Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04635
Original file (BC-2010-04635.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2010-04635

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service records be  corrected  to  reflect  award  of  the  Republic  of
Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) for his service in Vietnam.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served in Vietnam in 1973.  His DD Form 214, Report  of  Separation  From
Active Duty, only lists the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).

The evidence submitted in support of the appeal is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to  this  application  are  contained  in  the
letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air  Force.   Accordingly,
there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP reviewed this application and recommends  denial.   There  is  no
documentation in the applicant’s  military  records  that  substantiates  he
served  in  Vietnam.   DPAPP  requested   the   applicant   provide   source
documentation showing the location and number of days he served in  Vietnam.
 The applicant did not respond.

The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSIDR reviewed this application and recommends denial.  DPSIDR  states
they were unable to verify the applicant served  in  support  of  operations
for award of the RVCM.

The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 27  May  11
for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,  no  response  has
been received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence  of  error  or  injustice.    After   careful   consideration   of
applicant's  request  and  the  available  evidence  of  record,   we   find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to  warrant  corrective  action.
The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based  on
the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted  by  applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights  to  which  entitled,
appropriate regulations were not followed,  or  appropriate  standards  were
not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-
04635 in Executive Session on 4 Aug 11, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR  Docket  Number  BC-
2010-04635 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Dec 10, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPCC/DPAPP, dated 22 Apr 11.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 20 May 11.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Apr 11.





                                 Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04635

    Original file (BC-2011-04635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RVCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who: served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 and 28 March 1973; or served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months. DPSIDR verified the applicant is entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with V device and one Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) and the Republic of Vietnam...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04218

    Original file (BC-2010-04218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04218 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the following: 1. Credited for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01865

    Original file (BC-2011-01865.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01865 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00212

    Original file (BC-2012-00212.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RVCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who: served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 1961 and 28 Mar 1973; or served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02234

    Original file (BC-2010-02234.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02234 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P) (Administratively Corrected) be added to his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04289

    Original file (BC-2011-04289.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VSM is awarded to service members of the Armed Forces who served at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, their contiguous waters, or the airspaces there over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Although the applicant received the VSM and RVCM, the award of these decorations did not require his actual presence in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04655

    Original file (BC-2011-04655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01435

    Original file (BC-2011-01435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01435 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Oct 11 for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04798

    Original file (BC-2011-04798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04798 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSIDR indicates that the Directorate of Personnel Assignments (DPA)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03005

    Original file (BC-2010-03005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03005 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) and any other service awards associated with his temporary duty (TDY) performed in Peshawar, Pakistan. No official documentation was provided or located that...