Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03984
Original file (BC-2002-03984.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-03984
            INDEX CODE: 128.14
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be reimbursed in the amount of $99.00 for premiums paid  on  her  Family
Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was not notified on 1 November 2001 that there was  a  change.   If  she
had known of the change and that it affected her and her spouse,  she  would
have declined coverage.

In support of her application, the applicant submits a copy  of  her  Family
Coverage Election form, dated 4 October 2002; and a copy of  her  leave  and
earnings statement, dated 1-30 November 2002.   The  applicant’s  submission
is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving on active  duty  in  the  rank  of  staff
sergeant (E-5).  Her  Total  Active  Federal  Military  Service  Date  is  1
October 1997.

On 4 October 2002, the applicant declined  FSGLI  coverage  on  SGLV  8286A,
Family Coverage Election.
_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPW  recommends  the  application  be  denied.   On  16  January  2003,
AFPC/DPW notified the  applicant  that  they  were  unable  to  process  her
application without additional documentation.  DPW requested a copy  of  her
leave and earnings statement for the period of the  alleged  error  and  any
documentation  to  support  her  claim.   The  applicant  did  not  respond;
therefore, DPW indicates the applicant  has  not  provided  the  information
needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim.  The DPW evaluation  is  attached
at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  20
March 2003 for review and response (Exhibit  C).   As  of  this  date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The applicant was properly charged with  a
debt as a result  of  the  passage  of  Public  Law  106-419,  Section  312,
effective 1 April 2001, which automatically  increased  the  level  of  SGLI
coverage.  Since the applicant did not provide  the  additional  information
requested in order to sufficiently evaluate her claim,  it  is  our  opinion
that no basis exists to reimburse the  premiums  withheld.   Therefore,  the
applicant’s request is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

           Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chairman
           Mr. Jackson Hauslein Jr., Member
           Mr. Edward Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR  Docket  Number
BC-2002-03984:





   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Dec 02, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Letters, ARPC/DPW, dated 20 Mar 03, w/atch.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 03.




                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03862

    Original file (BC-2002-03862.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, she went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that she did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02449

    Original file (BC-2003-02449.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 June 2003, the applicant declined FSGLI coverage on SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election. The applicant’s Leave and Earnings Statement dated for the month of May 2003, indicates a total debt of $360 for FSGLI premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 April 2003. DPW states that in accordance to public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 30 June 2003.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00128

    Original file (BC-2003-00128.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Aviano MPF told her there was no way to recover this money. Applicant paid FSGLI premiums from August 2002 to November 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01393

    Original file (BC-2003-01393.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support her claim. Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. The HQ AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00548

    Original file (BC-2003-00548.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00548 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for premiums paid on her Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) as of 1 November 2001. DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02974

    Original file (BC-2003-02974.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated despite what the OTS personnel stated she had provided the Board with only information she was given regarding the SGLI program. She states that had she seen the FSGLI premiums being deducted from her pay, she would have taken action to decline coverage. _________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02748

    Original file (BC-2003-02748.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided copies of her Leave and Earning Statement (LES) for the period December 2002 through February 2003 The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPW indicates that the applicant failed to respond to their 26 September 2003 letter, requesting additional documentation to evaluate her claim. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00179

    Original file (BC-2003-00179.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-00179 in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00665

    Original file (BC-2003-00665.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. The applicant married an active duty member of the Army on 2 August 2001. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00638

    Original file (BC-2003-00638.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of his SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support his claim. Since the applicant did not provide the additional information requested in order to sufficiently evaluate his claim, it is our opinion that no basis exists to reimburse the premiums withheld. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...