RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00022
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program) be changed so he can reenter the
military at a later date.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was on a restrictive profile for over a year due to a knee
injury. The injury he sustained, put him in constant pain which
eventually led to his inability to perform his job or to retain
or recall job knowledge. As a result, an Air Force Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, was completed
before his medical issue was resolved. He feels he should have
been referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) prior to his
non-selection for reenlistment.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the master personnel records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the applicant was
honorably discharged 31 August 2010 after serving 5 years,
1 month, and 19 days on active duty in the Regular Air Force. He
was not eligible to stay in the Air Force because his commander
initiated an Air Force Form 418 non-recommending him for
reenlistment on 27 April 2010. The supervisor stated the
applicant received feedback well above and beyond the minimum
requirements, to include verbal counseling on numerous occasions
and that he was subjected to the progressive discipline process
to try to correct his errors; all with little success.
Additionally, he stated the applicant was able to accomplish non-
technical tasks, but required supervision on all levels. On
28 April 2010, the applicants commander stated the applicant
failed to sustain USAF standards of performance and also failed
to complete career field training requirements. On 13 May 2010,
the applicant acknowledged his non-selection and identified his
intent to appeal the decision. There is no evidence to indicate
when the applicant submitted an appeal for his non-selection for
reenlistment; however, according to the Air Force Form 418, his
appeal was denied on 25 June 2010 and the applicant acknowledged
the decision on 14 July 2010.
DPSOS indicates the applicant does not provide any justification
to support a change of his RE code, but only provides statements
that he should have met a medical board and not receive the RE
code 2X. The RE code 2X has nothing to do with any medical
condition he had. His RE code of 2X is required based on his
non-selection for reenlistment by his commander under the
Selective Reenlistment Program.
A complete copy of the DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibits D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 1 July 2011, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We note
the applicants contention that he should have been considered by
an MEB for his knee injury prior to his non-selection for
reenlistment; however, other than his own assertions, we find no
evidence that his knee injury affected his ability to perform his
job or that it affected his willingness to comply with Air Force
standards. As a result, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-00022 in Executive Session on 29 November 2011,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2011-00022:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Dec 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Apr 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jul 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03787 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Code of LBK with a narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Service and his Reentry Code of 2X 1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to allow...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00033
The applicant contends that none of the evaluators were members of the Air Force. In accordance with AFR 39-62, Noncommissioned Officer and Airman Performance Reports, when none of the evaluators are Air Force personnel, an Air Force advisor must sign the report. Even if the reasons for the delay in filing are insufficient to excuse the delay, we may examine the facts and circumstances of the case and, if substantial evidence of error or injustice exists, waive the three year time limit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02577
DPSOS states the DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code JBK (less than 6 years of active service) or LBK (more than 6 years of active service) with a corresponding narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Active Service since the member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and as in the applicants case, the DOS/ETS may be involuntarily accelerated. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03414
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change of his RE code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04867
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04867 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP) be changed to allow him to reenlist. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00193
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00193 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code of “2X” “1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)” be changed. The applicant’s supervisor non- recommended him for reenlistment and his commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 418,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01103
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct and she has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested changes to her discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01993
On 12 February 2007, the applicant's supervisor initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, and non-recommended him for reenlistment. DPSOA found no evidence of error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01569
Applicant believes with all of the support documentation in his case, he is a very valuable asset to the Air Force In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; extracts from his military personnel record, including copies of his performance reports and AF IMT 418s, along with several letters of character reference. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant’s commander concurred and denied his reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04153
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release and Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Although there is no AF Form 418 in his records, there is a presumption of regularity in which the applicant was assigned the correct RE code (absent documentation to support an error).