AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03984
In support of her application, the applicant submits a copy of her Family Coverage Election form, dated 4 October 2002; and a copy of her leave and earnings statement, dated 1-30 November 2002. Since the applicant did not provide the additional information requested in order to sufficiently evaluate her claim, it is our opinion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03986
AFBCMR BC-2002-03986 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03987
AFBCMR BC-2002-03987 INDEX CODE: 135.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03988
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Ms. Kathleen Graham, and Mr. James W. Russell III, considered this application on 19 February 2003. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSFM, dtd 23 Jan 03 AFBCMR 02-03988 INDEX CODE:...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03991
On 30 Jun 99 at 0810, the Squadron Section Commander called to check on the applicant’s outprocessing. The applicant completed his outprocessing on 1 Jul 99. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03996
INDEX CODE: 112.00 AFBCMR BC-2002-03996 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03998
INDEX CODE 128.05 AFBCMR BC-2002-03998 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04001
However, prior to his promotion to the grade of senior airman (E- 4), there was a change in command and he failed Air Force weight standards and his promotion was withheld. After thoroughly reviewing the available evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice. Furthermore, RE code 4J is a code that can be waived for prior service enlistment consideration, provided applicant meets all other requirements for enlistment under an...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04005
Members of the Board Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Mr. Roscoe Hinton, and Mr. William H. Anderson, considered this application on 26 June 2003. JOSEPH A. ROJ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFRC/SG, dtd 19 May 03 AFBCMR BC-2002-04005 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04006
AFBCMR BC-2002-04006 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04009
AFPC/DPW complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 March 2003, for review and comment. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for the FSGLI premiums he paid from June 2002 to August 2002. Applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04010
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04010 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to contribute a lump sum of $2,700 to the Veterans Education Assistance Program (VEAP), his VEAP account reflect activity beginning in 1982, and he be granted an opportunity to rollover from VEAP to the Montgomery GI...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04013
We are not persuaded by the evidence presented that the uncharacterized entry-level separation received by the former member should be changed to an honorable discharge. Rather, as was noted by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, an entry- level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of service at the time separation proceedings were, for whatever reason, initiated. However, after a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04014
On or about 6 Dec 99, applicant failed to report to duty on time and on or about 9 and 10 Dec 99, he failed to report to duty (Physical Training), for which he received a letter of counseling (LOC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to the applicant’s medical condition while on active duty are contained in the AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation at Exhibit C. On 21 Aug 00, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) found that neither evidence of record, nor that provided by...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04019
The BCMR Consultant states that according to the applicant’s Air National Guard Point Summary, the applicant was not on active duty during his 1982 hospitalization. On 24 November 1982, the applicant underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) that concluded his depression was not incurred while entitled to basic pay and recommended medical disqualification and administrative discharge (not disability discharge). The applicant has not provided any evidence to show an injustice occurred at...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04021
On 20 Nov 91, the discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed that the applicant be issued an entry level separation. The applicant did not provide any evidence showing the information in the discharge case file was erroneous, his substantial rights were violated, or that his commanders abused their discretionary authority. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04023
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect overseas duty served in Guam; however, his records are unavailable and the applicant has not provided any documentation in support of his claim. Therefore, we are unable to ascertain whether or not an error exists in his military record. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04029 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. A complete copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04030
Members of the Board, Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Mr. Frederick R. Beaman, III, and Mr. Albert J. Starnes, considered this application on 26 February 2003. Ltr, AFPC/ DPPTR, dtd 31 Jan 03, w/atch AFBCMR BC-2002-04030 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04031
The convening authority, the Air Force Court of Military Review, the United States Court of Military Appeals, and the Secretary of the Air Force all determined a dismissal accurately characterized his military service and his crimes. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 27 Jun 03 for review...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04033
AFBCMR BC-2002-04033 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04036
The Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) was not convinced by the documentation submitted by the applicant and denied his request. DPPPE further states that Air Force policy is that an evaluation report is accurate as written when it becomes a matter of record. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: Upon review of the Air Force evaluations, the applicant states the EPR appeal board stated the gortex jacket and boots...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04038
INDEX CODE 128.05 AFBCMR BC-2002-04038 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04040
ANG/DPPI’s evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s vice commander (WADS/CV) responded on behalf of the applicant and notes that the ANG/DPPI evaluation, while factually correct, does not address circumstantial process shortfalls particular to the applicant’s case. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04042
SSgt --- correctly states the fact that since the time the AF Form 24 was signed, she has performed her duties as an officer in the Air Force and has been promoted to 1Lt. Again, this information does not accurately reflect her career as an officer in the Air Force and in no way should this information appear someday to a major’s board. After reviewing the evidence of record, which includes a statement from her commander, the Board believes that the entry in question was not relevant to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04043
He inquired again about the debt and this time he was told it was invalid and that the accounting and finance representative would notify the Defense Accounting and Finance Service (DFAS). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 6 January 2003, he applied for a waiver of his indebtedness incurred as a result of overpayment...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04046
Members of the Board, Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Ms. Mary J. Johnson, and Mr. Vaughn Schlunz, considered this application on 6 May 2003. ROSCOE HINTON JR Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, ANG/DPPI, dtd 13 Mar 03, w/atch BC-2002-04046 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04050
