Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06559-98
Original file (06559-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5100

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 6559-98
23 February 1999

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER 
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

852/010 of 12 January 1999, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

WAVY  PERSONNEL COMMAND
IWTEDRITY  DRIVE
MILLINDTON  TN 
28055-0000

5720 

143 0
Ser 
12 Jan 99

852/010

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

NPC/BCNR COORDINATOR, NPC-OOXCB

Subj:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF

Ref:

Encl:

(a) BUPERSINST 

1430.16D

(1) BCNR file  

#06559-98

Per reference (a), Naval Reserve members who report to

1.
active duty may be authorized advancement as a result of
participation in an Inactive Naval Reserve Advancement
However, the member must be in a
Examination Cycle.
selectee status and their final multiple score (FMS) must be
equal to or greater than the FMS for the corresponding
active duty advancement examination cycle.

Therefore, no



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00858-99

    Original file (00858-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07390-98

    Original file (07390-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08627-98

    Original file (08627-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ;ill material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. If a member is denied an opportunity to participate in a Navywide examination and if selected for advancement through participation in a subsequent examination, a member may request a backdated advancement. Therefore, no relief is recommended in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808627

    Original file (NC9808627.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1430 Ser 852/210 of 10 June 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06184-98

    Original file (06184-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04472-05

    Original file (04472-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memorandum 1430 481lE9/525, 17 August 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08079-98

    Original file (08079-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08372-98

    Original file (08372-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser is attached. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 852/ 125 of 16 March 1999, a copy of which After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05354-98

    Original file (05354-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07542-98

    Original file (07542-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum which is attached. Consequently, to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. School for rating conversion may participate in advancement examinations for their present rating, if otherwise qualified, until the class convening date.