Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02403
Original file (BC-2010-02403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02403 

 INDEX CODE: 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be 
upgraded to honorable. 

 

2. His narrative reason for separation of “Misconduct – Drug 
Abuse” be changed to “Misconduct.” 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was told that after six months he could request his records 
be changed to reflect an honorable discharge and “drug abuse” 
would be dropped from his narrative reason for separation. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 3 Sep 91. 

 

Records reveal that on 7 Sep 93, the applicant was notified of 
pending discharge action. Specifically, the commander cited 
drug abuse as the basis for discharge. An investigation by the 
Office of Special Investigation (OSI) revealed the applicant 
wrongfully used Butane as an inhalant to alter his mood and to 
obtain an intoxicating effect between 1 Jun 92 and 31 Oct 92. 
The report also revealed the applicant admitted to taking Medi-
Flu (a decongestant) while drinking alcohol in order to keep a 
constant “buzz” and not get drunk and pass out. 

 

The applicant was discharged on 19 May 93. He is credited with 
1 year, 8 months, and 17 days of active service. 

 

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigations (FBI) states they were unable to identify an 
arrest record on the basis of the information furnished. 


 

 

On 8 Sep 10, a request for post-service information was 
forwarded to the applicant for a response within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the 
available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was 
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. 
The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to 
believe the characterization of his service and narrative reason 
for separation were contrary to the provisions of the governing 
regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses 
committed. Further, clemency was not considered due to the 
applicant’s failure to provide the requested post-service 
information outlined in the Information Bulletin. Therefore, in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon 
which to recommend granting the relief sought. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2010-02403 in Executive Session on 23 November 2010, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 


 , Member 

 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered for Docket 
Number BC-2010-02403: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Apr 10. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 Sep 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00039

    Original file (BC-2009-00039.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s general discharge for minor disciplinary infractions was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander’s discretionary authority. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03617

    Original file (BC-2010-03617.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03617 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 15 Dec 08, the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge, citing the applicant was provided full administrative due...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02045

    Original file (BC-2011-02045.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There is no evidence to support him being discharged for drug abuse; therefore, the discharge is unjust and in error. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 30 Apr 90. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02978

    Original file (BC-2008-02978.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02978 INDEX CODE: 112.10 xxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable and his reentry (RE) code be changed so he may enlist in the Air Force Reserve. On 28 Apr 93, he received nonjudicial punishment for being...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02057

    Original file (BC-2010-02057.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02057 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His reenlistment (RE) code of 2B (Separated with a general or under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. The applicant in support of his application submitted a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00043

    Original file (BC-2002-00043.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Jun 95, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions), and was issued a reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible.” Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/JAJ recommends that no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04319

    Original file (BC-2011-04319.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04319 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable and his RE Code of 2B (Discharge Under General or Other Than Honorable Conditions) be changed accordingly. On 5 Mar 93, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04921

    Original file (BC-2011-04921.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 Feb 95, the findings and recommendations of the administrative discharge board were found legally sufficient and, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished a UOTHC discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report which is attached at Exhibit C. A copy of the FBI Investigative Report and a request for post- service information was forwarded to the applicant on 3 Jul 12 (Exhibit D). We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02409

    Original file (BC-2011-02409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02409 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02921

    Original file (BC-2011-02921.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02921 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reinstated in the United States Air Force. A commander can determine if a member’s use of a substance was improper or wrongful based on the circumstances of the use. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel...