Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01923-00
Original file (01923-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 203704100

TJR
Docket No: 1923-00
28 August 2000

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

OF RECORD

Ref: (a)

10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1)
(2)
(3)

DD Form 149 with attachments
Case summary
Subject's naval record

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
characterization of his discharge be changed.

The Board, consisting of Ms. Hare, Ms. Madison, and Mr.

2.
Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 22 August 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record.
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

Documentary material

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in a

timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statue of limitations and review the application on its merits.

C .

Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 1 July 1981 at

age of 19 and served for nearly two years without incident.
However, during the period from 2 June 1983 to 18 January 1984 he
received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on three occasions for
three periods of absence from his appointed place of duty and two
periods of unauthorized absence (UA)  

totalling seven days.

d.

Petitioner was subsequently processed for an other than

honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, although the
discharge processing documentation is not in the record.
On 24
February 1984 Petitioner was discharged and issued a Certificate
  a
of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) with
"general under other than honorable" characterization of service.

e.

On 11 December  

I984 a correction to Petitioner's DD Form
214, DD Form 215, was issued correcting his character of service
to other than honorable.

f.

It appears that Petitioner did not receive the DD Form 215

because in his application for correction of his record, he
requests that the Board upgrade his general discharge to fully
honorable.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.

The Board's finding is based on Petitioner's youth and
immaturity, and the nature of his misconduct.
In this regard,
the Board does not condone Petitioner's misconduct, but notes his
infractions consisted primarily of very minor periods of UA.

The Board additionally notes  
Petitioner;& youth and immaturity,
and that he served for two years with no misconduct.
Based on
the foregoing, and considering the fact Petitioner has suffered
the consequences of an other than honorable discharge for nearly
15 years, the Board concludes that no useful purpose is served by
continuing to characterize Petitioner's service as having been
under other than honorable conditions, and recharacterization to
a general discharge is appropriate.

In view of the foregoing,
injustice warranting the following corrective action.

the Board finds the existence of an

RECOMMENDATION:

a.

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he was issued a general discharge under honorable conditions on
24 February 1984 vice the other than honorable discharge actually
issued on that date.

b.

That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in

Petitioner's naval record.

C .

That, upon request, the Veterans Administration be

informed that Petitioner's application was received by the Board
on 13 March 2000.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations,
complete record   of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

and that the foregoing is a true and

ROBERT D.  
Recorder

ZSALMAN

dg

G&SMIT --

Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Na

Executive D



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05979-02

    Original file (05979-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of separation that the discharge under other than honorable conditions issued on 27 August 1984. The majority also believes that although frequent, Petitioner's disciplinary actions were relatively minor. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10569-06

    Original file (10569-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 10569-06 17 July 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF 3_gyieinsiaiiiiieigialaamia Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02341-01

    Original file (02341-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2341-01 10 August 2001 From: To: Subj: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge and reenlistment code than the other than honorable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01485-02

    Original file (01485-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed. Although the Board does not condone Based on the foregoing, and considering the fact Petitioner has suffered the consequences of a BCD for nearly 60 years, the Board concludes that no useful purpose is served by continuing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04365-02

    Original file (04365-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, the son of a deceased former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that Subject1 s undesirable discharge be recharacterized to honorable. It appears that the DIO memorandum finally "caught upn to Subject because, on 24 July 1945, the CO requested authority to discharge Subject by reason of unfitness, noting Subject's alleged communistic activities and disciplinary infractions. Furthermore, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00626-05

    Original file (00626-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 626-05 24 October 2005 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF ~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Shortly after the conviction by SPCM, on 31 July 1960, Petitioner received adverse marks of 1.0 and 3.4 in conduct and proficiency, respectively. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03187-12

    Original file (03187-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7001S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade of his other than honorable (OTH) discharge, that was issued on 25 August 1970, to a general characterization of service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gorenflo, Lippolis and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2013...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03437-06

    Original file (03437-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Moreover, Petitioner’s pattern of misconduct including both relatively minor and more severe offenses continued throughout his period of service. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an upgrade of his other than honorable discharge.2 The Board, consisting and Mr., reviewed Petitioner’allegations o error and injustice on 12 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5601 13

    Original file (NR5601 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also states that after returning from RVN he had a hard time adjusting which subsequently led to his periods of UA. MAJORITY CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, a majority of the Board, consisting of Mr. Grover and Ms. Trucco, concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable action. While the majority does not condone Petitioner's periods of UA while on active duty, it notes his youth, nearly two year period of satisfactory service,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR13255 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR13255 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TUR Docket No: 13255-14 19 February 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW a RECORD OF EX-SN Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 (bo) SECDEF Memorandum, “Supplemental Guidance to Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records Considering Discharge Upgrade Requests by Veterans Claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder”...