RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-04043
INDEX CODE: 128.10
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His indebtedness to the government in the amount of $926.12, be waived.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
After his permanent change of station (PCS) move from Kadena AB Japan, to
Offutt AFB NE, in May 2001 an unexplained debt of $750 appeared on his
leave and earnings statement (LES). He was told that it was a PCS related
debt and that it would be further explained to him and his debt was
suspended. The debt remained on his LES and his requests for an
explanation as to how he incurred the debt went unanswered for months. In
February 2002, he applied for retirement and again inquired about the debt
and his question did not get answered. In March 2002, he entered an
extension and entered into a no-pay due status because of problem with
MilMod. He had to complete a voucher each payday until his terminal leave
departure date to get paid. In May 2002, a deduction of $29 a month
started coming out of his pay. He inquired again about the debt and this
time he was told it was invalid and that the accounting and finance
representative would notify the Defense Accounting and Finance Service
(DFAS). When he received his final pay it was approximately $600 more than
he expected. He reported the overpayment to the finance office but was
told that the payment was correct. In addition to being in a no pay
status, he was not charged for any leave he took for the last 10 - 11
months while he was on active duty. He had to estimate his remaining leave
balance and calculate the amount of terminal leave he would be taking. His
balance was verified by the finance office. On 23 Nov 02, he received
notification that he had a debt of over $900. It was explained that the
debt was due to excess leave. Personnel at the finance office at Offutt
AFB told him that the debt was a result of the overpayment on his last
paycheck. He inquired about applying for a waiver of the debt but was told
that it would take up to 6 months to process. He feels that the debts were
not his fault and that the debt was accrued without his knowledge.
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, a
letter from an accounting and finance technician, his Statement of Military
Pay Account, his Statement of Military Leave Account, and his notification
of indebtedness. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant retired from the Air Force on 31 Aug 02 in the grade of
master sergeant. On 20 Nov 02, applicant was notified of an indebtedness
to the government in the amount of $962.12 for 3.5 days of excess leave and
pay and allowances that he received while he was in an excess leave status.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
DFAS-POCC/DE recommends denial. DFAS states that the Waivers and
Remissions Branch states that the applicant's request for a waiver would be
denied based on guidelines set forth by the Office of the Secretary of the
Air Force. The Waivers and Remissions Branch states that when the
applicant received his final pay and believed it was more than he was
authorized, he should have pursued the matter further and should have
retained the erroneous funds for eventual refund to the government. In
addition, the applicant had a responsibility to be aware of his leave
balance. When he started terminal leave on 1 Jul 02, he did not take into
consideration July 31 and August 31. He was charged for those 2 days of
leave. His leave balance was based on his expiration of term of service
(ETS) date of 15 Sep 02. Therefore, when he elected to separate on 31 Aug,
he should have deducted 1.5 days of leave from his balance to ETS on his
LES. The DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant states that he applied for a waiver on 6 Jan 03 and it was denied
on 9 Jan 03. He does not feel that DFAS has carefully considered his
request since it took them 3 days to deny his request when he was told it
would take 6 months. He feels that he meets the requirements set forth by
the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force for a waiver. The debt was an
administrative error caused by MilMod and the local finance office as
explained by a memo from the finance office. To say that he intentionally
frauded or misrepresented the government is not true and clearly not
proven. The finance office verified his leave days before his terminal
leave started. He took exactly what they said he could, if they cannot
figure out how many days of leave he has, applicant wonders how could he be
expected to. When he received his final pay it appeared to be high and he
contacted finance and was told that it was correct. He had never retired
before and did not know what to expect. DFAS never addressed the lengthy
time he spent with an erroneous debt on his LES that DFAS would not remove
even though the local finance office sent numerous requests for its
removal. His complete submission is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice that would warrant corrective action. It
is our opinion that the errors in the applicant’s pay records, which led to
his overpayment of leave and pay and allowances, was not a result of any
act or misrepresentation on his part, but was perpetuated by errors in the
military pay system. The applicant promptly reported the discrepancies in
his pay records to accounting and finance personnel and we believe that he
made every reasonable effort to ensure his pay records were accurate. The
Board does not believe that it would be appropriate to hold the applicant
accountable for the disparity in his leave balance when finance and
accounting technicians were unable to determine his correct balance.
