AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02279
In accordance with AFI-36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, Table 3.7, Note 6, the close-out date for EPRs is one year from the previous EPR close-out date or when 120 calendar days of supervision have passed. From the time the new rater was assigned until the EPR close-out on 2 Mar 10 there were 124 days of supervision, making the evaluation an accurate report in accordance with AFI 36-2406. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02291
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-02291 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Mr. Elwood C. Lewis, Ms. Debra M. Czajkowski, and Ms. Lynda T. O’Sullivan considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02304
On 29 Nov 79, the applicant, with counsel, appeared before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB); however, the AFDRB considered and denied the applicants request for an upgrade of his undesirable discharge. In considering the applicants overall record of service, the FBI Report of Investigation, and including the letters of support and accomplishments since his discharge, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge is warranted. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02307
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that he was awarded: a. The Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V). After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence which would lead us...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02313
On 17 Oct 09, he was assigned duties in an Air Force office and his OPR for this period proves he fulfilled his service commitment. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit Q). The MRB Legal Advisor states that according to AF/JAA, if an officer is appointed in another competitive category, both the time spent as an enrolled student at the USUHS and time after disenrollment would count toward credit for promotion.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02322
The Air Force now claims that she earned the additional points; however, they cannot be credited because she was no longer in the bonus program. She served in the Air Force specialty expressly stated in her contract (46N1) when earning the additional 12 points prior to Mar 09 and she should be credited with the additional 12 points. Her next duty performance was recorded on 12 Aug 06. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Aug 10, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02330
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was relieved from active duty on 30 September 2009 and retired from the Air Force on 1 October 2009, having served 20 years 6 months and 21 days on active duty. The Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty 1 August 2009, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02332
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02332 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for discharge (conscientious objector (CO)), with the corresponding Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of KCM and his reentry (RE) code of 2N (conscientious objector whose religious convictions preclude...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02337
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02337 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) or a medical discharge. While the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to warrant our granting his alternate request...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02343
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02343 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In response to our request, applicant provided post-service information, which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02344
On 12 November 1964, an appointed Evaluation Officer (EO) recommended the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Air Force Regulation 39-16 with a general discharge. On 12 November 1964, the applicant was discharged from active duty with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post-service activities.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02345
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2010-02345 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 1. (Award of basic PUC administratively corrected OPR recommends denial of PUC w/1OLC) 2. After a thorough review of the available...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02350
Therefore, he was discharged for fraudulent enlistment. However, documentation substantiated the applicant had more than one dependent at the time of his enlistment in the Air Force. On 20 April 1956, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and approved the applicants request that his undesirable discharge be upgraded.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02351
The Joint Meritorious Unit Award (JMUA). Documentation provided by the applicant verifies he was assigned to the 6903rd Electronic Security Group, Yongsan AIN, Korea, from August 1988 to July 1992. The applicant was not directly assigned to SUSLAK; therefore, is ineligible for entitlement to the JMUA awarded to SUSLAK.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02353
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02353 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (PH). The applicants case was considered by the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) on 1 October 2010; however, his request was denied. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02356
He be awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM). The AFAM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States and foreign military personnel, below the rank of O-6, after 30 September 1981, who, while serving in any capacity with the U.S. Air Force, distinguishes themselves by meritorious service or achievement. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02356 in Executive...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02359
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02359 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) be cancelled. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02361
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-02361 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02364
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02364 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect award of the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). No official documentation was located in the applicants military record verifying he served in a combat ready position and was awarded or recommended for the CRM by his assigned base. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02365
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02365 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Basic Military training Honor Graduate Ribbon (BMTHR). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02374
The complete DPSI evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 October 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02381
On 24 January 1956, an Air Force Board of Review found the findings and sentence correct in law and fact. The applicant waived his right to petition the U.S. Court of Military Appeals to review his case, making the findings and sentence in his case final and conclusive under the UCMJ. In response, the applicant provides an expanded statement and copies of seven letters in support of his request (Exhibit G).
