DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2
NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No:
6 May 1999
6181-98
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 May 1999.
Your allegations of error and
*injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
On 2 January 1998 you were referred to the recruit
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30 October 1997
at age 26.
evaluation unit because you had expressed an intent to buy a gun
so you could kill a chief petty officer and because your
"hard
card" documented repeated difficulties involving a weapon, angry
outbursts and threats of harming others.
A Navy psychologis t
made a diagnosis of adjustment disorder with a mixed disturbance
of conduct and emotions with homicidal ideations.
He believed
that you were a continuing danger to yourself and others and
recommended an expeditious administrative separation due to your
inability to adjust to recruit training and your uncontrollable
anger outbursts.
Based on your inability to adjust to recruit training you were
processed for and entry level separation by reason of entry level
performance and conduct.
authority directed an entry level separation.
Although the DD
Form 214 is not in the record, you state that you were separated
on 26 January 1998.
On 20 January 1998 the separation
Regulations require the assignment of an
when an individual is separated because of entry level
RR-4 reenlistment code
performance and conduct.
is routinely assigned when there is a finding that an individual
is at risk to harm himself or others.
treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board
could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the
4 reenlistment code.
In addition, an RE-4 reenlistment code
Since you have been
RE-
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
The names and
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
are such that
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02469-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. The record reflects that on 30 June 1998 you were referred to a mental health unit because of suicidal ideation, inability to tolerate authority, and a prior undisclosed history of psychiatric treatment. Separation by erroneous entry is authorized when an enlistment would not have occurred if a disqualifying factor had been known prior to enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02399-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00574-01
A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07178-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Therefore, given your pre-service suicidal ideation and threat to kill yourself while at recruit training, and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00430-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You claimed recurrent suicidal ideation since arriving at recruit training and stabbed yourself because "Nobody would listen to me...now they are listening."
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08401-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 6 May 1998 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed dysthymia and conduct disorders. Further, an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized when a Sailor is separated by reason of erroneous entry due to psychological...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 13_06_57 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 10 August 1998 you received an You were advised of You declined to consult with counsel and Thereafter, the discharge authority Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE—4 reenlistment code to individuals separated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02732-01
You were advised of your procedural rights, The discharge The Board Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of erroneous entry. Your doctor provides no evidence of his qualifi- cations or a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to support his The Board noted contention or to refute the Navy's diagnosis. 2 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06296-01
separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no The error or injustice in your assignment reenlistment code. to that board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06098-01
evaluated by a Navy Psychologist and recommended for separation from the Marine Corps basic training due to failure to adapt. An entry level separation and problems related to You were diagnosed with a On 9 June 1999 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of convenience of the government due to defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosed personality disorder. You were so discharged on 17 June 1999...