Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06139-99
Original file (06139-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 6139-99
27 January 2000

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 January 2000. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1145 SER 814/9U0166 of 13 December 1999, a
copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN REPLY REFER TO
1145

Ser 814/9U0166
13 Dec 99

 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
RECORDS

Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS -00XCB)

 

Encl: (1) BCNR docket #06139-99 w/fiche service record

 
 

titieX (SPONSE to enclosure (1), after careful review of
iii netition, I disagree. Enlisted Master File sho

2000, not March 2000. Enclosure (1) is returned.

 
 

2. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for

Correction of Naval Records only.
Qarlre heb

DARLENE MCIVER .
Section Head, Reenlistment

Management Branch

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02137-98

    Original file (02137-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03597-01

    Original file (03597-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 200 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. effective November 1995 to require recoupment of all unearned bonuses if the member was administratively discharged from the Navy for personality disorder. "JFX" defined Reference (a) was administratively as...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05475-02

    Original file (05475-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03390-99

    Original file (03390-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER copy of which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 Y IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 20 DEC 99 N130C3/220- -99 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02404-01

    Original file (02404-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Fri Jan 26 13_54_43 CST 2001

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. DC 20350-2000 N REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser N13OD/159—99 9 Sep 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (NPC—OOZCB) NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF?~~~~M End: (1) BCNR File #03425-99 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808786

    Original file (NC9808786.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04537-98

    Original file (04537-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 SER which is attached. DC 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 Ser 29 JAN 99 2 04hi4-99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: 0 E OF Encl: (1) BCNR File #04537-98 with microfiche service record ides comments and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05619-99

    Original file (05619-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01109-99

    Original file (01109-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlisted for four (4) years and authorize payment of Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Goldsmith, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...