Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02467
Original file (BC-2011-02467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02467 

 COUNSEL: NO 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an 
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without 
characterization of service) be changed to a code that would 
allow her to reenlist. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She desires to reenlist. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant submits a copy of her 
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 August 
2010. 

 

The applicant was notified by her commander on 4 April 2011, of 
his intent to recommend her discharge from the Air Force under 
the provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208. The specific 
reason was the applicant’s failure to perform her assigned duties 
by not making satisfactory progress in the Aerospace Medical 
Service Apprentice (Phase I) course. Specifically, she failed 
the National Registry Emergency Medical Technician written exam 
four times. As a result of these multiple failures, she was 
disenrolled from technical training on 7 February 2011. Prior to 
disenrollment, she was washed back two times, received 39 hours 
of additional instruction and counseling, and attended classes at 
the wing Learning and Development Center. These efforts failed 
to produce positive results. 

 

She was advised of her rights in this matter and waived her right 
to consult with counsel and elected not to submit statements on 
her own behalf. In a legal review of the case file, the 


assistant staff judge advocate found the case legally sufficient 
and recommended discharge. The discharge authority concurred 
with the recommendation and directed an honorable discharge. The 
applicant was discharged on 8 April 2011. She served 7 months 
and 29 days on active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states based on the 
documentation on file in the master personnel records, the 
discharge, to include the narrative reason for separation, was 
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of 
the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the 
discharge authority. 

 

The DPSOS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states that the applicant’s 
RE code 2C is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the 
USAF, chapter 3, based on her involuntary discharge with 
honorable character of service. The applicant does not provide 
any evidence of an error or injustice, but only states she wants 
to join the ANG and the RE code 2C is preventing her from 
joining. 

 

The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 1 November 2011, copies of the Air Force evaluations were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a 
thorough review of the evidence of record, it is our opinion that 
given the circumstances surrounding his separation from the Air 
Force, the RE code assigned was proper and in compliance with the 
appropriate instructions. In addition, the applicant has not 


provided any evidence which would lead us to believe that a change 
to her RE code to allow her to reenlist is warranted. Therefore, 
we agree with the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and 
adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-02467 in Executive Session on 4 January 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-02467 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 January 2011, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 8 September 2011. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 14 October 2011. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 November 2011. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02097

    Original file (BC-2011-02097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02097 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” and separation program designator (SPD) codes be changed so that she can serve again in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02933

    Original file (BC-2010-02933.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00485

    Original file (BC-2010-00485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00485 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to RE code 1C and that she be allowed to return to active duty. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01630

    Original file (BC-2011-01630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change her narrative reason for separation and separation code. Had the Air Force known of this condition at the time of her enlistment, she would not have been allowed entry into the military. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00351

    Original file (BC-2012-00351.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The four test failures were evidence of her lack of motivation. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While it is true she was counseled multiple times for her failures, she would like to make it clear that her academic deficiencies are not because of her lack of motivation. She failed this course, but it does not mean she would fail out of every course of study in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03053

    Original file (BC-2010-03053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03053 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service), her narrative reason for separation of “Personality Disorder,” and her separation code of “JFX.”,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04700

    Original file (BC-2011-04700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable and her reentry (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow her to reenter...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00481

    Original file (BC-2011-00481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the narrative reason for separation was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: He was set up for failure by the Air Force. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02146

    Original file (BC-2011-02146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02146 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04550

    Original file (BC-2011-04550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04550 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed so he can re-enlist in any branch of the service. The remaining relevant facts...