Accordingly, it is our opinion that relief is warranted and we recommend
that his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 6 January 2003, he applied for a
waiver of his indebtedness incurred as a result of overpayment of his final
separation pay and his application was approved by competent authority.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2002-4043 in
Executive Session on 9 Apr 03, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Billy C. Baxter, Member
Ms. Martha Maust, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Dec 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, DFAS-POCC/DE, dated 9 Jan 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jan 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 22 Jan 03
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2002-04043
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 6 January 2003, he
applied for a waiver of his indebtedness incurred as a result of
overpayment of his final separation pay and his application was approved by
competent authority.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005554C071029
On 3 August 2005 the applicant made a telephonic inquiry concerning his debt to the Government for overpayment of base pay. The summary of the base pay audit showed the following results: a. during the period from January 2004 through September 2005, the applicant was entitled to $61,937.15 in pay and received $61,937.15, plus an overpayment in base pay of $9,410.89. k. DFAS had failed to adjust the level of his pay which resulted in his being overpaid $9,410.89 in base pay from 1 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00255
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00255 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be provided a waiver for his indebtedness to the Air Force as a result of being paid after he separated from active duty. He did not receive a Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) or other mail after he separated from active duty, because he began...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022844
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * a letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Alexandria, VA (HRC-ALX) * a DD Form 1172 (Application for Uniformed Services Identification Card - DEERS Enrollment * a DD Form 93-E (Record of Emergency Data) * an SGLV-8286 (E) (Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate) * a DA Form 3508 (Application for Remission or Cancellation of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009793
Had DFAS processed his request, he would not have the debt. The form shows he requested to stop BAQ and that he had been assigned to government quarters. To determine injustice the application must contain evidence that the applicant did not know and could not have known of the error and/or the applicant inquired of a proper authority and was told the payment was correct.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03756
After the birth of her second child, she and her fiancée went to the Finance office to update the information on her second child. She also could not expect to receive BAH with dependent spouse BAH when she had no housing costs. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the Board majority agrees with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the applicant reasonably could not expect to receive BAH at the with- dependent rate...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003872
COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness for Enlisted Members) states Soldiers must make sure their financial accounts are correct. The fact that the applicant was not found guilty of stealing, falsifying documents, or committing other criminal activities to obtain the overpayments has no bearing on whether he was overpaid.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004856
The applicant provides: * memorandum requesting sponsorship, dated 14 March 2007 * Orders 191-12, dated 9 July 2008 * Carlson Wagonlit travel itinerary/invoice, dated 29 July 2008 * DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), dated 11 August 2008 * DA Form 5960, dated 11 August 2008 * DD Form 2367, dated 11 August 2008 * Orders 301-02, dated 27 October 2008 * letter from the Darton College Office of the Registrar, dated 5 October 2010 * Account summary from Midland Mortgage Company, dated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015207
He provided a letter from DFAS informing him on 23 December 2009 that he had a debt from his active duty military pay account for overpayment of military pay or allowances related to his BAH (VHA) entitlement for the period 30 May 2008 to 10 June 2009. This form would then allow DFAS to correct his active duty military pay account to show he was entitled to BAH (VHA) for Hawaii from 9 February to his date of separation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01739
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was commissioned an officer in the Reserve of the Air Force on 7 February 1997. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPPRS recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01057
Based on the available records, the applicant was approved for CRSC; however, the effective date of 1 Jun 03, was in error, resulting in an overpayment of $855. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jun 06. NOVEL Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-01057 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...