AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03877
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of a letter from his squadron commander to the wing staff judge advocate, dated 25 Jun 01, outlining why the applicant did not meet retention requirements. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03880
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03880 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: MARK S. COHEN HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His other than honorable conditions (OTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. At that time he was only 19 years old. Counsel’s response is at Exhibit F. On 22 January 2004, the Board staff requested the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03882
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03882 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the addition of the “V” device to his Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03892
In support of his application, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, his Airman Performance Report for the period 9 April through 7 July 1975 and an AFPC/DPPPRA letter, dated 26 September 2003, confirming his entitlement and correction to his records for the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03893
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03893 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, bilateral patellofemoral syndrome and tinnitus, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. In support of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03894
AFBCMR BC-2003-03894 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03895
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2003-03895 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03897
BC-2003-03897, et al MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the individuals listed on the attached roster be corrected to show that they...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03898
The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. In an additional DPPPR advisory, dated 22 June 2004, DPPPR indicates a member must provide documentation to support he/she was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and the injury received, or required, medical treatment by medical personnel. The applicant’s rebuttal, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. A copy of the additional Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 June 2004 for review and response within 14 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03904
BC-2003-03904, et al MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the individuals listed on the attached roster be corrected to show that they...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03905
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Retiree Services Branch, AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and recommended denial stating there is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice. The member’s claim that he was not briefed on the one-year time period to add a spouse should he marry after retirement is without merit. DPPTR states that if the Board’s decision is to grant relief, the member’s record should be corrected to show that on...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03906
When a member declares PBP&E and the carrier fails to record and weigh the items, credit may be given if the traffic management office (TMO) documents the items and weight upon delivery. Review of the applicant’s HHG inventory and other shipping documents reveal that no items were identified as PBP&E during the shipment in question. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03907
On 4 March 1980, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand for failing to report to his duty section at the prescribed time. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03910
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In 1968, the Discharge Review Board (DRB) changed the discharge authority from AFM 39-12 to AFM 39-10. Cause for the charge was “Loss in shipment or thru neglect.” [See Exhibit A] On 20 Feb 68, the applicant applied to the DRB to change the discharge authority from AFM 39-12, Unsuitability, to AFM 39-10, Convenience of the Government. On 14 Oct 68, HQ AFAFC advised him that AFM 39-12 required...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03911
A review of his medical records failed to show that his back injury was sustained on 12 Nov 65 as a result of a missile motor slipping its cradle during assembly in support of combat training missions. The Medical Consultant states a single medical record entry indicates he presented for lumbosacral back pain on 12 Nov 65 but no mechanism of injury is documented and there are no work-site accident or injury reports present in the records that may provide additional information. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03917
On 14 February 1974, he requested discharge for the good of the service. The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) reviewed and considered the applicant’s case for change of his discharge and concluded that a change was not warranted. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03919
AFBCMR BC-2003-03919 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03920
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/DPM recommended denial noting the applicant was in a retraining status at the time of her promotion to TSgt and did not have a three- skill level in the promotion AFSC as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. AFRC/DPM indicated that as a result of the applicant’s DOR being changed to 1 Mar 02, she did not meet the two- year minimum time in grade requirement for promotion to the grade...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03923
In support of her request, the applicant has submitted a copy of her late husband’s death certificate, and a copy of a letter from the National Personnel Records Center dated 12 November 2003. Applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors in the discharge processing, nor provide facts that support upgrading the discharge to honorable (Exhibit C). Novel, Panel Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Nov 03, with attachments.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03930
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He entered the Air Force as a first lieutenant, accessing at this grade with three years of professional credit. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded one additional year of constructive service credit and was appointed...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03931
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-03931 INDEX CODE 131.01 111.01 111.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 9 Feb 01 and the Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) for the Calendar Year 2002A (CY02A) Major Central Selection Board be removed from his records and he be promoted to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03939
_________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/DPRCE noted that during his activation, the applicant received TDY entitlements in accordance with the JFTR. HQ USAF/DPRCE also noted the applicant submitted 15 accrual (advance) vouchers, none of which reflected the trips back to Stanhope. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03940
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 6 Feb 04 for review and response. The evidence of record indicates that during his activation, and while in a TDY status, the applicant made several trips from Willow Grove ARS to his home in Allentown, PA. Also during his activation, he submitted a number of interim travel vouchers, none of which reflected his trips...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03942
