Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02524
Original file (BC-2011-02524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 


IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02524 

  COUNSEL: NO 

  HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. The inclusive dates for his Air Force Achievement Medal 
(AFAM) be corrected. 

 

2. He be issued a DD Form 256AF, Honorable Discharge 
Certificate. (Administratively Corrected). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His records were recently corrected and he was issued a DD Form 
215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge From Active Service. He would like item 5 corrected 
to reflect the correct inclusive dates of his AFAM. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, copies of his DD Form 214, DD Form 215, Special 
Order, dated 11 May 1993, his AFAM Citation, and correspondence 
from AFPC. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force 
from 15 Aug 1990 to 5 Jul 1995 for a total of 4 years, 
10 months, and 21 days. 

 

The AFAM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United 
States and foreign military personnel, below the rank of 0-6, 
after 20 Sep 1981, who while serving in any capacity with the 
U.S. Air Force, distinguish themselves by meritorious service or 
achievement. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 


 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial. DPSIDR states the applicant 
appears to base his request on the letter he received from the 
Directorate of Assignments (DPAPP), dated 28 Apr 2011, in which 
they verified his service in Saudi Arabia from 31 Dec 1990 to 5 
Apr 1991.However, the applicant has a signed 
certificate/citation and Special Order, dated 11 May 1993, 
authorizing him entitlement to the AFAM with an inclusive period 
of 24 Aug 1990 to 13 Mar 1991. 

 

In a prior request, the applicant provided a copy of a travel 
order which states he was deployed on or about 30 Dec 1990, in 
support of Operation DESERT SHIELD; however, the travel voucher 
verifying the travel order, including exact arrival and 
departure dates, was not provided or located. Although DPAPP 
verified the applicant’s service in Saudi Arabia from 
31 Dec 1990 to 5 Apr 1991, they have been unable to locate any 
documentation verifying the recommending official changed the 
applicant’s AFAM inclusive period to the dates verified by 
DPAPP. 

 

The complete DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 23 Mar 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To 
date, a response has not been received (Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 


________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 1 May 2012, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

  Panel Chair 

  Member 

  Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2011-02524: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 16 Jun 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 12 Mar 2012. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Mar 2012. 

  

 Panel Chair 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03914

    Original file (BC-2010-03914.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03914 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, for his deployment to the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia in 1990. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00825

    Original file (BC 2013 00825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00825 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In a letter dated 21 March 2012, DPSIDRA advised the applicant that his DD Form 214, dated 15 September 1993, states in Section 18 that he served in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM and that this statement only verifies that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900692

    Original file (9900692.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 13 Apr 99, the Chief, Awards & Decorations Section, AFPC/DPPPR, requested the applicant provide a copy of his Travel Voucher in order to verify the location and inclusive dates of his TDY in support of Operation Desert Shield. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a copy of his Travel Voucher. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02329

    Original file (BC 2013 02329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AFOUA w/V, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, there was no official evidence showing the applicant was attached or assigned to a unit that received the award. Additionally, in view of the fact that we have determined that there is sufficient evidence to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00555

    Original file (BC-2007-00555.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states there are no documents in the applicant’s records that verify he was in Vietnam or Saudi Arabia. The DPAPP complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 3 July 2007, the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant and counsel for review and comment within 30 days. There are no documents in the applicant’s military personnel record which reflect he served in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01377

    Original file (BC-2011-01377.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    To be eligible, a service member must be: 1) attached to or regularly serving for one of more days with an organization participating in ground and/or shore (military) operations, 2) attached to or regularly serving for one or more days aboard a navy vessel directly supporting military operations, 3) actually participating as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations in the areas of responsibility, 4) serving on temporary duty (TDY) for 30...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01949

    Original file (BC-2011-01949.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01949 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: 1) Block 12c, Record of Service - Net Active Service this Period; to reflect 10 years, 0 months, 14 days, rather than, 9 years, 8 months, and 15 days. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00170

    Original file (BC-2010-00170.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    They indicated they were able to verify and confirm boots on the ground at Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for the period 3 Dec 92 through 26 Feb 93 (2 months and 24 days); Rhein-Main Air Base, Germany for the period 7 May 97 through 1 Sep 97 (3 months and 26 days); Incirlik Air Base, Turkey for the period 8 Jun 96 through 1 Jun 98 (1 year, 11 months, and 25 days). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02893

    Original file (BC-2011-02893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was awarded a decoration in recognition of his long and outstanding service to the Air Force; by amendment the applicant requests award of the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM). He wants the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for his long outstanding service. Since it appears the SDN number is correct as presently constructed and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show otherwise, we find no basis to recommend changing it.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01460

    Original file (BC-2011-01460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) verified the applicant was credited with Foreign Service from 1 Jan 91 to 30 Jun 91; however, they were unable to determine what country the applicant served in during this time frame. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Kuwait Liberation Medal – Saudi...