenlist in the military.
Such a code is normally assigned when an individual
Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is separated by reason of erroneous
enlistment.
is separated prior to completing recruit training after being
diagnosed with a personality disorder that interfered with the
ability to perform military duties.
no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not
find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4
reenlistment code.
Since you have been treated
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard,
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
record,
existence of probable material error or injustice.
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
when applying for a correction of an official naval
You are entitled to have the
it is important to keep in mind that a
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02949-01
You state but you asserted that you Subsequently, the Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals, discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. differently than others discharged under similar circumstances, the board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09607-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 20 December 2000 at age 29 after being granted a medical waiver for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02004-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02119-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than others separated for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01863-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 15 May 2000 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. Since you have been treated no differently than others discharged under similar...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06647-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous entry due to the diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02732-01
You were advised of your procedural rights, The discharge The Board Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. Your doctor provides no evidence of his qualifi- cations or a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to support his The Board noted contention or to refute the Navy's diagnosis. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04097-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The psychologist believed that this condition would Thirteen Based on this recommendation, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05022-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. the Navy with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. antisocial personality...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04796-01
(Member) reported heavy Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board concluded that the diagnosed paranoid personality disorder was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.