Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04019
Original file (BC-2002-04019.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-04019
                                       INDEX CODE:  108.00
    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         COUNSEL: HELEN L. CORNELL

    XXXXXXXXXXXXX                       HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His honorable discharge from the Tennessee Air National Guard (ANG)  be  set
aside,  and  he  be  awarded  compensation  for  his  undetermined  service-
connected condition retroactive to his date of discharge, 11 February  1983.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Although he left the  military  for  medical  reasons,  which  were  service
connected, he has never received the medical military compensation to  which
he is entitled.

In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his NGB Form  22,
Report of Separation and Record  of  Service,  and  AF  Form  422,  Physical
Profile  Serial  Report.   The   applicant’s   complete   submission,   with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 1 April 1968, the applicant was drafted and entered the Regular  Army  at
the age of 19.  He was released from  active  duty  on  31  March  1970  and
entered the Army Reserve on 1  April  1970.   The  applicant  completed  his
reserve obligation with the Army on 11 January 1972.  On  12  January  1972,
the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in  the  grade  of  sergeant
for a period of four years.  He was honorably released from active  duty  on
20 November 1972 under the provisions of AFM 39-10 for  the  convenience  of
the government.  At that time, he was credited with a total of 2  years,  10
months and 9 days of active duty service.  On 21 November 1972, he  enlisted
in the Air National Guard and Reserve of the Air Force for six years in  the
grade of sergeant (E-4).  He was progressively  promoted  to  the  grade  of
technical sergeant effective and with a date of  rank  of  1  October  1980.
The applicant became an Air  Reserve  Technician,  which  required  that  he
maintain his active Reserve participation  while  working  in  a  government
civil  service  position.   On  11  February   1983,   the   applicant   was
administratively separated due to medical disqualification  for  non-service
connected depression.  He was credited with 12 years, 8 months  and  9  days
of satisfactory Federal service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied.  The  BCMR
Medical Consultant states that a review of the applicant’s  medical  records
show that the  applicant  had  no  significant  health  issues  until  1979.
During a periodic physical exam on 15 August 1977, the applicant reported  a
“nervous condition.”  He was currently undergoing  a  divorce.   During  his
next periodic physical examination on 5 August 1978, the applicant  reported
no problems.  The applicant was hospitalized for “reactive depression”  8-16
August 1979 and 8-22 September 1979.  Following the  1979  hospitalizations,
the applicant participated in Alcoholics  Anonymous.   The  BCMR  Consultant
states that according to the applicant’s Air  National  Guard  Point  Credit
Summary, the applicant was not on active duty status at the time of his  two
1979 hospitalizations.  The applicant was again hospitalized on  1  November
1982, for anxiety after isolating himself in his apartment  for  two  weeks,
not going to work and drinking heavily (history reported by the  applicant’s
Mother obtained from the 4 November 1982  Parthenon  Social  History  Update
report).  The BCMR Consultant states that according to the  applicant’s  Air
National Guard Point Summary, the applicant was not on  active  duty  during
his 1982 hospitalization.  On 24 November 1982, the  applicant  underwent  a
Medical Evaluation  Board  (MEB)  that  concluded  his  depression  was  not
incurred   while   entitled   to   basic   pay   and   recommended   medical
disqualification and administrative discharge  (not  disability  discharge).
The State Air Surgeon and National Guard Bureau Air Surgeon  concurred  with
the  MEB’s  conclusions  and  recommendation.   There  is   no   information
regarding disability benefits the applicant received through civil  service.


The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant  filed  a  claim  with
the  Department  of  Veterans  Affairs  (DVA)  for  service  connection  for
depression in November 1982; however, his  request  was  denied  in  January
1983.  In subsequent years the applicant has been repeatedly denied  service
connected disability compensation by  the  DVA  for  Post  Traumatic  Stress
Disorder related to his Army service in Vietnam.

