Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06056-99
Original file (06056-99.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 203704100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 6056-99
19 January 

2ooO

This is in refer
provisions of

ce to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive

ed your application on 19 January 2000. Your allegations of error and injustice

with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
material considered by the Board consisted of your
in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory

by BUPERS memorandum 5420 SER 

812/9U830  of 7 December 1999, a copy

d conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or

the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in

your application has been denied. The names and votes of

upon request.

the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
r matter not previously considered by the Board.
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,

In this regard, it is important

a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to

existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

dEPARTMENT  OF THE NAVY

NAVY 
YILLINDTON  TN 

PLRSOWNEL
 COMMAND
INTIQRITY  DRIV E
38055-0000

5720 

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

5420
Ser 
7 

Dee 99

812/9U830

Subj:

Ref:

BCNR PETITION ICO
530-70-4136

--_

m---

(a) NPC Memo 5420
(b) SNM'S DD Form
(c) NAVPERS  

PERS-OOZB of 23 Nov 99
149 of 16 Sep 99

15909F, Enlisted TRANSMAN; Chapter 21

Encl:

.(l) General Assignment Recall Routing Form
(2) NAVPERS 

1070/613  Administrative Remarks

Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations in

1.
response to reference (b).

equested a general assignment recall IAW
3 April 1999.

Her request was routed with
(2).to the Enlisted Community Manager, the Gunner's

2.
ref
enclosure 
Mate Detailer, and the Enlisted assignment's director for
review and consideration of approval.
comments section of the routing form, the population of the
GMCS community exceeds end-strength which lowers advancement
There was no support
opportunity for the entire population.
to approve her request unless she agreed to an administrative
reduction in  
as counseled by
her detailer,
of PERS-812
concerning end-strength issue and agreed to the reduction in
paygrade.
acknowledgement and consent to the reduction.

Enclosure (2) is forwarded as documentation of her

paygrade  to 
E-
GMCM(SW)  Zino,

As shown on the

Regrettably, due to the population of her rating, she

3.
would not have been recalled as a senior chief petty officer.
It is not recommended that she be administratively advanced.
The option of a reduction in rate is mutually beneficial to
the Navy and to the reservist who would otherwise not be
recalled to 

a%tive duty.

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07022-02

    Original file (07022-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), the following recommendation and comments are...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01576-02

    Original file (01576-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Jan 26 13_54_43 CST 2001

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. DC 20350-2000 N REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser N13OD/159—99 9 Sep 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (NPC—OOZCB) NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF?~~~~M End: (1) BCNR File #03425-99 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9806586

    Original file (NC9806586.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subject member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and or remove injustices in the service record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03134-02

    Original file (03134-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2003. Reference (a) regarding former LC retirement rank to Former LCD requested comments and recommendations equest for restoration of his stment of his retirement pay. k As this fact will never The action requested by the petitioner should be denied 3. because these issues were considered by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy when his retirement was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06586-98

    Original file (06586-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WAVY P E R I O W W U C O Y Y A N D 5720 IWTE9RWY DRIVE MILLIWOTON I N 38055-0000 1830 Pers823 Ser 45 1 1 Jun 1999 Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO - Ref: (a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 3 1 March 1999 NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record MEMORANDUM...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02907-99

    Original file (02907-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A threemember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Original record indicates HT3-signed was aware that his request to enlist in paygrade E5 was disapproved due to being overmanned at the E5 paygrade and he acknowledge that his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Jan 30 13_41_54 CST 2001

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of commander she would have been assigned had she been confirmed in the expected time for an officer selected by the Fiscal Year 98 Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Caron, Hogue and Neuschafer reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00193-99

    Original file (00193-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. - Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 20 Mar 1998 reflect a STAR reenlistment and the automatic advancement benefit under the STAR program for the AN/BQQ-SE Advanced Maintenance and Operations Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT. (l), the STS rating had no schools on the CSL at - Per enclosure However, in reference (b)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04197-01

    Original file (04197-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. THE $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF A GTEP 2. WITH COMMAND INVOLVEMENT VIA GTEP RECRUITS SHOULD RETURN TO WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE...