RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03989
INDEX CODE: 108.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His military records be corrected to remove the diagnosis of
schizophreniform disorder and to allow him to reenlist in the military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His diagnosis of schizophreniform disorder is false and unjust. His
medical problems were as a result of an adverse reaction to the medication
albuterol. All of his records beginning March 2000 should be reviewed for
malpractice due to a misdiagnosis. He is too young for such a limiting and
harmful ending to his career. He feels he should be justly compensated for
all the pain and suffering that he and his family have had to endure. If
possible he would like to reenlist.
In support of his application, the applicant provides a personal statement
and copies of his of his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) findings;
Psychiatric Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL) Summary; Physical
Evaluation Board (PEB) findings; discharge certificate; DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty; prescription for
Albuterol; and an article on inhalers containing Albuterol. The
applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 April 1998, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age
of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years. On 18
September 1998, after completing basic training and technical training, the
applicant was assigned as a law enforcement apprentice. He was
progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3) effective
and with a date of rank of 1 August 1999.
On 19 July 1999, his commander withdrew the applicant’s authority to bear
and have access to firearms due to concern over the applicant’s mental well
being. On 18 October 1999, the applicant was approved for retraining into
satellite and wideband communications equipment maintenance and repair. On
20 March 2000, while attending technical training, the applicant was
hospitalized for psychiatric evaluation after complaining of psychotic
symptoms for the prior three months. The final diagnosis was
schizophreniform disorder, manifested by auditory and visual
hallucinations, delusions of thought insertion, thought broadcasting, and
predicting the future. Alternative diagnoses of schizophrenia,
schizoaffective disorder and schizotypal personality disorder were
considered and discussed in the medical evaluation.
On 4 April 2000, the applicant’s records met an MEB. The MEB determined
the applicant’s condition did not exist prior to service and that it was
incurred while entitled to basic pay. The MEB findings stated the
applicant’s medical condition rendered him unqualified for worldwide duty
and recommended his case be presented to the Informal Physical Evaluation
Board (IPEB). The IPEB findings, dated 24 April 2000, stated the applicant
was unfit because of physical disability and recommended he be temporarily
retired with a 30% compensable rating. The applicant agreed with the
findings and recommendation of the board and consequently, on 16 May 2000,
the Secretary of the Air Force directed the applicant’s name be placed on
the TDRL under the provisions of 10 United States Code (USC), Section 1202.
On 3 July 2000, the applicant was relieved from active duty and placed on
the TDRL with a compensable rating of 30% for physical disability effective
4 July 2000.
On 2 July 2001 an IPEB reevaluated the applicant’s condition. The IPEB’s
findings, dated 13 July 2001, noted that the applicant’s condition was in
remission; however, it remained markedly impaired for military service.
The IPEB recommended the applicant be discharged with severance pay and
with a disability rating of 0%. On 31 July 2001, the applicant concurred
with the IPEB’s findings. On 7 August 2001, the Secretary of the Air Force
directed that the applicant’s name be removed from the TDRL and he be
discharged with severance pay under the provisions of 10 USC 1203.
On 27 August 2001, the applicant’s name was removed from the TDRL and he
was discharged by reason of physical disability per AFI 36-3212 with
entitlement to disability severance pay. He had served two years, three
months and three days on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the
applicant’s records is warranted. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that
the onset of the applicant’s symptoms that was diagnosed as
schizophreniform disorder was prior to his prescription for an Albuterol
inhaler. In addition, Albuterol inhalers may cause symptoms such as
increased irritability and nervousness that may intensify anxiety in
existing conditions; however, it does not cause psychosis or
schizophreniform disorder. It is the BCMR Medical Consultant’s opinion
that action and disposition in this case were proper and equitable
reflecting compliance with Air Force directives that implement the law.
The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15
June 2004, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The record shows that less than sixteen
months after the applicant’s enlistment, he was decertified to carry a
weapon due to Adjustment Disorder and subsequently was approved for cross
training into another career field. While attending technical training,
the applicant was hospitalized for psychiatric evaluation after complaining
of psychotic symptoms. The evaluation led to the above-cited diagnosis.
Applicant’s assertions were thoroughly reviewed by the BCMR Medical
Consultant and we concur with the BCMR Medical Consultant’s opinion and
find the applicant has failed to sustain his burden for providing a showing
of error or injustice. Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not
favorably considered.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 11 August 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-03989
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Dec 03, with atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 7 Jun 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Jun 04.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00582
The CI was removed from TDRL, and medically separated with a 10% Service disability rating. At that time, he was working 35 hours per week, and was enrolled in college. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00683
At the time of removal from the TDRL, the IPEB determined that the evidence of the medical evaluation warranted a rating less than 30 percent and, with his concurrence, the applicant was discharged with severance pay in accordance with law and DOD policy. A service medical record entry after the PEB recommending placement on the TDRL but before the effective date and separation from active duty dated 20 October 1994 indicates the applicant was doing well without symptoms while on...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00721
The PEB adjudicated the asthma condition as unfitting, rated 30%; with application of Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and the CI was placed on Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) at 30%. Although originally prescribed a daily use inhaled maintenance/preventive medication, the CI elected to discontinue the medication and at final separation there was no indication that a daily-use inhalation preventive medication was used or prescribed. The NARSUM...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011808
The PEB recommended a 30% disability rating based on her diagnosis of schizophreniform disorder. The PEB investigates the nature, cause, degree of severity, and probable permanency of the disability of Soldiers whose cases are referred to the board. There is no evidence showing that the side effects of Acyclovir were the cause of the behavior diagnosed as schizophreniform disorder.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01583
In addition, the CI was notified by the Service that his case qualifies for review of his mental health (MH) condition in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnoses were unfavorably changed or eliminated during that process. Accordingly, the case file was reviewed regarding unfavorable diagnosis change, fitness...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01026
Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied. Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02517
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the narrative reason for separation on applicant’s DD Form 214, issued at the time of his placement on the TDRL accurately reflects the reason for his discharge from active duty. When members are removed from the TDRL a new DD Form 214 is not issued because the DD Form 214 reflects active duty time and time on the...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00941
(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The initial narrative summary (NARSUM) and PEB considered the CI unfitting for asthma compounded by vocal cord dysfunction and rated the CI under (analogously to) the asthma coding criteria...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01684
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: All of his medical records concerning a 6 November 2002 psychiatric consult and all follow-up consults were not available for the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). On 5 February 2001, an Informal PEB (IPEB) found him unfit due to Major Depressive Disorder with definite social and industrial adaptability impairment and recommended he be placed on the TDRL with a 30% rating. The BCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01356
He was not informed that due to his time in service and nature of his disability that he was eligible for a medical retirement rather than separation. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical Consultant states at the time of initial alcohol abuse diagnosis in 1997, there were no other behavioral problems or symptoms suggesting PTSD noted in the medical records.