Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
MEH:mh
Docket No: 6534-98
25 May 1999
SN
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 May 1999.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 4 November 1998, a copy of
which is attached
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
biPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN
2805 S-0000
1160
PERS-815
04 Nov 98
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
Via:
Pers-OOXCB
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO A02
USN,
Ref:
Db Form 149 dtd 27 May 98
SNM's
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) NAVADMIN
013/95
122/95
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval to
- Petitioner requests to review his zone "A" SRB eligibility
from February through July 1995 for the
time frame petitioner's EAOS was 26 Aug 1995.
A0 rate.
During the this
- Per reference (b),
released on 20 Jan 1995 carried a zone
"A" SRB for the
A0 rate at award level 1.5.
- Per reference (c),
date of 10 Jul 1995, deleted the
list.
released on 02 Jun 1995 with effective
A0 rate from the SRB entitlement
the early reenlistment window
Petitioner's EAOS was 26 Aug
- Per references (b) and (c),
remains within one month of EAOS.
1995 the earliest petitioner was eligible to receive the SRB
entitlement was 26 Jul 1995 and the
effective 10 Jul 1995.
receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement.
2.
is.
In view of the above,
Therefore, petitioner is not eligible to
recommend petitioner's record remain as
A0 SRB eligibility was dropped
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by
Enclosure
3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
(1) is returned.
Section Head,
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03533-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner reenlisted on 18 Jun 1998 for 4 years and received the maximum zone "B" SRB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02246-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, reference (b) was in effect at the time petitioner requests to effect the reenlistment date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00381-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 11 Jul 99. petitioner reenlisted there were no SRB entitlements for the DK(0000) rating per reference (b). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, per reference (c), the zone e. The petitioner requests to backdate the three year reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03370-99
Documentary material consider by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support t ereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference b) did not carry a zone "C" SRB entitlement for the AT(0000) ate at the time petitioner reenlisted. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenl stment date of 06 Mar 98 and effect a reenlistment on 01 May 99 nd receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement in reference (c) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03289-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner requests to expunge the reenlistment date of 14 Apr 1999 to effect a reenlistment within the SRB eligible window of reference (c) and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...