Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02365
Original file (BC-2010-02365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02365 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be awarded the Basic Military training Honor Graduate Ribbon 
(BMTHR). 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He worked hard to obtain the honor graduate ribbon while 
attending basic training. He would like his records corrected 
because he earned the ribbon. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

APFC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR was unable to locate any 
official documentation to verify he was an honor graduate at 
basic training nor does the applicant provide any source 
documents to support his claim. 

 

The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 
12 Nov 10 for review and response. As of this date, no response 
has been received by this office (Exhibit C). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful 
consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence 
of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to 
warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the 
advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and 
have not been adequately rebutted by the applicant. Absent 
persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which 
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or 
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to 
disturb the existing record. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-02365 in Executive Session on 10 Feb 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010-
02365 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jun 10. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 18 Oct 10. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Nov 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01582

    Original file (BC-2010-01582.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that neither the evidence of record nor the applicant’s military personnel record (MPR) substantiates that he served in Vietnam. Should the applicant provide sufficient evidence in the form of eyewitness statements, travel vouchers, or letters of evaluation to substantiate his eligibility for award of the VSM, we would be willing to reconsider his request. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02217

    Original file (BC-2010-02217.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 6 Aug 70, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force at the completion of his required active service. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03856

    Original file (BC-2007-03856.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03856 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the NCO Professional Military Education Graduate Ribbon (NCOPMEGR) and his NCO Orientation Course Professional Military Education, Phase I be documented. The complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02477

    Original file (BC-2010-02477.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2010-02477 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of: 1. The remaining relevant evidence extracted from the applicant’s master personnel records is contained in the evaluations provided by the Air Force offices of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00180

    Original file (BC-2012-00180.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, Special Order GB-821, a Citation for the AFOUA, an AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, and information concerning eligibility for the AFTR. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03615

    Original file (BC-2010-03615.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDR, after reviewing his request and military personnel records, found no evidence to verify his entitlement to the SAEMR. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03922

    Original file (BC-2010-03922.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The ASCM is awarded to Air Force members who, after 24 Mar 99, participated in, or directly supported, a significant US military operation designated by the Chief of Staff of the Air Force. No documentation was located or provided to verify the applicant was deployed in direct support of Operation ALLIED FORCE.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03922

    Original file (BC-2010-03922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the ASCM and AFESR, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The ASCM is awarded to Air Force members who, after 24 Mar 99, participated in, or directly...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04393

    Original file (BC-2009-04393.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: According to the Air Force Personnel Center Factsheet, effective Dec 86, the AFTR is authorized to anyone who served on active duty regardless of initial accession training completion date. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00080

    Original file (BC-2010-00080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Long Tour (AFOR-LT). Before 6 Jan 86, the ribbon was awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. Before 6 Jan 86, the ribbon was awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80.