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02383
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02383 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPSOS recommends his records be corrected to reflect "Secretarial Authority" with a separation code of "KFF". _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02386
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02386 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed be to a code that will allow him reentry into military service. Prior to 2003, the Services...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02389
The applicant originally submitted his request for correction of his date of promotion to captain to the AFBCMR on 2 July 2010. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The applicant was considered but not selected by the CY09 and CY10 Line of the Air Force Major Promotion Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02391
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02391 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the Calendar Year 2009C (CY09C) Major Central Selection Board (CSB), with the inclusion of his Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period of 29 September 2008 through 27...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02395
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02395 (DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE (BROTHER) HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The deceased former members discharge be upgraded from Undesirable to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge on the basis of clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02396
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02396 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: One of his two Armed Forces Expeditionary Medals (AFEM) be exchanged for the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The VSM is awarded to all service members of the Armed Forces who between 4 July 1965 and 28 March 1973, served in the following areas...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02402 ADDENDUM
His records since his discharge are clean. The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and considered the weight and relevance of the additional documentation provided by the applicant, and whether or not it was discoverable at the time of any previous application. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, 24 Sep 10, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02403
Records reveal that on 7 Sep 93, the applicant was notified of pending discharge action. The applicant was discharged on 19 May 93. On 8 Sep 10, a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant for a response within 30 days (Exhibit C).
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02407
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial of his request for a retroactive 180-day per diem waiver for the period 29 April 2010 to 31 May 2010. MRM states that after a review of the available evidence, they note the applicants orders were...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02409
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02409 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receives a retroactive 180-day per diem waiver for the period 29 April 2010 to 31 May 2010. After reviewing the applicants submission and the evidence of record, it appears the applicants unit erroneously prepared and amended orders before...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02412
MRM states that after a review of the available evidence, they note the applicants orders were changed by the orders clerk from will not commute to will commute to allow the applicant to continue on orders until a per diem waiver could be approved. It appears the applicants unit erroneously prepared and amended orders before obtaining the required per diem waiver. ____________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02415
On 13 March 1953, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge under the authority of Air Force Regulation 39-21, for fraudulent entry into the Air Force by concealment of prior service. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post-service activities. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02422
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02422 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The discharge authority concurred and the applicant was discharged on 10 Feb 83 with a UOTHC discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02437
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02437 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reinstated back on active duty; or in the alternative, her reentry (RE) code of 2B {involuntarily separated with a general or under other that honorable condition (UOTHC) discharge} be changed. The applicants justification is in reference to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02443
DPSIAR states it is unfortunate the service members health declined after his marriage; however, there is no basis in law which would entitle the applicant to SBP. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02444
A complete copy of the AFRC/SGP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not provided any supporting documentation that substantiates that a DD Form 214 should have been issued for the period of service in question (i.e., active duty orders reflecting that she completed 90 continuous days or more of active duty, or reflecting that she has been involuntarily mobilized during the event of a national emergency or war under 10 USC 12301, 12302, 12304,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02447
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-02447 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02460
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-02460 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02463
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-02463 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02467
DPSIAR states the service member did not notify the finance center of the change in his marital status when his spouse died and SBP premiums continued to be deducted from his retired pay. Upon receiving notification of both deaths, the DFAS Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) suspended the service members spouse coverage retroactive to the date of death and issued his arrears of pay (AOP) beneficiary a refund of SBP premiums subject to the six-year statute of limitations as dictated by law. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02472
Unit Commanders must inform airmen of adverse actions in writing or verbally before promotion effective date. DPSOE states the applicant was tentatively selected for promotion to technical sergeant; however, her promotion was placed in withhold on 24 Feb 10 due to her being under military/civil investigation. DPSOE notes the applicants contention that the withhold action was not accomplished by the unit commander per the governing AFI; however, her commander explains in her 21 Apr 10...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02477
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2010-02477 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of: 1. The remaining relevant evidence extracted from the applicants master personnel records is contained in the evaluations provided by the Air Force offices of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02487
The recommendation must be made by someone, other than the member himself, preferably the commander or supervisor at the time of the act or achievement, with firsthand knowledge of the members accomplishments. The recommendation must include the name of the decoration (i.e., DFC), reason for recognition (heroism, achievement, or meritorious service), inclusive dates of the act, and a narrative description of the act. _________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02504
DPAPP states a review of the applicants master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02510 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In support of his request, the applicant provides personal statements. On 27 Apr 88, the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02518
The ACM may be awarded to members who serve or have served in Afghanistan (or its contiguous air space) in support of OEF from 24 Oct 01 to a date to be determined. Eligibility for the ICM requires service members to have served in direct support of OIF. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2010-02518 in Executive Session on 13 January 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02524
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-02524 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02536
He did not submit a request to enroll his spouse in SBP within the first year of their marriage. The OPR states he was mailed the August 2005 and 2006 editions of the Afterburner, and he should have been placed on notice that he had one year to enroll his spouse in SBP. As we understand the crux of counsels argument in behalf of the applicant, the applicants record should be corrected to reflect a timely election of coverage for his spouse under SBP because the Air Force failed to...