Time spent in medical school does not count in determining base pay.” He was considered on reserve status, with a paydate listed as 8 January 2000 while in the Armed Forces Financial Assistance Program (FAP) which further led him to believe he would be paid with more than two years of service when he entered active duty. Information maintained in the Personnel Data System indicates his Total Years Service Date is 8 January 1996 and his Paydate is 24 June 2002. DPAMF2 states that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03948
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03948 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect the award of the Purple Heart (PH). To be awarded the Purple Heart (PH), a member must provide documentation to support that wounds were a direct result of enemy action and that the wounds required or received...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03951
INDEX CODE: 121.03 BC-2003-03951 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03953
According to Title 10 U.S.C., Section 1448 (a)(2), members must complete an election within 90 days of receipt; otherwise the member remains eligible to make an election at age 60. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that the entitlements were meant for the retiree to receive and only his signature on the application for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03954
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2003-03954 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03955
AFBCMR BC-2003-03955 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03957
AFBCMR BC-2003-03957 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03961
He accepted the discharge for being absent without leave (AWOL), but regrets that decision to this date. As of this date, this office has received no response. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03964
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03964 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03967
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Before his death, her husband told her that he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal while serving in Vietnam. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states she is not asking for her husband to be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03967-2
The former member served in Vietnam between the period 7 November 1966 and 24 October 1967. On 11 May 2004, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request for award of the PH to her husband. We note the applicant’s assertions that her late husband claimed to have been awarded the Purple Heart Medal while serving in Vietnam; however, she did not provide any documentary evidence to substantiate her claim, such as a detailed account regarding her husband’s injury or eyewitness...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03971
Members of the Board, Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Ms. Martha Maust, and Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, considered this application on 2 March 2004. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 16 Jan 04, w/atch BC-2003-03971 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03972
INDEX CODE: 137.01 BC-2003-03972 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03973
Officers considered for promotion boards have different closeout dates for their performance reports. Based on the evidence provided, recommend his request for SSB consideration be denied. The DPPPO complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A Copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Jan 04, for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03975
INDEX CODE: 121.03 BC-2003-03975 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03980
The DPPPWB complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Feb 04, for review and comment within 30 days. Therefore, in the absence of clear-cut evidence that the applicant's record would have been scored sufficiently high to warrant his selection for promotion by the board in question, favorable action on his request for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03981
DPM states in accordance with AFI 36-2612, a member's HYT date will be the first day of the month following the date equal to the member's pay date plus 33 years, not to exceed age 60. This date, minus the six years of prior service correctly established a pay date of 21 Feb 70. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03983
As of his reenlistment date, his AFSC was not authorized a Zone A SRB. Member had only 3 years and 29 days total active federal military service as of his reenlistment date and therefore is not authorized a Zone B SRB. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that at the time the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03986
On 24 May 57, he received an Article 15 for failure to repair for squadron detail. On that same date, applicant acknowledged receipt of the administrative discharge action and waived his entitlement to appear before a board of officers and requested discharge in lieu of board proceedings. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03989
In support of his application, the applicant provides a personal statement and copies of his of his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) findings; Psychiatric Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL) Summary; Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) findings; discharge certificate; DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty; prescription for Albuterol; and an article on inhalers containing Albuterol. On 3 July 2000, the applicant was relieved from active duty and placed on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03990
He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge from the Air Force and confinement for 142 days. In an additional letter to the Board, the applicant states he was on appellate review leave for over a year prior to receiving his DD Form 214. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003- 03990 in Executive Session on 31 Mar 04, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair Ms....
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03994
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03994 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records do not reflect that in 1968 he served in Vietnam for 30 days and in China for 15 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03997
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03997 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is attached at Exhibit C. The applicant’s records were administratively corrected on 12 Jul 00 to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03999
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03999 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so he may reenter the military. The Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04002
The applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 7 December 1964 under the provisions of AFR 39-16 (apathy and defective attitude) and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. While reviewing the applicant’s records, it was discovered that there was an error on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States, Report of Transfer or Discharge, effective 7 December 1964. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04003
His discharge documents for the periods in question reflect he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, Air Force Commendation Medal, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, Air Force Longevity Service Award Ribbon, with four Oak Leaf Clusters (4OLC), Air Force Good Conduct Medal (1 Silver OLC), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. However, should the applicant provide the above information or testimony from other former members of his unit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04004
A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states his package contained information showing that favoritism and racism were prevalent in his squadron. While the majority notes the applicant indicates two of his rating chain members was allegedly charged and convicted of racial discrimination, he has not provided...