RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02391
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the
Calendar Year 2009C (CY09C) Major Central Selection Board (CSB),
with the inclusion of his Officer Performance Report (OPR)
rendered for the period of 29 September 2008 through 27 October
2009, in his Officer Selection Record (OSR).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The OPR closing out 27 October 2009 was not signed and made a
matter of record until 7 December 2009. The wing commander
intended for the OPR to be considered by the CY09C CSB; however,
an administrative error delayed its completion. In accordance
with (IAW) AFI 36-2501, Officer Promotions and Selective
Continuation, the CY09C board did not consider information that
should have been available which directly affected his promotion
opportunity.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
OPR and letters of support from his leadership chain.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of captain.
The applicant was considered and not selected by the CY09C CSB to
the grade of major.
The Evaluation Reports Appeal Board reviewed the application and
determined no action was required.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID defers to AFPC/DPSOO. DPSID states the report was
processed IAW AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation
Systems, which states performance reports are due to AFPC no
later than 60 days after the closeout date. The closeout of the
report was 27 October 2009; therefore, the report was not
required to be in the applicants OSR until 27 December 2009.
Although it may have been the intent of the applicants
evaluators to have the report processed and made a matter of
record prior to the CSB, it was processed IAW AFI 36-2406.
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial. DPSOO states the absence of the
27 October 2009 OPR does not constitute an error since it was not
required to be filed in his OSR for the CY09C CSB until
27 December 2009.
If the applicant believed this document was important in his
promotion consideration, he could have written a letter to the
board members informing them of the accomplishments mentioned in
the reports. DPPPO has verified the applicant did not exercise
this entitlement.
The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the
applicant on 22 October 2010, for review and comment within
30 days. However, as of this date, no response has been received
by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After
reviewing the evidence of record, we are not persuaded the
applicants records are erroneous or unjust. The applicants
contentions are noted; however, in our opinion, the detailed
comments provided by the appropriate Air Force offices of primary
responsibility have adequately address those allegations.
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of
persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2010-02391 in Executive Session on 21 April 2011, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Jun 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 16 Sep 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 4 Oct 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Oct 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04446
The board convened on 8 March 2010 and the report was not finalized until 10 April 2010, after the board adjourned. DPSOO states the absence of the 11 February 2010 OPR does not constitute an error since the report was not required to be filed in the applicants record until 60 days after the close out date, or 13 April 2010. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04690
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04690 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. vxHis Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) rendered on him for the Calendar Year 2010B (CY10B) Major Central Selection Board (CSB) be rewritten by his new wing chaplain. He be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01810
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 8 January 2009 through 22 June 2009 be corrected (with the correct signature dates); and the corrected OPR be accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record (OSR); and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05186
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05186 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her AF Form 707, Officer Performance Report (OPR) (Lt thru Col), rendered for the period 16 September 2012 through 26 June 2013, be filed in her Officer Selection Record (OSR). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her final OPR from the Joint Staff, corrected DMSM, or the correct version of her PRF were not timely submitted to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04015
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04015 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2010A (CY10A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central Selection Board (CSB) with inclusion of his Officer Performance Report...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02317
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her promotion record was not complete at the time of the CY11A Lt Col CSB which prevented the promotion board from making a proper determination on her qualifications/competitiveness for promotion. Her Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 1 May 2011 was not filed in her Officer Selection Record (OSR) for the original CY11A Lt Col CSB. The non-selection received by the CY11A Lt Col CSB SSB was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00231
The board convened on 6 Jun 11 and the report was not signed and finalized until 25 Jul 11, after the board convened. To allow the OPR to be considered for SSB consideration with signature dates on or after the CY11A Col Chaplain CSB convening date would allow the applicant a potential promotion selection advantage other officers are not afforded whose evaluations closed out in similar timeframes prior to the CSB convening. The complete DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOO...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04368
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04368 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS: Her Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period of 10 May 2010 through 9 May 2011 be included as part of the As Met record for consideration for promotion to the grade of Colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the calendar year (CY) 2011...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04723
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04723 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2009B (CY09B) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central Selection Board (CSB) with a substituted Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF). The remaining relevant facts extracted...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01799
Although, the applicants OPR closed out on 3 Nov 12, it was not required to be in her record until 60 days after the close-out date, or 3 Jan 13. The Board convened on 5 Nov 12 and the applicants evaluator's did not sign and finalize the report until 15 Nov 12, with the applicant acknowledging receipt on 21 Nov 12, after the convening of the board. The absence of this report is not an error because it was not required to be filed in her OSR until 3 Jan 13.