AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01872
Time spent employed with the Department of Justice or any other agency not affiliated with the military is not creditable service for Reserve retired pay. The ARPC/DPP evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 August 2004, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was sent to the applicant for review and comment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01874
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on established Eighth Air Force policy of awarding a DFC upon the completion of 10 lead combat missions, based on his completion of 11 lead combat missions he should be awarded the DFC. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01879
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant was approved for retraining into Air Traffic Control. A review of the applicant’s request indicates she has not provided any documentation indicating she was miscounseled or was entitled to other benefits she did not receive.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01888
c. On 3 October 1983, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling (LOC) for failure to report. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the reasons that were stated for his discharge are not accurate. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2004-01888 in Executive Session on 21 October 2004, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01891
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of applicant’s request since he does not meet the basic CRSC eligibility criteria of having 20 years of active military service. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01893
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01893 INDEX NUMBER: 128.14 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late father’s records be corrected to show that he was eligible to receive Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) benefits from the date the CRSC program was established until the date of his death. He...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01897
The notification should be provided on or before the date a member completes 14 years and 6 months of active service. He also did not provide any information showing he inquired of his Military Personnel Flight (MPF) regarding his CSB eligibility at anytime in the past two years. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 9 Jul 04 for review and response.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01900
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01900 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01901
c. Is entitled to retired pay, notwithstanding that such retired pay may be reduced due to receipt of Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability compensation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01902
On 12 August 2004, the Board staff requested the applicant provide a copy of the election he submitted for former spouse coverage (Exhibit F). On 26 August 2004, the Board staff requested the applicant provided a copy of his election for former spouse coverage following his divorce. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01903
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that applicant’s injuries were not the direct result of enemy action. His injury was caused by the bomb exploding and was the direct result of enemy action. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the documentation provided by applicant, we find insufficient evidence to substantiate the explosion was the direct result of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01904
INDEX CODE: 128.05 BC-2004-01904 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01921
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01921 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her disenrollment from the Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) program due to medical disqualification be voided. She never received adequate counsel as requested and never received a complete copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01925
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 21 June 2000, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years. On 8 May 2002, the applicant received an LOC for failure to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, resulting in vacation of his Article 15 Nonjudicial Punishment, reducing him to the grade of airman, with a new date of rank of 27 November 2001. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01934
On 23 January 2003 after considering the applicant’s rebuttal, the Secretary of the Air Force directed that the applicant’s name be removed from the TDRL and that he be permanently retired because of physical disability at a disability rating of 30%. ____________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request. DPPD states the applicant’s request to be returned to active duty cannot be honored in that he has...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01938
The applicant asserts that since the MFM lost his retraining request (Air Force Form 4032, Application for Enlisted Retraining), he did not qualify for the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) that ended on 30 April 2004. Even though the applicant does not include it in his contentions, it appears there was a delay between the time the Squadron Section Commander approved the retraining package on 15 April 04 and the time it was approved by the Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01939
Therefore, the first date that the applicant was eligible for reenlistment was 1 May 2004. Evidence supports that even though the applicant was eligible to reenlist upon receiving his 3-skill level in June 2003, it appears his action to delay his reenlistment until March 2004 was solely his own choice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 15 September 2004, under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01940
On 31 Mar 04, the Discharge Processing facility (DPRAA), notified the applicant’s squadron commander that it had interviewed the applicant as a possible erroneous entry for law violations. On 2 Apr 04, the applicant was interviewed by his squadron commander as a possible erroneous entry for law violations and to determine if he would be recommended for a waiver. On 16 Apr 04, the squadron commander recommended to the group commander that the applicant be discharged for fraudulent entry...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01943
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01943 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NONE ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam. The Foreign Service Summary on AF Form 7 (Airman’s Military Record) reflects he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01948
It had not been an issue as long as he would reach 20 years and had 10 years commissioned service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01948A
INDEX CODE: 100.10 AFBCMR BC-2004-01948 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01953
INDEX CODE: 112.03 BC-2004-01953 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01954
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01954 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Officer Aircrew Member badge. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01963
INDEX CODE: 128.04 BC-2004-01963 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01964
AFBCMR BC-2004-01964 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01972
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01972 (CASE 3) COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His nonselection for promotion to the grade of major by the Calendar Year 2003B (CY03B) Major Central Selection Board be set aside. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01983
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01983 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01985
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01985 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be changed in item 25a, Specialty Number and Title, to reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 43230, Jet Engine Mechanic, rather than 70250,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01992