The BCMR Medical Consultant summarizes  the  applicant  developed  recurrent
depression  with  associated  alcohol  abuse  beginning  in  1979  requiring
hospitalization.  The applicant recovered  from  his  first  bout  that  was
related to marital and job stress.  His  hospitalization  in  November  1982
for recurrent depression, again related to marital and job stress,  lead  to
his medical disqualification for continued service in the ANG.   It  is  the
BCMR Medical Consultant’s opinion that since  his  recurrent  depression,  a
chronic illness, was not proximately caused  by  active  duty  and  did  not
occur while on active duty receiving basic  pay,  he  is  not  eligible  for
disability compensation by the Air  Force.  The  BCMR  Medical  Consultant’s
evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPPD recommends the application  be  denied.   The  applicant  has  not
provided any evidence to show an injustice  occurred  at  the  time  of  his
involuntary discharge from the ANG that would  justify  his  entitlement  to
compensation for a service-connected medical condition.   DPPD  states  that
AFR 35-4, Chapter 8, dated 12 September 1980, in effect at the time  of  the
applicant’s ANG service, states that non-regular  members  whose  disability
was not incurred or  diagnosed  while  performing  active  duty,  full  time
training duty, or active duty for training under a  call  that  specified  a
period of more than 30 days, were ineligible for processing  by  a  Physical
Evaluation Board (PEB) under this  regulation.   Service  members  who  were
evaluated  and  found  unfit  by  the  medical   facility   commander   were
appropriately processed as a non-medical  discharge  under  the  appropriate
USAFR or ANG directive.  It is DPPD’s opinion  that  since  the  applicant’s
unfitting medical condition was not incurred or diagnosed while on  military
orders, he did not qualify for processing  under  military  disability  laws
and policy established in AFR 35-4.  DPPD concurs with the overall  comments
and  recommendation  in  the  BCMR  Medical  Consultant’s  evaluation.   The
AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 30 May 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were  forwarded  to  the
applicant for review  and  comment.   As  of  this  date,  this  office  has
received no response (Exhibit E).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The evidence provided  does  not  persuade
us that an injustice occurred at the time the  applicant  was  involuntarily
discharge from the Air National Guard that would justify his entitlement  to
compensation for a service-connected medical condition.  It is  our  opinion
that since no evidence  has  been  provided  showing  that  the  applicant’s
unfitting medical condition was incurred  or  diagnosed  while  on  military
orders, he does not qualify for processing under  military  disability  laws
or regulations.  There is no indication in his records that the  actions  or
findings surrounding his involuntary discharge were contrary  to  regulation
or accepted medical principles or  that  he  was  treated  differently  from
other members  in  similar  circumstances.   We  therefore  agree  with  the
assessments by the Air Force advisories and adopt  their  rationale  as  the
basis for  our  decision.   Accordingly,  the  applicant’s  request  is  not
favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 23 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
            Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Member
            Mr. Mike Novel, Member

The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR  Docket  Number  BC-2003-04019
was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Dec 02, with attachments.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 28 Apr 03.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 27 May 03.
      Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 03.




                                        ROBERT S. BOYD
                                        Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01368

    Original file (BC-2006-01368.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 November 2004, he was notified he would not be reenlisted in the ANG and that his AGR tour would end concurrent with his date of separation of 6 April 2005. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommended denial. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 2 May 07 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 May 07.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03911

    Original file (BC-2003-03911.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of his medical records failed to show that his back injury was sustained on 12 Nov 65 as a result of a missile motor slipping its cradle during assembly in support of combat training missions. The Medical Consultant states a single medical record entry indicates he presented for lumbosacral back pain on 12 Nov 65 but no mechanism of injury is documented and there are no work-site accident or injury reports present in the records that may provide additional information. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01560

    Original file (BC-2003-01560.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding of EPTS and recommends a change of records to show a disability discharge for Bulimia Nervosa at 10 percent. The decision to process a member through the military DES is determined by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) when he or she is determined disqualified for continued military service. Based on the assessment by the BCMR Medical Consultant, it appears probable that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01026

    Original file (BC-2002-01026.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied. Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03182

    Original file (BC-2002-03182.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was allowed to transfer from active duty Air Force to the Air National Guard (ANG) with a medical condition that was incurred while on active duty. DPPD states that based on the preponderance of the available evidence it appears that the applicant was reasonably capable of performing his military duties as an AGE mechanic up until the time of his active duty discharge. We took notice of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01238

    Original file (BC-2003-01238.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 5 Feb 01, the Air Force PEB recommended that the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with severance pay with a combined disability rating of 10 percent. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 19 Sep 03 for review and comment within 30 days. It is our opinion that because of the severity of his condition...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03095

    Original file (BC-2003-03095.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 March 2000, the applicant submitted her rebuttal letter to SAFPC requesting a disability retirement, with a compensable disability rating of 40 percent. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The BCMR Medical Consultant summarized the information contained in the applicant’s personnel and medical records and is of the opinion that the preponderance of the evidence of the record supports a disability rating of 20 percent. A complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01056

    Original file (BC-2002-01056.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFBCMR Medical Consultant stated that, at the time of separation from active duty with the Regular Air Force, the applicant’s left knee condition was not “unfitting” for continued active military service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The additional advisory opinion is provided following review of the previous AFBCMR action granting the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0101208

    Original file (0101208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her complete submission is at Exhibit A. Her records indicate she is currently being compensated by the DVA (see Exhibit D). Had it been determined that she was found unfit for continued military service while performing her initial active duty training, which is a distinctively separate issue, Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) processing would have been appropriate.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01707

    Original file (BC-2002-01707.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His medical records include two physical examinations, one completed on 31 October 1946 at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army, and another completed 22 August 1952 during his active duty period in the U.S. Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this case for a second time and determined that action and disposition in this case are proper and equitable reflecting compliance...