Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02504
Original file (BC-2010-02504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02504 
  INDEX CODE:  110.02 
   COUNSEL:  NONE 
  HEARING DESIRED:  NO 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His records be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He was on temporary duty (TDY) from Yokota AB, Japan, to Osan AB and Kunsan AB, Korea, from December 1970 to March 1971.  He was also TDY from Kadena AB, Japan to Bein-Hoa AB, Vietnam. 
 
His records were not kept current by the Consolidated Base Personnel Office (CBPO) during his time of service.  He had a 202-day deployment and other TDY’s that are not in his records.  
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of information request letters, with replies, and extracts from his master personnel records. 
 
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On 1 Sep 89, the applicant retired in the grade of master sergeant.  
 
HQ AFPC/DPAPP confirmed the applicant had boots on ground in Japan from 10 August 1970 to 10 October 1972; Korat AB, Thailand, from 15 January to 18 December 1974; and Zweibrucken AB, Germany, from 26 April 1980 to 29 April 1984.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. 
 
The complete HQ AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 November 2010 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has not received a response. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Further, we note the applicant has been issued the Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal which can be used as verification for Department of Veterans Affairs benefits.  Additionally, exact Foreign Service locations were not recorded on the DD Form 214 during the period the applicant served.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    BC-2010-02504 in Executive Session on 5 January 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 , Panel Chair 
 , Member 
 , Member 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Jun 10, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 2 Nov 10. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Nov 10. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 
 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04365

    Original file (BC-2010-04365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04365 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam and the Philippines (Philippines service administratively corrected). However, the DD Forms 1351-2, Travel Voucher or Subvoucher, was illegible and requested the applicant provide a legible...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01279

    Original file (BC-2012-01279.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, it does not reflect the entire time he was TDY in Korea. The applicant’s response to the Air Force evaluation is noted, however, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect any service time beyond that currently reflected on his DD Form 214. ________________________________________________________________ 3 Panel Chair Member Member The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 13 Sep 2012 and 3 Oct 2012, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00144

    Original file (BC 2014 00144.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in Vietnam. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request for correction of his DD Form 214 to reflect he served in Korea. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Mar 14, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04350

    Original file (BC 2013 04350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04350 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01747

    Original file (BC-2005-01747.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01747 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 NOV 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he received the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) with two Oak Leaf Clusters (OLCs) and Vietnam service awards. A complete copy of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02858

    Original file (BC-2004-02858.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends the application be denied. While the possibility exists that he may have been in Korea at some time, he has provided no evidence substantiating he had temporary duty service to Korea for any specific dates or length of time. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application, in Executive Session on 18...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01952

    Original file (BC-2012-01952.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was given written military orders to report for 29 days temporary duty (TDY) at Cam Rahn Bay Air Base (AB), South Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records (MPR) and documentation submitted failed to provide any documents that would substantiate Foreign Service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ 2 , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-01952 in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01927

    Original file (BC-2010-01927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01927 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his foreign service in Vietnam and Korea. The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03636

    Original file (BC-2011-03636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to reflect foreign service in Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation he submitted failed to provide any documents to substantiate foreign service time in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to add the VSM to his records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02595

    Original file (BC-2011-02595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s master personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...