Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01956-01
Original file (01956-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj

Docket No: 1956-01
12 June 2001

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record
and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum of 23 April 2001, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in

the advisory opinion. Documentary evidence, such as tax returns, car insurance, property deeds,
etc, must be provided to establish common law marriage. Accordingly, your application has

been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
23 Apr O1

 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

= ot

Ref: (a) BCNR memo of 20 Oct OO s
(b) DoD Financial Management Regulation (Vol 7B)
(c) NPC ltr 5820 PO612/107-1 dtd 17 Apr Ol

1. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct cP 0 -—_eliliigammes
record to reflect that his election under the Survivor Benefit

Plan (SBP) was changed from no beneficiary to spouse coverage.

2. The recommendation is based on the following:

a. CPO ims transferred to the Fleet Reserve on
1 July 1995. He enrolled in SBP spouse and child(ren) coverage
on 1 July 1995. He died 25 October 2000.

b. CPO Be ca SBP category was changed to no beneficiary
on 1 July 1995.

c. CPO @@MiMMmR married Ms. linings on 12 June 2000.
He died on 25 October 2000.

d. Per reference (b), a member who is participating with
spouse or spouse and child coverage and who does not have an
eligible spouse beneficiary may upon remarriage: resume coverage,
increase the level of coverage up to and including full retired
pay, or elect not to have spouse coverage resume. Additionally,

the spouse becomes an eligible beneficiary upon the first
anniversary of the marriage.

3. Mrs. SiBMebas not provided documentary evidence
establishing that she was married to the member for the required
period of time.

 
 

Head, Navy Retired Activities
Branch (PERS-622)

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01855-09

    Original file (01855-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by ‘the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material - error or injustice. Sincerely, Enclosure 30 Jun 09 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01778-04

    Original file (01778-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 6 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In response to reference (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02812-01

    Original file (02812-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 7 September 2001, a copy of which is attached. Senior Chief Petty Officer voluntarily changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03524

    Original file (BC 2014 03524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records show the applicant requested spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 Nov 06 retirement. It is unfortunate that the applicant failed to notify DFAS in a timely manner of his marriage, in order to preclude a debt or to deny SBP coverage for her. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a letter dated 5 Mar 15, he states his spouse provided a letter relinquishing the SBP benefit.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01572

    Original file (BC-2012-01572.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her late husband paid SBP premiums for his former spouse’s SBP coverage from January 1996 to June 2004, even though the former spouse remarried in September 2003 before her 55th birthday. The complete DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRB Legal Advisor, dated 15 Nov 12, Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 Dec 12, w/atch.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000030

    Original file (20120000030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He elected participation in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage based on the full amount under Option C (Immediate coverage). On 15 August 2011, by letter, a DFAS official notified the applicant's Member of Congress that: * Entitlement to retired pay terminates on the date of the retiree's death * The Arrears of Pay (AOP) include unencumbered amounts due to the deceased member * An amount of $752.40 was mailed to the applicant on 1 September 2010 for his AOP from 1 to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07547-06

    Original file (07547-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. VOL 7BDODFMR 430101.Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMt4ENDATIONS IN CASE OF Issue : Whether law or equity dictates correction ofdecedent’s records to reflect election of former spouse SBP coverage?

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0102112

    Original file (0102112.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At that time, RCSBP coverage and premiums were suspended. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states that SBP spouse coverage is suspended when the spouse loses eligibility. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006415

    Original file (20080006415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Memorandum, dated 17 November 1988. c. DD Form 1883, dated 7 January 1989. d. Certificate of Marriage, dated 2 August 2000. e. Miscellaneous letters and Designation of Beneficiary Forms from the New York State Police and Fire Retirement System. This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Even if the FSM had been able to enroll the...

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2011-041

    Original file (2011-041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

     If Option A is elected at time of 20 year satisfactory service letter, and spouse concurs, member will have an opportunity to elect into the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) at age 60. (B) Reserve-component annuity participants.--A person who (i) is eligible to participate in the Plan under paragraph (1)(B), and (ii) is married or has a dependent child when he is notified under section 12731(d) of this title that he has completed the years of 2 Pub. § 1448(a)(5), entitled “Participation by...