His Officer Performance Report (OPR), rendered for the period 9 June 2002 through 30 June 2003 be corrected to show that it was signed, processed, and accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record (OSR) prepared for the Calendar Year 2003A (CY03A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board. Further, although the citation for his JSAM was missing, the board members were fully aware of the decoration as it was listed on the applicant’s CY03A Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and thus,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01994
Members of the Board Mr. Lawrence M. Groner, Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, and Ms. Jean A. Reynolds considered this application on 22 July 2004. LAWRENCE M. GRONER Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, dated 28 Jun 04 AFBCMR BC-2004-01994 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02003
On 27 Aug 02, the applicant's request that he be reinstated to the grade of staff sergeant was considered and partially granted by the Board. JA states his current commander is correct that AFI 35-205 does not prohibit Airmen from promotion consideration when they are returned to duty after completing the RTDP. The JA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His return to duty and suspended...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02004
Details of his evaluation are at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel and applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and provided statements. While we are reluctant to substitute our judgment for that of medical personnel who are qualified to review and make recommendations concerning medical issues, after thoroughly reviewing applicant’s submission and the evidence of record, we believe there is...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02006
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02006 INDEX CODE: 111.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance report (OPR) ending 9 April 2001, be replaced with a new OPR and Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the CY02 (12 Nov 02) (P0502B) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02007
In support of her request, the applicant submits a personal statement, DD Form 214 certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and case documents from the Air Force Discharge Review Board. On 13 September 2003, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) requesting her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable, change of reason for separation and change of RE code. (Exhibit B) The applicant was initially...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02010
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02010 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). In addition, the servicemember must be attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02012
Per JFTR paragraph U5012-I, a written time extension that includes an explanation of circumstances justifying the extension may: 1) be authorized/approved for a specific additional time period using the Secretarial Process; 2) be authorized or approved only when circumstances prevent use within the prescribed time, and must be for the shortest time appropriate under the circumstances; 3) not be granted merely to accommodate personal preferences or conveniences (DoD/CG #99-1); and 4) not be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02013
The applicant contends her late husband completed over 19½ years of service, spent time away from his family due to military activation, remained in the same unit for an entire career, looked forward to his retirement, and made an RCSBP election for full coverage for her and their son. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, the Board is of the opinion the servicemember’s record should reflect he completed 20 years of satisfactory service to qualify...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02014
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02014 INDEX NUMBER: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he filed a timely election for former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). On 28 Jun 04, AFPC requested the member provide a copy of his marriage certificate to both his former...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02015
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02015 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to enable her to explore future enlistment possibilities with the Armed Forces. In support of her application, the applicant provides copies of her...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02023
Since the letter was provided more than six months following the delivery of the shipment, ECAF contacted the carrier, only to discover that the carrier representative who signed the statement was not familiar with the shipment and that she, at the applicant’s request, identified items of PBP&E on the inventory per his request. In this case, reviews of the inventories reveal there were no items identified as PBP&E during the move. Following receipt of ECAF’s 14 May 2004 letter, he...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02024
SBP premium were deducted from the servicemember’s retired pay until February 2003 when the finance center suspended the spouse portion of his SBP. We do not take issue with the applicant’s contention her divorce decree ordered her deceased former husband to provide former spouse coverage for her under the SBP, but he did not do so. However, in the absence of a showing the applicant is legally entitled to the relief sought or a waiver of entitlement from the current spouse, we conclude she...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02027
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02027 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). The applicant flew 32 combat missions as a B-24 pilot and was a prisoner of war from 31 December 1944 to 8 May 1945. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR 02-00931 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02029
There is no indication in the records that either the applicant or C. submitted a request to change the SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse within the one- year time period. Nonetheless, at this time, his former spouse is not the legal beneficiary of the SBP election. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2004-02029 in Executive Session on 24 September 2004, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02033
AFBCMR BC-2004-02033 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating APPLICANT, be corrected to show he was honorably discharged on 3 March 2004, and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 4 March 2004 for a period of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02034
According to an AFOSI Report of Investigation (ROI), dated 3 Mar 89, an investigation was conducted around the period of 23 Jan - 7 Feb 89. On 6 Mar 89, the commander notified the applicant of his intent to recommend separation with a general discharge based on the Article 15. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02036
AFBCMR BC-2004-02036 INDEX CODE: 131.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02037
Letters have been provided by his rater, additional rater, and reviewer supporting his request for correction of his OPR and SSB consideration. The applicant was approaching his in-the-promotion zone board and the contested report was the top report in his selection record. In support of his request, the applicant provided evidence from his rating chain, which has led us to believe reasonable doubt exists as to whether or not the contested report, as written, accurately portrays their...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02039
The base legal office reviewed the case file and found it legally sufficient to support the discharge and recommended an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without probation and rehabilitation (P&R). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02040
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRRP states in accordance with 10 USC, Section 1208, the time the applicant spent on the TDRL is not creditable service for retirement. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his time on the TDRL should be credited as active duty time. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02041
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02041 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His dismissal from the Air Force be upgraded to honorable. c. On 17 Dec 85, the applicant submitted a resignation in lieu of court-martial (RILO) request. On 13 Aug 87, the Secretary of the Air Force...