AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02394
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02394 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The discharge authority concurred with the recommendation and directed a general discharge. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02398
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02398 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect he contributed to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02402
His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. DPAPP states they could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02409
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02409 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02411
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02411 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Boynton Beach, Florida to Dallas, Texas. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02418
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02418 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized expenses in the amount of $4,750.00 to fly back to Orlando, Florida to claim his privately owned vehicle (POV). However, to correct the error in initially authorizing a POV shipment, they recommend the applicants records be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02419
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02419 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02421
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02423
Furthermore, if the applicant had been granted career status while being assigned to the CMSgt position it would have meant that she could have remained at Scott AFB until 2019 when she becomes eligible for an active duty retirement. We note the applicants assertion that she was selected for the superintendent position and subsequently promoted to the grade of CMSgt and due to her selection for the superintendent position her date of separation should be changed to 28 Feb 14. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02428
The applicant does not provide any additional evidence that was not considered by the commander at the time of the non- judicial punishment was rendered and the commander had sufficient evidence available to find the applicant had committed the charged offenses. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Sep 11 for review and comment within 30 days. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02445
DPSIDR states the applicant believes he should receive the AmnM for his actions on 19 Jun 01 while stationed at Travis AFB, CA. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-02445 in Executive Session on 29 Sep 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Jun 11, w/atchs. Exhibit C....
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02447
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR reviewed this application and recommends denial noting there was no official documentation provided or located in the applicants military...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02448
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02448 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02451
To be eligible, a service member must be: 1) attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground and/or shore (military) operations; 2) attached to or regularly serving for one or more days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military operations; 3) actually participating as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations in the AOR; or 4) serving on temporary duty for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02457
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change in his RE code. However, his duty performance is the reason he was denied reenlistment, requiring a RE code 2X and his discharge under the Early Separation Program - Strength Reduction was not the reason for the RE code 2X. We find no evidence of error in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02459
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02459 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). His attorney at the time advised him to plead guilty in order to receive a special court-martial; otherwise, he would have received a general court-martial where the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02464
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Per AFI 36-2910, paragraph 3.4.1.2.3., the Eight Year Rule states a disabling condition will be found to be in the line of duty, even though the condition existed prior to serve (EPTS), if the member has a least eight years of active service (8 years do not have to be consecutive), and the member was on active duty orders specifying a period of more than 30 days at the time the condition became unfitting, as...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02465
DPSIDRA states the applicant was awarded the BSM for meritorious service from 6 Jan 66 to 24 Feb 67; however, the valor device is authorized only when the BSM is awarded for heroism. The applicants elements indicate he was awarded the BSM for meritorious service not heroism. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02466
On 14 Dec 05, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32, Air Force Military Training and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, for Misconduct: Minor Disciplinary Infractions. On 7 Dec 10, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicants request for upgrade of his general (under honorable conditions) discharge to honorable. RE Code 2B, is required per AFI 36-2606,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02467
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02467 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code that would allow her to reenlist. The application was timely filed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02471
The referral report was unjust as the Article 15 action did not exist during the rating period. He contends the comment in Section IV, line 6, of the referral report, which states, Fraternization/drunk disorderly led to Art 15 is unjust because the action did not exist at the time the reporting period closed. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02474
AFBCMR BC-2011-02474 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02475
AFBCMR BC-2011-02475 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02483
He would not have done a DITY move had he known the correct rate provided no incentive and resulted in extra costs. On 2 Apr 12, PPA HQ ECAF amended paragraph 6 of their original Air Force evaluation to read should the Board choose to provide the applicant the relief he is seeking, recommend the records be changed to reflect that under competent authority, the PPM was processed on 1 Apr 10 resulting in the utilization of low cost rates under the Transportation Operational Personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02485
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. DPSIAR states the applicant and the former member were married on 28 Mar 83 and he elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to being placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List (PDRL) effective 28 May 03. In this respect, although neither the former member nor the applicant filed a valid election for SBP within the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02487
DPSIDRA states on 3 August 2011, they provided the applicant with Air Force Form 3994, Recommendation for Decoration Deployment/Contingency Operations, and instructions so that he could submit his request for entitlement to the AFCAM to the United States Air Force Central (AFCENT) for determination. The DPSIDRA complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02488
