Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03773
Original file (BC-2002-03773.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-03773

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be reimbursed for Family  Servicemember’s  Group  Life  Insurance  (SGLI)
premiums he paid for the period of  1  November  2001  through  30  November
2002.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He did not elect to receive SGLI for his spouse.  There is no record of  the
coverage for this insurance in his records at the military personnel  flight
(MPF).  This was an allotment taken out as a  discretionary  allotment.   It
did not say SGLI allotment.  This is very confusing

In support of his request, applicant provided copies of his LES, a  copy  of
SGLV 8286A, letters and emails  from  AFPC/DPW/DPMPC/DPWCS/  and  DPMP,  and
newspaper articles.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant is currently serving on active duty in the Air Force in the  grade
of staff sergeant.

Documents provided by applicant indicate that on  1  November  2001,  Family
Servicemembers’  Group  Life  Insurance  was  implemented.   Deductions  for
coverage in the amount of $100,000 continued to be taken from his pay  until
approximately 30 November 2002.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPW recommended denial of the applicant’s request and  states  that  it
is their opinion that the Lackland AFB leadership  took  adequate  steps  as
directed to inform all members of this new program and  that  the  applicant
had adequate time between         1 November 2001 and 31  December  2001  to
make an election decision. Additionally, the applicant did not  provide  any
documentation  to  indicate  he  was  not  aware  of  this  change  and  his
responsibility to make an election.  In  accordance  with  public  law,  the
applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,00 for the period 1 November 2001  -
30 November 2002.  Had the applicant’s spouse become a fatality during  this
period, the proceeds of the $100,000 coverage would have been  paid  to  him
IAW 38 U.S.C. 1970.

AFPC/DPW complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 28 March 2003, for review and response.  As of  this  date,  no  response
has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an  error  or  injustice.   After  a  thorough  review  of  the
evidence of record and applicant’s submission,  we  are  not  persuaded  the
applicant should be reimbursed for the SGLI premiums he paid  from  November
2001 to November 2002.  Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however,  we
do not find these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently  persuasive
to override the rationale provided by the office of primary  responsibility.
 We therefore agree  with  their  recommendation  and  adopt  the  rationale
expressed as the basis for our decision that the  applicant  has  failed  to
sustain his burden of having suffered either an error or an  injustice.   In
view of the above and absent persuasive evidence to the  contrary,  we  find
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2002-03773
in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Jackson Hauslein, Jr., Member
                 Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:


      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Nov 02, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPW, dated 14 Mar 03.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 03.





      JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00206

    Original file (BC-2003-00206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPW complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 March 2003, for review and response. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for the SGLI premiums he paid from November 2001 to October 2002. Exhibit D. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00665

    Original file (BC-2003-00665.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. The applicant married an active duty member of the Army on 2 August 2001. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03709

    Original file (BC-2002-03709.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Apparently, Mountain Home AFB had failed to enter a code in their records to show joint spouse and exemption from SGLI spouse coverage. There is no declination statement in the member’s record. No premiums were deducted from her pay until she arrived at Laughlin AFB in September 2002.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02212

    Original file (BC-2002-02212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14, established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02213

    Original file (BC-2002-02213.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02213 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for the Family Member Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from her pay during the period from 1 November 2001 through 28 February 2002. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. On 5 June 2001,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02563

    Original file (BC-2002-02563.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Members who had elected no coverage or less than $250,000 coverage prior to 1 April 2001, could avoid the higher premiums provided they completed a new election form in April 2001. No evidence has been submitted showing that the applicant declined coverage during the month of April 2001. We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that no basis exists to reimburse the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03034

    Original file (BC-2002-03034.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03034 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums he paid for the period of 1 November 2001 through 30 September 2002. Due to the recent emails concerning this particular item, neither his wife nor he wishes to add any more...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00134

    Original file (BC-2004-00134.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They indicated Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and the applicant had adequate time to make an election decision. In accordance with public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 to present. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02747

    Original file (BC-2003-02747.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They indicated that Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and that the applicant had adequate time prior to his deployment to make an election decision. In accordance with public law, although premiums had not yet been deducted from his pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 May 2003. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02783

    Original file (BC-2003-02783.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse or child(ren), unless the member declined coverage. Although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 - 30 June 2003. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...