DEPARTMENT OF
THEI NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC
2037C-5100
CRS
Docket No: 2014-01
7 June 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 22
September 1952 at age
1955 you were convicted by a summary court-martial of an
unauthorized absence of four days.
separated under honorable conditions and transferred to the
Marine Corps Reserve.
The record reflects that on 13 May
On 21 September 1955 you were
17.
Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and
proficiency averages,
both of which are computed from marks
assigned during periodic evaluations.
proficiency averages were 3.9 and 3.6, respectively.
average marks of 4.0 in conduct and 3.8 in proficiency were
required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the
time of your separation.
Your conduct and
Minimum
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
such as your youth and
conclc.ded that these factors were
However, the Board
and since your conduct and
insufficiently high to warrant a fully
The names and votes of the
yoc.r application has been
mefmbers of the panel will be
given your disciplinary action,
proficiency averages were
honorable discharge.
denied.
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances' of your case are such that
Yet. are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant. to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error
Accordingly,
or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04412-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Given the seriousness of your offenses that resulted in five disciplinary actions and your failure to attain the conduct mark average required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00013-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 26 March 1953 you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve at age 17 and began an extended period of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01445-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary action, and since your conduct and proficiency averages were insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable In this regard, there is no evidence of any medical discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09219-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 4 June 1957, you received a third NJP for disorderly conduct, and were awarded reduction to paygrade E-1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01717-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Thereafter, you were separated under honorable conditions totalling 27 days, failure to obey a lawful The record reflects that you received The offenses included Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01503-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07620-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04563-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant upgrading your discharge given the SCM and failure to attain the required average in conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04730-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02265-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2001. injustice were reviewed inaccordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A minimum average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...