AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03767
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 30 May 03 for review and response. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was given an entry level separation for misconduct as a result of his receiving an Article 15, four LORs, and counseling. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03768
In support of his application, he provides a document that details point requirements for promotion in the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR) and a copy of his point summary. On 14 January 1953, Air Force Reserve Order Number 9 terminated the applicant’s commission effective 1 April 1953. Air Force Regulation (AFR) 45-5, Organizational Composition, and Assignment, Promotion, Transfer and Retention of Officers, dated 16 March 1946, details the full requirements for promotion in the USAFR.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03769
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC2002-03769 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military personnel records show that he served one day in Vietnam. He indicates that he served in the Vietnam War; however, his records show no service in Vietnam. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03770
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His dental work, done while on active duty was not completed. DPPI notes that the -- ANG maintains that the applicant was a “no show” for at least four of his dental appointments during his active duty tour. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03771
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Mr. Laurence M. Groner, and Mr. Mike Novel considered this application on March 10, 2003. DAVID W. MULGREW Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dtd January 28, 2003, with attachment AFBCMR 02-03771 INDEX CODE:...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03773
In accordance with public law, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,00 for the period 1 November 2001 - 30 November 2002. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for the SGLI premiums he paid from November 2001 to November 2002. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03774
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time he was considered for PV promotion, the citation to accompany the award of the MSM was missing from his selection record. In view of this, and since the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act does not provide ARPC the authority to hold Special Selection Boards (SSBs) for PV promotion boards, we recommend his records, to include the MSM citation, be considered for promotion to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03775
They indicated that the applicant contends the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) failed to provide counseling regarding a pending SRB change. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 10 December 2002. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 December 2002.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03776
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03776 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Recommendation for Decoration Printout (RDP) date for the Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM) he was awarded be changed from 21 January 2003 to 29 April 2002. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPWB recommends the application be denied,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03779
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member decline coverage. As of this...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03786
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03667 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. During her time in the Air Force, she took her duties seriously and endeavored to excel. AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03787 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He was found guilty and sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for 32 months, reduction in grade to airman basic (E-1) and forfeiture of all pay...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03789
As such, he was given an RE code of 4D. (Exhibit C) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 March 2003 for review and response within 30 days. The applicant’s assigned RE code of 4D accurately reflects that at the time of his separation he was serving in the grade of senior airman, he had at least nine years of active military service, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03790
In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of a letter of appreciation, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and a Certificate of Appreciation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 21 Feb 03 for review and response. As of this date, no response...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03795
He further indicated that if she needed the money faster, she should find alternate funds and request a cancellation of the REDUX bonus. On 23 August 2002 applicant elected to accept and receive the High-3/REDUX retirement option, which resulted in her receiving a $30,000 lump-sum bonus upon reaching her 15-year point of active service. Once a member makes an election, the choice is irrevocable as stated on the DD Form 2839, CSB Election, Section IV, #12, “…I understand that once the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03796
On 14 Mar 01, the Board considered and denied an application pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that his dishonorable discharge be upgraded and his court-martial conviction be set aside (Exhibit C). On 12 Jul 96, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) considered whether the assault specifications were “multiplicious” with the unpremeditated murder charge. A complete copy of the AFLSA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03798
INDEX CODE: 100.01 AFBCMR BC-2002-03798 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03799
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant's available military personnel records indicate that he was appointed a second lieutenant, Army of the United States (Air Corps) and entered on active duty on 3 Nov 43. Holland was neutral. SAF/GCI indicated that the instant case involves Holland, a belligerent country, that was occupied by enemy forces at the time of the applicant’s internment.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03800
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant contracted his enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 24 February 1957. On 15 June 1960, the applicant was notified that he was being recommended for discharge due to the Air Force considering him unfit to serve further. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03801
On 20 December 1999, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending he be discharged for fraudulent entry into the Air Force. Then on 1 December 1999, he certified that he had not used any drug, including marijuana, since originally signing the form. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s attorney submitted a letter and states that the crux of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03802
AFBCMR 02-03802 Index Code: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APLLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03804
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03804 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The wife of the former member requests his records be corrected to show he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) Medal. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03805
The complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her response to the Air Force evaluation, applicant reiterates her request to change her DOR to her original active duty date of 1 Jul 00 or in the alternative consideration for her time served in the Air Force Reserve. _____________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03806
On 11 Sep 80, applicant was notified of his commander's intent to vacate the suspended nonjudicial punishment because he again failed to report for duty at the appropriate time. The commander, on 14 Oct 80, determined that applicant was guilty of the offenses and imposed punishment consisting of forfeiture of $224.00 per month for two months, restriction to base for 45 days, and a reduction to the grade of airman basic, with a new date of rank of 14 Oct 80. He had completed a total of 2...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03808
