RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02457
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a
1J (Eligible to reenlist but elected to separate).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The RE code of 2X does not properly reflect his honorable
service. Although he was released under force reduction
policies there was no reason to list his RE code as 2X. His
performance was above standards. He has completed an
engineering degree and a Masters of Business Administration
(MBA).
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, issued in conjunction with his 31 Mar 86 separation and
college transcripts.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 23 Aug 84 for
a period of four years.
The applicant was discharged, on 31 Mar 88, by reason of early
separation program strength reduction, with service
characterized as honorable. He was credited with three years,
seven months, and eight days of active duty service.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant
did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would
warrant a change in his RE code. Additionally, the applicant
had an opportunity to appeal his denial of reenlistment, but
chose not to appeal the decision.
DPSOA notes that the governing Air Force instructions states
commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-
selection authority. The SRP considers the members Enlisted
Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable Information from a
substantiated source, the airman's willingness to comply with
Air Force standards and/or the airman's ability (or lack of) to
meet required training and duty performance levels. The
applicant states "under the pretence of a force reduction there
was no reason to list the above code" and that his duty
performance was not in question. However, his duty performance
is the reason he was denied reenlistment, requiring a RE code 2X
and his discharge under the Early Separation Program - Strength
Reduction was not the reason for the RE code 2X.
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 26 Aug 11 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, the discharge and the assigned RE code
appears to comply with the governing AFI and we find no evidence
to indicate that his separation or his RE code of 2X were
inappropriate. We find no evidence of error in this case and
after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been
submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not believe he
has suffered from an injustice. Therefore, in view of the
above, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-02457 in Executive Session on 29 March 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jun 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 16 Aug 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Aug 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03842
According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 17 Nov 11, he was non-recommended for re-enlistment by his supervisor as a result of a quality force review conducted IAW the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback PDSM 11-94. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02848
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02848 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be upgraded so that he can reenlist in the US Marine Corps (USMC). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to allow reentry in the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02205 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry Code (RE) of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to 3V (Separated w/Vol Sep Incentive) so he can enlist in the Utah Air National Guard. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow her to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03451
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02787 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to allow his reentry into the military. On 17 Feb 2011, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00594
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 11 Feb 13, the applicant was notified by his commander of his non-selection for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01804
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01804 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) be changed so he may reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02391
On 7 September 2010, he was notified that his supervisor not recommended him for reenlistment. The applicant was discharged on 31 May 2011 under the FY11 Air Force Shaping Rollback Program after serving 3 years, 9 months and 3 days. The applicant provides no proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code and his non-selection for reenlistment was in accordance with current guidance.