Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04631
Original file (BC-2012-04631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04631 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The recoupment of the $47,742.00 severance payment he received 
in 1993 be waived. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was not provided the opportunity to make the election to 
transfer into the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) 
and was therefore discharged from the Temporary Disability 
Retired List (TDRL) with severance pay. It has been 19 years 
since he received severance pay, which has been spent. He was 
not made aware of the error until 2010. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of 
electronic communiqués, AFBCMR BC-2011-00291 documents, Special 
Order number ACD-BCMR-001, a fax from his congressman and 
various other documents associated with this request. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

In 2009/2010, the applicant submitted a DD Form 149, Application 
for Correction of Military Records, requesting that his removal 
from the TDRL and his discharge with severance pay be set aside 
and that his records reflect that he elected to be placed on the 
ISLRS to accept 20 year reserve retirement at age 60. 

 

On 29 March 2010, AFPC/DPSD prepared an advisory recommending 
approval of the applicant’s request to elect transfer into the 
ISLRS effective 10 July 1993 and also recommended recoupment of 
his $47,742.00 disability severance pay. 

 

On 26 August 2011, the AFBCMR granted the applicant’s request 
that he be removed from the TDRL and his discharge with 
severance pay effective, 10 July 1993, be set aside and reflect 
that he elected to be placed on the ISLRS to accept his 20 year 
Reserve retirement at age 60. It was also directed that his 
$47,742.00 disability severance pay be recouped. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 


 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

DFAS-JBJE/CL recommends denial. JBJE/CL states that on 
29 January 1992, the applicant was released from active service 
and placed on the TDRL. On 30 June 1993, he was removed from 
the TDRL effective 10 July 1993, with entitlement to disability 
severance pay. 

 

Air National Guard members who have twenty years of satisfactory 
service and receive a recommendation of discharge with severance 
pay are afforded the opportunity to either elect transfer into 
the ISLRS and retire at age 60 with a reserve retirement, or 
accept the severance pay. The Board reviewed the member's 
personnel record and it appeared that he was not provided the 
opportunity to make the election to transfer into the ISLRS and 
was therefore discharged from the TDRL with severance pay. His 
records were changed to show that on 10 July 1993, he exercised 
his option under Title 10, U.S.C. 12732 to transfer to the ISLRS 
in lieu of being entitled to receive disability severance pay. 

 

In accordance with Title 10, U.S.C. § 1174(h)(l) and 
§1174(h)(2), a member who has received separation pay under this 
section, or separation pay, severance pay, or readjustment pay 
under any other provision of law, based on service in the armed 
forces, and who later qualifies for retired or retainer pay 
under this title or Title 14 shall have deducted from each 
payment of such retired or retainer pay an amount, in such 
schedule of monthly installments as the Secretary of Defense 
shall specify, taking into account the financial ability of the 
member to pay and avoiding the imposition of undue financial 
hardship on the member and member's dependents, until the total 
amount deducted is equal to the amount of separation pay, 
severance pay, and readjustment pay so paid. The severance 
payment that he was entitled to receive was legal and proper 
when payment was made. Considering the law and that the 
payment, when made, was legal and proper, JBJE/CL recommends 
that the request for waiver of the recoupment of his severance 
pay not be approved. 

 

The complete JBJE/CL evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 5 November 2012, a copy of the DFAS evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the applicant’s 
complete submission, we are not persuaded that relief of his 
indebtedness to the government is warranted. Therefore, we agree 
with the opinion and recommendation of DFAS and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Absent persuasive 
evidence that he was denied rights to which he was entitled, we 
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 2 July 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-04631: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 May 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 


 Exhibit C. Letter, DFAS-JBJE/CL, dated 25 October 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 November 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016409

    Original file (20140016409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the remaining portion of separation pay he received in 1988 not be recouped. Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to direct or recommend changes in military records to correct the error or injustice, if persuaded that material error or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014019

    Original file (20060014019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he received severance pay in 1990 and he was retired by reason of physical disability on 26 January 2006. While the Board understands the applicant’s concerns, recoupment of separation/severance pay when an individual later qualifies for retired pay or disability compensation is a requirement of law. DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION (DENY) REVIEW AUTHORITY ISSUES 1.128.0800 291/SEV PAY 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010970

    Original file (20090010970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the separation pay he received in 1983 not be recouped. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 15 November 1983 for "failure of selection for permanent promotion" and he received lump-sum separation pay in the amount of $30,000.00. Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001588

    Original file (20140001588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) withheld $15,588.84 from her disability pay because of the amount of separation pay on file at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) * the amount of separation pay on record is incorrect * she believes the amount of money paid to her for unused accrued leave was arbitrarily combined with her separation pay and is in error * she does not recall receiving $15,588.84 and this amount plus money for her unused leave...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088901C070403

    Original file (2003088901C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That his pay was garnished while he was on the TDRL (temporary disability retired list), to satisfy the provisions of 10 USC, 1174 (h); however, he suffered an injustice because he was medically retired after 16 years of service. The Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, paragraph 040602, states in pertinent part, "If a member who has received an SSB payment becomes eligible for retired pay, recoup from the member the gross amount of SSB received, as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009312

    Original file (20070009312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 040301 states that before 15 September 1981, certain provisions of law governing separation from the active list required refund of severance pay upon a member's retirement. Paragraph 040302 states that lump-sum severance pay must be recouped by deducting from retired pay each month an amount based on the service for which the severance pay was received until the total deducted equals the amount of the severance pay. Table 4-2, of the regulation, states, in pertinent part, that a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00015

    Original file (BC-2005-00015.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The agreement also addressed that recoupment would occur if, and when, the applicant became eligible for retired pay, so the claims made by the applicant are clearly unfounded when he states that he did not know that his Reserve retired pay would be recouped for the SSB payment. AFPC/DPPRRP noted the applicant has requested an active duty retirement effective on his date of separation on 5 Jun 92. They stated the applicant did not have sufficient active service to request an active duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03169

    Original file (BC 2013 03169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03169 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Special Separation Benefit (SSB) recoupment of $37,186.64 be waived. However, at the time of his retirement, the recoupment law had not been passed. The applicant received separation pay from the Air Force in the amount of $75,501.36.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01129

    Original file (BC-2012-01129.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01129 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: A statement be added to his record stating had he not become disabled, he would have had a very good chance of remaining in the Air Force for 20 years in order to qualify for Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004406

    Original file (20120004406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Senator regarding the applicant's SSB recoupment from his military retired pay account. (3) Issue Three: DODFMR, Volume 7B, Chapter 4, subparagraph 040602 B, further states no recoupment of SSB is required, regardless of when paid, if the disability for which the member receives DVA compensation was incurred or aggravated during a period of later active duty. There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows DFAS has recouped an inappropriate amount of...