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial and stated that based upon documentation in file, they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The Air Force Discharge Review Board denied his request for upgrade on 25 June 1998. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04051
A 3 Dec 99 ice test conducted by a civilian provider concluded that her history of hives was resolved and there was no evidence of urticaria. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded with a personal statement and a letter from her primary care physician, a captain at McConnell AFB, KS. However, since the AFBCMR Medical Consultant advises that this...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04052
Specification 3: He did, on or about 13 December 1955, without proper authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to the office of the Commander. He did not seem to be able to adjust to the Air Force, his job or the men for whom he worked. On 2 December 1958, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his undesirable discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04053
The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that based upon the documentation in the file, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation at the time. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04054
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRRP states the applicant’s retirement application was processed under the 7-day option program, which stipulates that service members who are assigned overseas who wish to retire and are eligible for retirement, must request a retirement date which is the first day of the month following DEROS. The applicant when he applied for retirement on 19 December 2000 was ineligible for promotion consideration in accordance with promotion...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04056
On 26 November 1956, the discharge authority approved the discharge and ordered an undesirable discharge effective 5 December 1956. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation and the FBI report were forwarded to the applicant on 7 March 2003 and 3 April 2003 for review and comment (Exhibits D and F). In our opinion, the cited statements are not of a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04057
On 16 February 1984, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge for misconduct. On 13 March 1984, the discharge authority approved the recommended separation and directed that the applicant be issued a general discharge. On 3 March 1985, the applicant applied to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) to have his RE code of 2B changed.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04058
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW was able to document applicant’s claim of being a POW and consequently recommended his discharge document reflect that he was a POW and he be considered for award of the Purple Heart Medal. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends the records be corrected as indicated below. JOHN L. ROBUCK Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04061
It was never fixed up to present day and he has paid $420 into the SGLI, which he did not want. After receiving the applicant’s DD Form 149 dated 19 December 2002, they need additional information to sufficiently evaluate his claim and make an appropriate recommendation. They did not receive any response from the applicant.. AFPC/DPW complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04075
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-04075 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), 4th Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC), for the period 1 January 1997 through 30 November 2000 be considered in the promotion process for cycle 02E7 to the grade of Master Sergeant. Current Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04076
In this case, the commander concluded that the applicant had assaulted his wife. Finally, although the actions taken against the applicant may have been instigated by his ex-wife’s allegations against him, the commander only took action after an investigation by the OSI substantiated misconduct on the applicant’s part. Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 May 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04077
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Edward C. Koenig, III, Ms. Martha Maust, and Mr. John E. Pettit, considered this application on 30 January 2003. AFBCMR 02-04077 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04079
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should receive the PH for a wound he received as a direct result of enemy action on 25 March 1945. He did not refer to any medical treatment he might have received or provide any documentation showing that he did received any medical treatment for leg injuries incurred on 25 March 1943. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04081
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC 2002-04081 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered on him for the period 21 Jul 01 through 20 Jul 02 be included in his officer selection record (OSR) for the calendar year 2002B (CY02B) (3 Oct 02) Central...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04082
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04082 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded. -- On 21 May 81, applicant was notified of his commander's intent to impose nonjudicial punishment on him under Article 15, UCMJ. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04086
Dental records reflect that the applicant received a complete dental examination and all appropriate dental services and treatment within 90 days prior to separation. BCMR Medical Consultant complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 April 2003, for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04088
General Court-Martial Order #15, dated 29 February 1968 indicates that the sentence to a bad conduct discharge, confinement and forfeitures were vacated and that the punishment would be executed. While the applicant believes his bad conduct discharge should be upgraded due to the unfair treatment and excessive sentence he received, we note that the approved sentence of the military court was within the maximum punishment authorized by the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04089
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04089 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4D (senior airman or sergeant with at least nine years total active military service but fewer than sixteen years) be changed to enable her to reenter the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04091
On 16 April 1998, the applicant was offered nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for failure to go at the time prescribed to his place of duty on 3 and 10 April 1998. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant provided documents from a civilian sleep lab indicating he was diagnosed with severe sleep apnea during a sleep evaluation performed on 13 March 2002, over two years after his discharge. We find no evidence of error in this...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04092
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04092 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 1994A (CY94A) Lieutenant Colonel Judge Advocate General (JAG) Central Selection Board, and any subsequent boards where...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04095
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Gregory Petkoff, Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb, and Mr. Billy C. Baxter considered this application on 25 February 2003. AFBCMR 02-04095 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04096
He is now requesting reinstatement to active duty as a follow-on to his selection for promotion. The Board accepts the recommendation of the Air Force that he should be reinstated to active duty based on his selection for promotion. Therefore, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04097
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04097 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement date of 8 December 2002 be changed to 8 January 2003 to allow him to take his 30 days of leave. On 18 October 2002, 1 AF/CC requested a 60-day extension to his recall to active duty (Atch 2). Recommend that the AFBCMR allow the member...