NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05753-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. As such, on 21 September 1955, the DD was mitigated to a bad conduct discharge (BCD) and the confinement was reduced to 20 months.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05760-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05762-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural rights, the discharge authority directed your commanding officer to issue you an other than honorable discharge by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05765-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural rights, the discharge authority directed your commanding officer to issue you an other than honorable discharge by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05767-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on i8 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 4 February 1992 you were again convicted by SCM of a 28 day period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05793-09
The Board did not consider your request for correction of your reentry code, as that request was previously denied, and you have not submitted any new material evidence concerning that request. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05798-98
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Based on the psychiatric evaluation you were processed for discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05841-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of separation than the under honorable conditions separation issued on 1 June 1997. g* In a case such as Petitioner's, character of service must be based on conduct and overall trait averages, both of which are computed from marks assigned during periodic...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05852-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Quarters (BAQ) and Variable Housing Allowance (VHA) at the with dependent rate. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Mazza, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05889-98
5889-98 19 April 1999 Dear &$;:;: This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05906-97
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 1999. 901 M STREET SE WASHINGTON, DC 20374-5023 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser: 23 Mar 99 99-029 Director, Chairman, Naval Council of Personnel Boards Board for Correction of Naval Records COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER (a) BCNR ltr JRE DN: (b) SECNAVINST (c) CMDR 1850.4C gist, dated 7 Apr 98 5906-97 dated 30 Jun...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05912-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 1999 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. were so separated on 7 April 1998. recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05958-97
1552' (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, be corrected by changing the reason for discharge or, in the alternative, that the record be corrected to show that the unearned portion of his Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) was not recouped. portion of my...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05967-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to the payment of Lump Sum Leave (LSL) (60 days). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and allegations of error and injustice on 30 March 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05969-99
CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (3), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting limited relief, specifically, removal of Petitioner's failure of selection for promotion The Board finds that Petitioner's request for a special selection board should be denied. DEPARTMENT OF T H E NAVY H E A D Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D STATES M A R I N E CORPS 3 2 8 0 R U S S E L L ROAD QUANTICO, V I R...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05990-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 14 February 1994, the Record Review Panel of the Physical Evaluation Board made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty because of your back condition, which it rated at 20% under VA code 5295, as lumbosacral strain. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06005-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06046-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In finding that the reporting senior ’s letter to your physical evaluation board did not contradict the contested fitness report, they noted that he expressly acknowledged, in the report, that the “problem” he cited “has not prevented [you] from continuing to carry out [your] routine medical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06056-99
Your allegations of error and injustice with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the material considered by the Board consisted of your in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory by BUPERS memorandum 5420 SER 812/9U830 of 7 December 1999, a copy d conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or the Board substantially concurred...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06073-99
( 2 ) , t h e B o a r d f i n d s t h e e x i s t e n c e o f a n f o l l o w i n g c o r r e c t i v e a c t i o n . ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06087-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06116-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3G reenlistment code is the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to diagnosed personality disorders. that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06138-99
the Board believes that if Given the circumstances, had understood his situation he would have qualified Therefore, the Board concludes that the record It is clear that Petitioner The best way to accomplish this action is to correct the two year 3 enlistment in the Regular Navy of 23 December 1975 to show that The record should it was an enlistment in the Naval Reserve. With these corrections, years of qualifying service in the reserve component, will have 20 qualifying years for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06139-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06145-98
CoTection of Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member panel of the Board for session, considered your application on 13 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06172-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a period of leave as non-chargeable convalescent leave vice accrued leave. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06181-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 1999. On 20 January 1998 the separation Regulations require the assignment of an when an individual is separated because of entry level RR-4 reenlistment code performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06184-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06214-99
6214-99 18 February 2000 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF gail Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06265-98
advanced to SK3 (E-4) on 16 June 1977. enlistment, you completed an alcohol rehabilitation program. The performance evaluation for the period 19 On 11 September 1981 you were again counseled concerning your abuse of alcohol. days later your recommendation for advancement was formally withdrawn because of a lack of professional and military skills and alcohol abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06267-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06273-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06290-98
On 28 February 1996 the discharge authority directed On 5 March 1996 you were The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully considered all mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, and your contention that you would like your reenlistment code changed so that you may reenlist. an individual separated by reason of misconduct must receive an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06347-99
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) (3) Subject ’s naval record NAVCRUCOM memorandum 1133 SER 3434/06133 of 11 January 2000 Pursuant to the provisions of reference 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher number of college credit hours. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06404-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Such an act is sufficient under current standards to warrant an other than honorable discharge, since such a characterization is authorized if an individual commits a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06422-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 1999. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were entitled to a disability rating of 30% or higher at the time of your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06449-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. N130 recommends den petition regarding an $l,dOO for the Aviation ntered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on the guarantees of AE A-school and EB for s In his petition, duty...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06467-98
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director I Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY htdKIUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, D.C....
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06491-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend disapproval of - Petitioner reenlisted on 20 Sep 99 for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06500-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06523-98
Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 6523-98 1 April 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06531-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The bad conduct discharge was issued on 20 May 1960. forfeiture of all pay and allowances, The court sentence you to Tn its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, limited education, low score on the aptitude test and your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06533-97
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 JRE Docket No: 6533-97 21 May 1999 From: Chairman, To: Secretary of the Navy Board for Correction of Naval Records Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C: 1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 OphthSpecAdv ltr, 29 Apr 99 Subject’s naval record 1. The Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06534-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 1995 the earliest petitioner was eligible to receive the SRB entitlement was 26 Jul...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06536-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Temporary Additional Duty (TAD) orders to New Jersey were modified to include accounting funds for the TAD and travel pay and per diem was authorized for the period of the TAD 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06559-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06564-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in of college credit hours. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Mathews, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 February 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06575-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06590-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06593-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting im executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...