Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02337
Original file (BC-2010-02337.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02337 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His general under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) 
discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) 
or a medical discharge. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) determined he was 
suffering from anxiety disorder at the time of his discharge. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement and DVA documentation. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who 
entered active duty on 19 October 2004 and was promoted to the 
grade of airman first class (E-3). 

 

The applicant received one Letter of Counseling, four Letters of 
Reprimand, and one Article 15 between 27 October 2005 and 
19 March 2007. 

 

On 21 May 2007, the applicant was notified that his commander was 
recommending him for a general (under honorable conditions) 
discharge for Misconduct: Pattern of Misconduct, Conduct 
Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline under the authority of 
Air Force Program Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 3208, 
paragraph 5.50.2. The applicant acknowledged receipt of the 
notification, consulted counsel, and submitted statements in his 
own behalf. On 6 June 2007, the Staff Judge Advocate found the 
case to be legally sufficient and recommended the applicant be 
separated with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge 
without probation and rehabilitation. 

 


On 6 June 2007, the discharge authority approved the recommended 
discharge and directed the applicant be discharged with a general 
(under honorable conditions) discharge. 

 

On 8 June 2007, the applicant was released from active duty after 
serving 3 years, 5 months, and 19 days on active duty. 

 

On 10 March 2010, the Discharge Review Board (DRB) considered and 
denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his characterization of 
discharge to honorable. 

 

On 8 October 2010, SAF/MRBR, notified the applicant that attempts 
to obtain his service medical records were unsuccessful and 
requested his assistance in obtaining them. To date, the 
applicant has not responded. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error. We note the evidence of 
record indicates the discharge authority directed the applicant 
receive a general (under honorable conditions) discharge; 
however, Block 24 of the applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of 
Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects a “General (Under 
Other Than Honorable)” discharge. We believe this entry to be in 
error. While the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence 
to warrant our granting his alternate request of a medical 
discharge, we believe his DD Form 214 should be corrected to 
reflect the characterization of service directed by the discharge 
authority, general (under honorable conditions). Therefore, we 
recommend his record be corrected as indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 8 June 2007, 
he was discharged with service characterized as general (under 
honorable conditions). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 24 March 2011, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-
02337 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jun 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02337

    Original file (BC-2005-02337.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    In view of the foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the words “and conduct” be deleted from Block 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02337

    Original file (BC-2006-02337.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 137.04 BC-2006-02337 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02337

    Original file (BC-2007-02337.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    JAY H. JORDAN Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/DPP, dtd 8 August 2007 w/atchs AFBCMR BC-2007-02337 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01189

    Original file (BC-2010-01189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01189 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03029

    Original file (BC-2010-03029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who entered active duty on 23 March 1982 in the grade of airman (E- 2). On 19 April 1983, the applicant was discharged from active duty with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post-service activities.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04216

    Original file (BC-2010-04216.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 February 1997, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge characterization. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 2 June 11, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01148

    Original file (BC-2010-01148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant disagreed with the findings and requested a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) hearing of her case. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Department of Defense Instruction 1332.38, paragraphs E3.P3.3.3 and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01547

    Original file (BC-2010-01547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 July 2000, the commander notified the applicant that he was recommending him for discharge for erroneous enlistment under the authority of Air Force Personnel Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section C, Defective Enlistments, paragraph 5.14 under Basis for Erroneous Enlistment. The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing; nor, did he provide any facts warranting a change to his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04858

    Original file (BC 2013 04858.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit H. ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 5 February 2002 to 4 October 2007. However, further evaluation by Mental Health personnel, subsequently ruled-out the applicant’s diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder and indicated his symptoms supported a diagnosis of Personality Disorder. For an accounting of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04659

    Original file (BC-2010-04659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Block #11c of his DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged due to physical disability that existed prior to service; however, his medical records verify that military service aggravated his condition. The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The civilian medical report, provided by the...