AFBCMR 02-03808 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03811
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03811 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his separation, listed in Block 28 of the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, of Fraudulent Entry into Military Service be changed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03812
For this misconduct, he received an LOR dated 9 February 2001. For this misconduct, he received an LOR dated 14 February 2001. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we note that in the 11 months and 2 days that the applicant was on active duty, he received 2 LOCs, 4 LORs, and an Article 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03813
The Discharge Authority approved the separation and ordered a general (under honorable conditions) discharge and applicant was discharged on 20 Nov 81 On 2 May 90, the Air Force Discharge Review Board reviewed and denied the applicant’s request for discharge upgrade. AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03814
AFBCMR 02-03814 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03816
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Mrs. Diane Arnold, and Mr. Michael V. Barbino, considered this application on 28 January 2003. AFBCMR 02-03816 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03817
The Findings and Recommended Disposition of the IPEB dated 13 August 2001 found the applicant unfit for duty and recommended he be discharged with severance pay with a 10% disability rating based on the following: Category I - Unfitting Conditions that are compensable and ratable: bipolar disorder associated with post-traumatic stress disorder. The Board found his medical condition for Bipolar Disorder as unfitting for continued military service and recommended he be discharged with...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03824
In accordance with AFI 36-2504, he should have been transferred from the ADL to the RASL and subsequently promoted to major with an appropriate DOR as an active Reserve officer. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the applicable statutes and regulations were properly applied in determining the applicant's date of rank to the grade...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03826
He receive supplemental consideration for promotion by the CY99A Central Major Selection Board. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPE states the applicant alleges his DAFSC, Duty Title, Key Duty description and the first bullet of Section IV of his PRF that was reviewed by the central selection board were incorrect. The applicant has not provided any documentation that the correct duty information was not considered during the PRF process.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03827
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records, to include a corrected Officer’s Selection Brief (OSB), receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of major for the Calendar Year 2002A and 2002B Selection Boards. Although the applicant attempted...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03828
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03828 INDEX CODE: 111.02 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 26 July 2000 through 11 June 2001 and all accompanying attachments be declared void and he be considered for promotion by a special selection board (SSB). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03829
Her problems were incompatible with military service and her past medical history included a variety of pelvic and gynecological conditions that were estimated to be present for three years and would likely be the source of her pelvic pain. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant notes that, although the MEB indicated the applicant’s conditions had not EPTS, the IPEB concluded otherwise. The Consultant gives a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03831
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS INDEX CODE 102.06 113.00 135.00 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2002-03831 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) be adjusted from 19 Apr 73 to 22 Feb 78 by allowing him to resign his US Air Force Reserve (USAFR) commission on 30 Jun 79 and reappointing him on 4 May 84, thereby...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03832
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03832 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reenlistment eligibility (RE) code reflected on his DD Form 214 be changed to allow him to return to active duty. DPPAES further states the reenlistment eligibility code "4D" is the applicable code for a member whose grade is...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03839
AFBCMR 02-03839 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03840
INDEX CODE 121.03 AFBCMR 02-03840 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03841
He received records of counseling on six occasions (11 Aug 82, 5 and 6 Jan 83, 4 May 83, and 10 and 11 May 83) for failure to meet AFR 39-6 Responsibilities. After reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s overall quality of service and the events which precipitated his separation from the Air Force, we find no evidence to indicate that either the assigned separation code or the RE code are in error or unjust. ___________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03845
JA states that, according to the AFOATS Form 22 (Cadet Personnel Action Request), the applicant’s Undergraduate Pilot Slot (UPT) slot was revoked, not solely due to his failure of the physical fitness test (PFT), but because the applicant’s performance within the AFROTC program was below what is expected of potential Air Force pilots. The applicant has not submitted sufficient evidence of probable material error or injustice to warrant any action. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03848
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Applicant's Master...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03849
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Applicant's Master...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03858
A 29 September 1972 medical record entry, reports the positive urinalysis report and referral for evaluation by mental health. There is no evidence of record that the vet had pronounced neuropsychiatric symptomology or evidence of psychosis while in service.” He appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board in November 1976 and June 1980, both times his applications for upgrade were denied, concluding: “no evidence to substantiate that the applicant was a drug addict, that the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03860
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ANG/DPPI recommends denial of applicant’s request. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03862
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, she went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that she did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03863
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In January 2002, he went to the Customer Service Section at the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) in Keflavik, Iceland, to decline the spousal portion of the new FSGLI coverage. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant explained that he did not respond to AFPC/DPW’s request for additional documentation because there was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03867
He was never given a physical prior to his discharge from the Air Force. He had served 2 years, 7 months and 13 days on active duty. Evidence of record and medical examinations prior to separation from the Air Force indicate the applicant was fit and medically qualified for continued military service, retention or appropriate separation and did not have any physical or mental defects which would have warranted consideration in the Disability Evaluation System.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03869
His Officer Selection Record (OSR) prepared for the CY01A Colonel Selection Board be corrected to include award of the Meritorious Service Medal, Second Oak Leaf Cluster, (MSM, 2OLC) for the period 1 July 1998 to 9 July 2001 and that he receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of colonel for the Calendar Year CY01A Selection Board. At the time the CY01A Colonel Board convened (22 October 2001), the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) did not...