RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03753
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 10 Jul 12 be removed from the
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The testing number pinned to his Physical Training uniform was
turned around during the completion of the aerobic component.
The Physical Training Leader (PTL) was not able to see his
number. His laps were miscounted and he had to run an extra lap.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant failed the FA dated 10 Jul 12.
On 14 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSIM sent a memorandum to applicant
requesting additional documentation. Specifically, a signed
fitness score sheet.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM notes the commander has the
authority to invalidate a FA based on an injury or illness that
occurred during the test; however, the AFI does not provide any
guidance that supports commanders invalidating FA for any other
purpose. DPSIM further notes the support memorandum provided by
the applicant was not signed by his commander and; therefore,
does not confirm its validity. Furthermore, the applicant did
not provide the additional documents requested.
Based on the memorandum describing the events of the
administration of the cardio component of the FA, DPSIM concludes
there is no discrepancy in regards to the number of laps the
applicant performed. The memorandum indicates the test
administrators verified the lap count before they recorded the
time on the applicants score sheet.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 8 Feb 13, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicants contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is
in error or unjust. The unsigned memorandum from the applicants
commander is noted; however, in the absence of a signature and a
copy of his signed fitness score sheet from the FA in question,
we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record.
However, should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be
willing to reconsider his request. In view of the above and in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03753 in Executive Session on 11 Jun 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Aug 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 24 Jan 13, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Feb 13.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03753
DPSIM further notes the support memorandum provided by the applicant was not signed by his commander and; therefore, does not confirm its validity. The unsigned memorandum from the applicants commander is noted; however, in the absence of a signature and a copy of his signed fitness score sheet from the FA in question, we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Feb 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03068
By letter dated 31 July 2012, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide additional supporting documentation to substantiate her claim; specifically, her signed score sheet, signed questionnaire for the FA in question, and a signed memo from the PTLs administering the test stating details of what happened on the date in question (Exhibit B). The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02511
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of the FACs lap count sheets from his 16 Feb 12 FA and his retest on 13 Mar 12. The applicants last five FA results: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Mar 12 85.70 Satisfactory 16 Feb 12 72.20 Unsatisfactory 12 Jul 11 83.10 Satisfactory 23 May 11 75.80 Unsatisfactory 16 Nov 10 77.80 Satisfactory The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01974
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01974 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 14 February 2013, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 14 February 2013, the applicant completed the contested FA and received an unsatisfactory overall score of 35.90 due to completing...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03846
The airman indicates the applicant completed the run portion of the FA ahead of his 12:59 run time. He again entered the track to provide support to the airman in completing the run by running with the airman and when they crossed the finish line the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) personnel incorrectly recorded his time as 13:34. In this respect, we note the applicant has provided a supporting statement from a fellow participant indicating the time recorded for the applicant must be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03506
On 12 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory score (37.00) completing all four components. If the FA is invalidated, the Airman will be required to retest on all non-exempt FA components within five duty days from original FA test date. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02387
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 5 October 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04102
A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide documentation from the FAC personnel stating the scores were entered into AFFMS incorrectly or provide the original score sheet. The applicants last six FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 12 Sep 13 90.89 Excellent (Exempt from SU) 7 Aug 12 94.20 Excellent 22 Jun 11 91.30 Excellent 29 Apr 11 86.50 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) *3 Oct...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05047
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05047 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 12 Oct 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The fitness monitor incorrectly counted...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05052
In support of his contentions, he submits a Primary Care Manager Memorandum dated 8 Jul 13, recommending the contested FA be invalidated and noting the applicant was cleared to retake the FA within 10 duty days, due to a pending profile; a Duty Limiting Condition Report (AF Form 469), dated 8 Jul 13, and a Fitness Assessment Score Sheet, dated 15 Jul 13. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 31 Jan 14 88.00 Satisfactory 15 Jul...