RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02407
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive a retroactive 180-day per diem waiver for the period
29 April 2010 to 31 May 2010.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His home of record (HOR) is outside the commuting distance and
the orders should have stated non-commute status to allow for
per diem and lodging. A 180-day per diem waiver was needed to
process his order from 29 April 2010 to 30 September 2010 due to
the restrictions of receiving per diem in one location for more
than 180 days. A waiver was submitted in May 2010 due to
guidance given by NGB/A1 that orders were needed to process the
request.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of
Special Orders R-X000114, and R-X000202; memorandums from the
102 IG/CV, 102 IW DETCO, SAF/MRM; excerpts from the Air National
Guard Reserve Order Writing System (AROWS); the 102 Intelligence
Wing Instruction 65-101, Financial Management Office, Commuting
Distance, with attachment; and an excerpt from the Joint Federal
Travel Regulation (JFTR), Volume I.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving as an airman first class (E-3)
in the Air National Guard (ANG) at Otis Air National Guard Base
(ANGB), Massachusetts.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B and D.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PS recommends denial of his request for a retroactive
180-day per diem waiver for the period 29 April 2010 to 31 May
2010. The applicants unit changed the commute status in order to
publish his orders and stated this was done due to guidance
provided by NGB/A1. However, NGB/A1 notes their guidance is in
accordance with that of SAF/MR and HAF/A1, in that per diem
waiver requests will accompany the current/last order of the
service member. A future order should never be submitted because
that is the purpose of the per diem waiver. NGB/A1 further notes
the applicant incurred a financial loss; however, his commander
has processed numerous per diem waivers in the past for many
members in the unit. The commander and his staff are aware of
the current SAF/MR policy and criteria, as well as the importance
of submitting waiver packages in a timely fashion to allow for
processing.
The complete A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit B.
NGB/A1PS concurs with the NGB Subject Matter Expert (SME) and
recommends denial of the requested relief.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 27 August 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
SAF/MRM recommends denial. MRM states that per JFTR, Volume I,
paragraph U7150 A4b(3), a member called to active duty away from
home for more than 180 days, for other than training purposes,
may be authorized per diem for the entire period if the call to
active duty/extension is required by unusual circumstances,
emergency circumstances, contingency operations, or exigencies of
the service concerned as determined by the Secretarial process.
As of 22 March 2007, the Secretary of the Air Force delegated to
SAF/MRM those certain decision authorities under the JFTR and
JTR. Commanders must obtain the per diem waiver before orders
are issued or amended since the JFTR does not provide for
retroactive approval. Members without an approved waiver or
permanent change of station (PCS) assignment should be returned
to their old station and not be allowed to continue work at the
current location without temporary duty (TDY) and transportation
allowances. SAF/MRM Policy Memos of 19 August 2009 and
11 Febraury 2011, both indicate that commanders must obtain per
diem waivers (over 179 days) before orders are issued or amended.
MRM states that after a review of the available evidence, they
note the applicants orders were changed by the orders clerk from
will not commute to will commute to allow the applicant to
continue on orders until a per diem waiver could be approved.
The units understanding was that orders must be issued before a
per diem waiver could be submitted/approved.
On 25 March 2010, orders were approved from 29 March
30 September 2010, stating members residence is outside local
commuting distance, but member will commute daily no per diem
authorized.
On 11 May 2010, SAF/MRM approved continuation of per diem
allowances beyond 180 days, with dates of 1 June 2010
20 September 2010.
On 7 June 2010, the order was modified to members residence is
outside local commuting distance and will not commute Otis ANG
Base, MA. (29 March 30 September 2010. A per diem waiver to
exceed 180 days at one location from 1 June 30 September 2010
was approved.
