Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06087-98
Original file (06087-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON. 

DC. 203704100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 6087-98
23 February 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section  1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1000 
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

NPC-312/05 of 25 January 1999, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF 

THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
IWTEQRITY  DRIVE
MILLINCTUN TN 3805 5-0000

5720 

From:
To:
Via:

Subj:

Ref:

REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF HOME OF RECORD

(a) Your Request of 17 Aug 
(b) MILPERSMAN   1000-100

98

1000
NPC-312X/05
;2;5 JAN 

mgg

Kunia

Reference (a) is disapproved.

1.
* 
support the fact that La Union; Republic of Philippines
home of record at the time you reported for active duty.
shows Honolulu, Hawaii.

Your service record does not

.

 

waTtyour

Records show that you entered the United States on 3 March

2.
1979 in Honolulu, Hawaii,
from April 1979 to October 1979.
3.
ensure that service members receive travel and transportation
allowances or other compensations provided by law.

the home of record is established to

Per reference (b),

and were employed in the United States

PERS OOZ



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08353-98

    Original file (08353-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC letter 1000 attached. Records show that you entered the United States on 1980 in Honolulu, Hawaii, from March 1980 till the time you reported for active duty.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05523-02

    Original file (05523-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07040-98

    Original file (07040-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03264-98

    Original file (03264-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1000 which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04946-07

    Original file (04946-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    4946—07 28 Aug 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07177-05

    Original file (07177-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06184-98

    Original file (06184-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01609-98

    Original file (01609-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 31 December 1998, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07037-01

    Original file (07037-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. than 139 days, station, Officer-Active Duty for Special Work (ADSW) orders were for a period of 90 days commencing 15 November 1999, as requested by reference (d). The gaining command provided for Petty-travel when the member resides more than 50 miles from the duty (c) stipulates that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07408-09

    Original file (07408-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.