RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00067
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for separation and separation program
designator (SPD) code be reviewed.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was discharged under Phase II of the force shaping program;
however, his narrative reason for separation and SPD code are
incorrectly reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release
or Discharge from Active Duty. As a result, he is being
precluded from qualifying for a home loan guarantee through the
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 3 Jun 03. On 1 Dec 04, he was
released from active duty with an honorable character of service
and an SPD code of MND and a corresponding narrative reason for
separation of Miscellaneous/General Reasons. He was credited
with 1 year, 5 months, and 29 days of total active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of
an error or injustice. The applicants date of separation was
approved in accordance with Military Personnel Flight Memorandum
(MPFM) 04-35, which states the Limited Active Duty Service
Commitment (LADSC) Waiver Program allows officer and enlisted
personnel to either retire or separate prior to completing their
specified ADSC or service commitment. Personnel who separate
under these provisions will do so under the miscellaneous
provision of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen.
The narrative reason of Miscellaneous/General reasons is
correct and consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation. Furthermore, the
applicant has not submitted any evidence or identified any
errors or injustices that occurred in the separation processing.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 29 Apr 11 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or
injustice that occurred during the discharge process. Based on
the available evidence of record, it appears the applicants
honorable discharge for miscellaneous/general reasons was
consistent with the substantive requirements of the governing
instructions. He has provided no evidence which would lead us
to believe his honorable discharge under the provisions of the
Air Force Force Shaping Program was improper or contrary to the
provisions of the governing directive, or the separation program
designator code issued in conjunction with his honorable
discharge was erroneous or inappropriately assigned. Therefore,
absent evidence the applicant was not afforded rights to which
he was entitled, there was an abuse of discretionary authority,
or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
recommend granting the requested relief.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-00067 in Executive Session on 27 Sep 11, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Dec 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 28 Mar 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Apr 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02885
The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, incorrectly reflects the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason as “MBK” and “completion of required active service.” The separation code should reflect “MND” and a narrative reason of “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” HQ AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOA reviewed the application and recommends denial, stating, in part, that on 15 Jun 05, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04094
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04094 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation Pregnancy or Childbirth be changed to a medical discharge. On 20 Oct 11, in a corrected advisory, DPSOS further clarified their evaluation and stated since the applicant was not able to complete her service...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01525
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice in the processing of the applicants discharge. On the other hand, personnel who chose not to separate under one of the voluntary programs, but remained in the Air Force, met a force Shaping...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02161
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02161 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Narrative Reason for Separation on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to Force Shaping. The DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code JBK (less...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02242
The applicant was honorably discharged effective 22 June 2005 with an RE code of 3A, a separation code of MND, and a narrative reason for separation of Miscellaneous/General Reasons. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. After reviewing his master personnel record along with the documentation he provided, the applicants RE code of 3A is correct, as he only completed 1 year, 1 month, and 12 days of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02059
In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and AF IMT 31, Airman’s Request for Early Separation/Separation Based on Change in Service Obligation. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02495
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02495 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 FEB 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from “Miscellaneous/General Reasons” to “Reduction in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01762
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She separated from the Air Force under the Fiscal Year 2007, Air Force - Force Shaping Limited Active Duty Service (LADSC) Waiver Program. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Consequently, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00067
While serving in the Air Force he had all but one 5 Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs). He received $10,314.00 in separation pay and received a 2X RE Code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00870
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00870 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed to reflect Reduction in Force at the convenience of the government. His DD Form 214 reflects the narrative reason for separation as Miscellaneous/General Reasons. The remaining relevant...