Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04394
Original file (BC-2010-04394.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2010-04394

                       COUNSEL:  NONE

                       HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her separation code “FND” be changed to reflect she  is  eligible  for
separation pay.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She believes she was eligible for separation pay.

In support of her request, the applicant provides documents  extracted
from her military personnel records and news article.

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application  are  contained  in
the letters prepared by the appropriate offices  of  the  Air  Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change  her
separation code.  DPSOS  notes  based  on  the  documentation  in  the
applicant’s master personnel record, they did not find any  errors  or
injustice in the processing of the applicant’s separation from the Air
Force.   The applicant received the correct separation code  of  “FND”
at the time of separation in accordance with fiscal  year  2007  Force
Shaping Guidance and the governing instruction.

The complete AFPC/DPSOS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
11 Feb 11 for review and comments within 30 days.  As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After careful  consideration  of
applicant's request and the available  evidence  of  record,  we  find
insufficient evidence of error  or  injustice  to  warrant  corrective
action.  The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion  appear
to be based on the evidence of record and  have  not  been  adequately
rebutted by  applicant.   Absent  persuasive  evidence  applicant  was
denied rights to which  entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no  basis
to disturb the existing record.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2010-04394 in Executive Session on 14 Jun 11, under the provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

       , Panel Chair
       , Member
       , Member

The following documentary evidence, pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-04394, was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 5 Nov 10, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOS, 9 Dec 10, w/atch.
      Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 11 Feb 11.




                             C
                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02099

    Original file (BC-2012-02099.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was discharged from the Air Force because she failed training and the Air Force would not reclassify her. Her commander initiated separation action on 11 Mar 2010, which gave her 178 days active duty at the time her separation action was initiated. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-02099 in Executive Session on 20 Dec 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02134

    Original file (BC-2010-02134.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02134 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry-level separation with uncharacterized service be upgraded to an honorable discharge, and her Reentry (RE) and separation program designator (SPD) codes be changed. In this respect, we note the comments by AFPC/DPSOS indicating that she was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03524

    Original file (BC-2010-03524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03524 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized service be changed to honorable; and that her reason for separation be changed from “disability existed prior to service (Disability EPTS).” ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01996

    Original file (BC-2010-01996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided no facts warranting a change to her separation code or narrative reason for separation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441

    Original file (BC-2010-01441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of “JFW” which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04089

    Original file (BC-2010-04089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04089 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her honorable discharge be changed to a medical discharge. On 19 Apr 07, the applicant’s commander notified her that he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for a condition that interfered with military service, specifically...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01987

    Original file (BC-2010-01987.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of character reference letters, her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States; letters recommendation, and extracts from her master personnel record. DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code of 4H is the only description applicable for members serving a suspended Article 15 punishment. We took...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03010

    Original file (BC-2011-03010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03010 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed from “Miscellaneous/General Reasons” to “For the Convenience of the Government.” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: An injury she received in Jun 93...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03624

    Original file (BC-2010-03624.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03624 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends the requested relief be denied. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02165

    Original file (BC-2012-02165.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized service for Erroneous Entry be upgraded to an Honorable discharge. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial indicating...