NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 16_05_57 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 16_46_23 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 28 September 1999 3638-99 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj Ref: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF juu.turar (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 16_58_29 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Therefore, Warrant Officer Colemon did not warrant Marines in receipt of permanent change Staff Sergeant Lamie, the Marine 3. asserts was given preferential treatment, was approved for early reenlistment because he was complying with orders to recruiting duty. reenlistment in 1991. meet the requirements for an early reenlistment and his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 17_02_08 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 17_42_33 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 28 September 1999 3638-99 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj Ref: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF juu.turar (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 17_54_01 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Therefore, Warrant Officer Colemon did not warrant Marines in receipt of permanent change Staff Sergeant Lamie, the Marine 3. asserts was given preferential treatment, was approved for early reenlistment because he was complying with orders to recruiting duty. reenlistment in 1991. meet the requirements for an early reenlistment and his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 17_57_40 CST 2001
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Oct 03 09_03_39 CDT 2000
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Oct 03 09_50_55 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Oct 03 10_03_30 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Dec 27 11_00_21 CST 2000
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has modified your contested fitness report for 15 May 1997 to 4 January 1998 by correcting the beginning date from 15 May to 8 March 1997. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 1999. They noted that your fitness report at issue is not an “extended” report, in that it does not reflect that your evaluation in a prior report remained valid.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 14 13_12_37 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 3381-99 8 November 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF fflj JIIJWiJOL~~j11*ft. Secretary of the Navy - Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 14 13_34_15 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL. He noted that He The Board specifically noted In its review of your application the Board conducted a thorough review of both service and medical records, and the post-service medical records you provided. The Board also could not ignore the multiple notations With regard to your psychiatrist’s opinion that you suffered from PTSD, a paranoid personality disorder and a possible organic brain syndrome, the Board noted that like the other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 14 14_01_05 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL. He noted that He The Board specifically noted In its review of your application the Board conducted a thorough review of both service and medical records, and the post-service medical records you provided. The Board also could not ignore the multiple notations With regard to your psychiatrist’s opinion that you suffered from PTSD, a paranoid personality disorder and a possible organic brain syndrome, the Board noted that like the other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 14 16_52_11 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 44 15-99 13 October 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Flood, and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 October 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 21 10_32_11 CST 2001
1552 End: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 16 Feb 00 (2) PERS-85 memo undtd (3) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removal of his failure of selection for promotion before the Fiscal Year (FY) 00 Line Commander Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board next convened to consider officers of his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 28 08_56_15 CST 2001
1552 End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC Memo Pers 913 of 15 Jan 00 (3) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60. RTB program, as they apply to this case, allow retirement with eligibility for pay at age 60 for individuals...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 28 08_57_48 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001
i DSN Copy to: 21, 40) By direction o 703 614 9857.~2/ 2 .,~ 1920 PERS-911 ~7 JUN )999 SENT BY : IJSAED-CELMS-ED 7- 7-93 ;10:45AM COftS OF ENGINEERS— DEPARTMENT OF TH1 NAVY NAVY PISIONNIL COMMAND 17*0 ENTIOIITY DRIVI MILUNCTON TN 31055-0000 Comrnanc Personnel C From: To: Via: Subj: YOUR STATUS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1920.6A (b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1740.1 Per reference (a), an officer in the permanent grade of 1. lieutenant who has twice failed of selection for promotion to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_30_40 CST 2001
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Nov 01 15_20_20 CST 2000
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 2294-99 5 October 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Nov 29 10_04_19 CST 2000
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 12 April 1999, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure .1 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Nov 29 10_27_21 CST 2000
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 0261. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Goldsmith, and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Nov 29 10_41_08 CST 2000
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Variable Housing Allowance (VHA) at the single rate. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Nov 29 14_53_31 CST 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 1999. In addition, the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting restoration of your drill instructor military occupational specialty (MOS) or your special duty assignment (SDA) pay. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 11 14_07_47 CDT 2000
Petitioner’s three—member Administrative Discharge Board sat from 7 to 8 December, found unanimously that the allegation of drug use was substantiated, and recommended separation with a general (under On 15 October, the Attorney Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR),_APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF (FORMER) GUNNERY SERGEANT~!J~t~~J ~ S. MARINE CORPS honorable) characterization of service. Petitioner was 7~q~97 b. Board for Correction reviE-iof ~ the administrative recommended in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 18 08_15_11 CDT 2000
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in paygrade E4 vice E3. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Mathews, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 18 09_39_10 CDT 2000
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for six months, forfeitures of $44 per month for six months, and a bad conduct discharge. duty and requested execution of the bad conduct discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 18 09_48_14 CDT 2000
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2NAWANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 3329-99 3 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: SGT~ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ~ USMCR,1 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 18 12_56_13 CDT 2000
In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC Promotion Branch (MMPR) has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s implied request to remove his failures of selection has merit and warrants favorable action, since the GCM documentation was not removed until after he had failed by the FY 1999 CWO-3 Selection Board. Warrant Office~~ request the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) to remove his failures of selection for the FY97 and FY99 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Selection...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_38_33 CDT 2000
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:tj Docket No: 1237-99 24 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ~~~IEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Mimer, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 August 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_39_56 CDT 2000
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to paygrade E3 besed on the completion of the required number of college credit hours. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Milner, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 August 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_49_23 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. not all applicants are offered the NCF Program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_51_25 CDT 2000
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 11_19_19 CDT 2000
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 9 October 1981 you were separated under honorable conditions and transferred to the Naval Reserve. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 11_21_00 CDT 2000
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 12_47_11 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Rissmiller requests the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) amend his enlistment contract to allow him an ED for the NF Program. Seaman Rissmiller does not have an ED contract in his EB is budgeted based on quotas Every recruit is not offered nor receives an BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned 5. herewith as enclosure...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 12_48_24 CDT 2000
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1133 Ser 3423/06393 of 5 August 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 13_22_10 CDT 2000
PERS-85 has advised that his projected promotion date, if his petition is approved, is 1 December 1999. d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), PERS-822, the NPC office with cognizance over officer retirements, also recommended approval of Petitioner’s request to remove his name from the retired list, return him to the active duty list, and allow his promotion to captain to proceed as scheduled. That PERS-85 be notified of this action, so that Petitioner’s promotion pursuant to his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 27 14_13_53 CDT 2000
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 27 14_25_51 CDT 2000
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has modified the contested report by changing the mark in item 14a (“endurance”) from “above average” to “not observed.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...