The complete MRM evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 11 April 2011, a copy of the SAF/MRM evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant on 11 April 2011 for review and comment within
14 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an injustice warranting corrective
action. After reviewing the applicants submission and the
evidence of record, we believe relief is warranted. It appears
the applicants unit erroneously prepared and amended orders
before obtaining the required per diem waiver. NGB/A1PS
indicates the applicants unit should have been aware of the
policy and criteria as well as the importance of submitting the
waiver package in a timely manner. Notwithstanding this, it
appears the applicant is being held accountable for actions
beyond his control. It is not clear that the applicant
understood when his orders were amended to state that he would
commute, he would not be paid per diem. As such, no complicity
on the part of the applicant to erroneously extend his TDY has
been established. In view of the foregoing, and to preclude the
possibility of injustice to the applicant, we believe any doubt
in this matter should be resolved in his favor. Accordingly, we
recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he applied for a
per diem waiver for the period of 29 April 2010 to 31 May 2010
and his request was approved by competent authority.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-02407 in Executive Session on 21 June 2011, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jun 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 23 Aug 10, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Aug 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRM, dated 1 Apr 11.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 11 Apr 11.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2010-02407
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
APPLICANT be corrected to show that he applied for a per diem waiver for the period of 29
April 2010 to 31 May 2010 and his request was approved by competent authority.
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02412
MRM states that after a review of the available evidence, they note the applicants orders were changed by the orders clerk from will not commute to will commute to allow the applicant to continue on orders until a per diem waiver could be approved. It appears the applicants unit erroneously prepared and amended orders before obtaining the required per diem waiver. ____________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02409
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02409 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receives a retroactive 180-day per diem waiver for the period 29 April 2010 to 31 May 2010. After reviewing the applicants submission and the evidence of record, it appears the applicants unit erroneously prepared and amended orders before...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03001
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03001 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a retroactive per diem waiver for the period 29 April 2010 through 28 June 2010. SAF/MRM approved a per diem waiver for the applicant for the period 29 June 2010 through 27 August 2010. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00745
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she was placed on active duty orders her Home of Record (HOR) was considered within commuting distance of her duty station and she was consequently not eligible to receive per diem and lodging entitlements. In accordance with Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), SAF/FM, and HQ USAF/DPFJ policy, mobilization orders shall not be amended for the purpose of changing the members’ HOR/Place of Entry...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02816
If, however, the member's HOR is outside the commuting distance, the member is entitled to per diem and other additional financial benefits. His alleged former girlfriend testified that she did not date the applicant and he never lived at her residence. The complete AF/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He notes that it appears the government, in its advisory opinion addresses...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02973
Applicant submitted a waiver to DFAS through her unit comptroller. We understand the need to provide receipts for lodging, which she did and that part of her debt was forgiven; however, a requirement to provide receipts, or proof, she used her per diem for that which it was intended seems, to us, to be excessive and unnecessary in this case. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2005-02973 MEMORANDUM FOR...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05055
Consistent with the regulations of their respective service, members of the National Guard of Arizona who have twenty creditable years of service for retirement shall be separated from state service upon expiration of any issued Notice of Appointment unless a new Notice of Appointment is timely issued. The complete NGB/A1PO evaluation is at Exhibit E. 1. ANGRC/JA does not provide a recommendation but states the applicant attributes his separation from the AZANG and the resulting...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05912
In addition, the Department of Defense Inspector General (IG DoD/MRI) concurred with the determination, approved the report, and substantiated the allegations (Exhibit B). We note that based on the Report of Investigation (ROI) from the SAF/IG the applicant was the victim of reprisal under the Whistleblower Protection Act (10 USC 1034) by his former commander who denied his reenlistment and attendance at the Chief Executive Course (CEC). Other than the comments in the ROI, the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018884
The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was on temporary duty (TDY) travel orders on the days he traveled to Modesto, CA during the period 14 February 2011 to 16 February 2012. The applicant's request that he be placed on TDY travel orders for those days he traveled to and from Sacramento, CA to Modesto, CA during the period 14 February 2011 to 16 February 2012 and that he be reimbursed for corresponding travel completed and for per diem if authorized was carefully...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04635
AFBCMR BC-2012-04635 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...