RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04559
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The applicant did not provide any contentions.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are contained in
the Discharge Notification letter at Exhibit B. Accordingly, there is no
need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
provided a copy of an Investigative Report (Exhibit C). On 21 Mar 11, a
copy of the Investigative Report was provided to the applicant for review
and comments, along with a request for post-service documentation (Exhibit
D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of this case;
however, we find no evidence or an error or injustice that occurred in the
discharge process. It appears the applicant’s discharge was consistent
with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation in effect at
the time, and within the commander’s discretionary authority. No evidence
has been presented to indicate otherwise. We considered upgrading the
discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented
is sufficient for us to recommend granting relief upon this basis.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend favorable consideration of the application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-
04559 in Executive Session on 14 Jun 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Sep 10.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records
Exhibit C. FBI Investigative Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Dec 10, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03038
The relevant facts pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are contained in the Discharge Notification Letter at Exhibit B. It appears the applicant’s discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation in effect at the time, and within the commander’s discretionary authority. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 27 Oct 10, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03654
We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient for us to recommend granting relief upon this basis. Exhibit B. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Dec 10, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04215
On 31 Jan 11, a copy of the Investigative Report was forwarded to the applicant along with a request for post-service documentation for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient for us to recommend granting relief upon this basis. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00930
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00930 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00943
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00943 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00166
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00166 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Exhibit C. FBI Report #209344D, dated 1 Jul 10. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 Jul 10, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00462
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00462 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. On 21 Jun 76, the applicants commander recommended he be discharged with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of AFM 39-12, Section F. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00796
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00796 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing directives and we find no evidence to indicate that his separation from the Air Force was inappropriate. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02796
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02796 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINED THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02344
On 12 November 1964, an appointed Evaluation Officer (EO) recommended the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Air Force Regulation 39-16 with a general discharge. On 12 November 1964, the applicant was discharged from active duty with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post-service activities.