RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01903
INDEX NUMBER: 107.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should receive the PH for burns and injuries he incurred on 19 February
1952, at a forward air base in Korea.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of the citation to
accompany the award of the Soldier’s Medal he received for his heroism on
19 February 1952, when a firebomb exploded while assisting in the parking
of a B-26 aircraft. In addition, he submits extracts from his medical
records documenting the treatment he received.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant is a former airplane mechanic that served in the Regular Air
Force on active duty from 7 July 1949 to 7 January 1953.
On 19 February 1952, at Kunsan, Korea, while parking a B-26 aircraft, a 100-
pound M-97 incendiary bomb that was lying by the loading ramp exploded ten
feet from the ground crew. The exploding particles ignited the clothing of
the men, resulting in serious burns. Disregarding the burns and injuries
he sustained, applicant immediately went to the assistance of his companion
and extinguished the flames.
A Clinical Record, dated 19 February 1952, indicates applicant was admitted
to the emergency room and received medical treatment for first, second, and
third degree burns of his face, arms, and hands incurred on that date.
On 25 May 1952, he was awarded the Soldier’s Medal for heroism not
involving actual conflict with an enemy on 19 February 1952.
The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions
(i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced
aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). In addition, it is necessary the wound
required or received treatment by medical personnel. Indirect injuries do
not meet the criteria for award of the PH.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
applicant’s injuries were not the direct result of enemy action. The M-97
firebomb that exploded belonged to the United States or our allies.
The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The M-97 firebomb will not explode unless the cotter pin safety device is
removed letting the propeller rotate. An enemy of the U.S. removed the
pin. His injury was caused by the bomb exploding and was the direct result
of enemy action.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. In this respect, we note the PH is
awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions and it is
necessary the wound required or received treatment by medical personnel.
Applicant contends he sustained injuries when a firebomb exploded, as a
result of the cotter pin being removed by an enemy of the United States.
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the documentation
provided by applicant, we find insufficient evidence to substantiate the
explosion was the direct result of enemy action. The evidence of record
indicates that while parking a B-26 aircraft, a 100-pound M-97 incendiary
bomb that was lying by the loading ramp exploded. Further, for his actions
during the incident, applicant was awarded the Soldier’s Medal for heroism
not involving actual conflict with an enemy. The personal sacrifice
applicant endured for his country and his selfless act of heroism is noted
and our decision in no way diminishes the high regard we have for his
service; however, insufficient documentary evidence has been presented to
demonstrate that he was injured as a direct result of enemy action.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-01903
in Executive Session on 1 September 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 May 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 2 Aug 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Aug 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 17 Aug 04.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01774
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that there is no documentation the applicant was awarded the PH or BSM, with “V” device. The personal sacrifice the applicant endured for his country is noted and our decision in no way lessens his service; however, absent a showing that his injuries where the direct result of enemy action, we find no basis upon which to recommend...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Recognition Programs Branch, AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed the application and states that a member must provide documentation to support the injury was a direct result of enemy action. Since there is no evidence in the applicant’s records that he has been injured as a direct result of enemy action, they recommend denial of his request to be awarded the PH. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02254
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the PH since he was wounded in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that they could not find any support for award of the PH. Should the applicant provide evidence that he was injured as a direct result of enemy action, the Board will...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00818
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00818 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). As a result of the injury, his second and third toes of his right foot were amputated. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01330
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01330 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 01 NOVEMBER 2007 __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal and any other decorations for his service in Vietnam. He feels this was a result of enemy action, and that he was treated for the shrapnel...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03970
The PH Medal is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, force aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial noting the applicants injuries do not meet the criteria for award of the PH Medal. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01253 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) and the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). When he returned to base, he was told that all four of the aircraft’s gun barrels had burned out as a result of the continuous firing, rather than the required...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03464 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that there is no evidence to support that the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03152
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03152 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: Clackmas County Veterans Service Ofc HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 18 FEBRUARY 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH), the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM), the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit F. In a letter to his Senator dated 23 July 1997, the applicant provided a witness' statement from his supervisor at the time and asked that he be awarded the PH. In a combat support role, applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action. On 7 December 1994, the PH Review Board denied his request for the award, stating that the documentation furnished on his behalf, in accordance with established criteria, did not...