The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02490
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02490 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Servicemembers Group Life Insurance Traumatic Injury Protection (TSGLI) claim, dated 13 Oct 09, be approved. As part of the appeal process, the claim and medical documentation was reviewed by a physician assigned to AFPC/DPSD who also agreed...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02497
His grade of master sergeant (E-7) be restored with an effective date of 1 June 2004. The applicant received non-judicial punishment on 13 September 2010 for two incidents of failure to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty in violation of Article 86, UCMJ. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02498
The applicant's complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicants request to change the record to reflect that he was medically retired. The Medical Consultant found no nexus between the applicants ILOD injury of 1999 and his chronic lumbar condition, and noted a lack of evidence to demonstrate a chronic impediment to duty specifically due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02501
On 31 Jan 11, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for a condition that interferes with military service, specifically for mental disorders. DPSOS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Effective Date of Change of Strength Accountability (EDCSA) date be changed from 3 March 2011 to 2 March 2011 to preclude a break in service. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02507
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02507 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was retained on active duty for the purposes of Medical Continuation (MEDCON) during the period 17 May 10 through 30 Aug 10. The medical provider recommended surgery at that time and the applicant indicated, per...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02508
Control of Member After PEB Action states, The MPF will not retire, discharge, nor release a member from active duty before receiving the final decision in the form of retirement orders or instructions from HQ AFPC/DPPD directing disposition. According to information contained in the AFRC/SG evaluation, which is based on a review of the applicants medical records, The applicant began an AGR active duty tour on 19 May 97; in 2004, he underwent an MEB for a medical condition unrelated...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02510
The applicants commander approved the recommendation of the discharge board on 7 Oct 10. Based on the applicants overall performance, the discharge authority approved a general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Oct 11 for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02511
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02511 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The applicant was discharged on 7 January 1985 with a BCD and a narrative reason for separation of Conviction by Court-Martial (Other...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02514
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to change his Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code JDA, Fraudulent Entry into Military Service and Re-entry (RE) code of 2C, Approved Honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02515
AFBCMR BC-2011-02515 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02524
The inclusive dates for his Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) be corrected. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records were recently corrected and he was issued a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Service. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02535
In addition, the Board finds the evidence sufficient to give him the benefit of doubt in this matter as it does not appear reasonable that he would have knowingly elected not to elect this important benefit. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 17 February 2009, he elected spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02538
When enlisted promotions in the Air National Guard are approved a promotion order is written using the promotion board date as the DOR. As such, there is no way the promotion order would have been published directly after the board convened. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02543
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02543 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His duty history and duty station be corrected to reflect Creech Air Force Base (AFB) so he can file his travel voucher for a low-cost permanent change of station (PCS) move. The applicant requests his duty history be corrected to reflect he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02547
In view of the fact that the deceased former service member was eligible for retired pay at age 60, the applicant is eligible for an ID card, Base Exchange and Commissary privileges. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02548
It is just as likely he sustained the TBI at that time. DPSDC states that based on the documentation provided they were unable to confirm the applicant sustained an injury or incurred the condition from a combat-related event. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02557
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02561
AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, paragraph 3.5, implements the three-year limitations period established by 10 USC 1552(b) and further specifies that it runs not just from discovery of the error or injustice, but from the time at which, with due diligence, it should have been discovered. If the Board should find that the application is untimely, counsel requests that the Board hear the case in the interest of justice. The applicant did not file within three...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02564
In support of his request, the applicant provides a written statement, copy of his DD Form 214 Report of Separation from Active Duty, and an undated counseling evaluation letter from an Air Force Chaplain given at the time of his enlistment. On 7 November 1973 the evaluating officer counseled the applicant of the commanders recommended action and advised him of his right to submit a statement or a rebuttal on his behalf. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02566
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02566 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The 14th Air Force Commander responded that after a thorough review of his complaint, she found his commander committed no wrongs under Article 138; therefore, his request for redress was denied. The complete AFLOA/JAJM...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02567
Since that time, she was seen at the clinic for alcohol abuse and a suicide attempt on 4 Oct 2002. However, the mental health professional who evaluated her determined that her primary diagnosis was Borderline Personality Disorder and that she had an S4T profile, secondary to her alcohol abuse and involvement in the ADAPT program. She suffers from depression, suicidal ideations, anger issues, and has a personality disorder, which began during her time in the military and has continued...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02569
DPSOE states members cannot test in an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) for which they are no longer assigned. After returning from deployment, the applicant was scheduled and tested PFE only on 24 Feb 10 for cycle 10E6 in CAFSC 3D1X2 based on the AFSC conversion. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis...