RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03965
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His separation code of JBK, which denotes Completion of
Required Active Service; Denied Reenlistment with half Separation
Pay, be changed.
2. His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd
term or career airman considered but not selected for
reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be
changed to allow his reentry into the Air National Guard.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not informed of his reason for early separation and was
under the impression it was due to down-sizing or re-
organization of his career field.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 7 Jan 1992, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
On 17 Jul 1995, the applicant was notified by his commander that
he was not recommending him for reenlistment in the Air Force.
His reason for this action was the applicant had a history of
marginal performance.
On 27 Jul 1995, the applicant acknowledged receipt of his non-
selection for reenlistment and stated that he did not intend to
appeal this decision.
On 27 Oct 1995, the applicant was honorably discharged. His
narrative reason for separation was Completion of Required
Active Service.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to
change his separation code. DPSOR states that the applicant did
not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred
in the discharge processing. Based on the documentation on file
in the master personnel records, the discharge to include his
separation code was consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was
within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant
states that he was not informed of the reason for his
separation; however, on 27 Jul 1995, he signed AF Form 418,
stating that he acknowledged receipt of the official
notification of non-selection for reenlistment.
The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request to
change his RE code. DPSOA states that in accordance with AFI
36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective
reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. The
Selective Reenlistment Program considers the members Enlisted
Performance Report ratings, unfavorable information from any
substantiated source, the airman's willingness to comply with
Air Force standards and/or the airman's ability (or lack of) to
meet required training and duty performance levels. The
applicant was discharged after his commander made a conscious
decision by non-selecting him for reenlistment. He did not
appeal the decision and did not provide any evidence of an error
or injustice that would warrant a change of his RE code.
The complete DPSOA evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 Dec 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office (Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2012-03965 in Executive Session on 30 May 2013, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 28 Aug 2012.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 22 Oct 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28 Nov 2012, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Dec 2012.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03965
On 17 Jul 1995, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was not recommending him for reenlistment in the Air Force. DPSOR states that the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include his separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04905
DPSOR recommends that his narrative reason for separation be changed from Convenience of the Government to Unsatisfactory Performance. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request to change his RE code to a 1. DPSOA states that on 28 Aug 2012, his commander approved his involuntary discharge with an honorable character of service for failure to progress in military training required to be qualified for service with the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) and separation code of JBK (less than six years of active service), be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows: His separation code JBK which denotes Completion of Required Active Service be changed. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The medical records provided by the applicant are noted; however, he has not...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03526
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03526 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code 4I which denotes Serving on Control Roster be changed to 3K which denotes Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or AFBCMR when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or 3B which denotes 1st or 2nd term or career airman ineligible to reenlist. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05829
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to 1J (eligible to reenlist but elected to separate). The remaining relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05829
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to 1J (eligible to reenlist but elected to separate). The remaining relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04545
On 3 Aug 09, the applicant submitted an appeal to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB). DPSOR states that based on the documentation on file in the applicants master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00594
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 11 Feb 13, the applicant was notified by his commander of his non-selection for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit...