Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03775
Original file (BC-2002-03775.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-03775
            INDEX CODE:  128.05

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be given a constructive reenlistment to qualify for  a  higher  Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reenlistment bonus was changed from a 1.0  to  a  2.0  approximately  20
days after his reenlistment.  He would like to change his reenlistment  date
to 30 January 2002 in order to take advantage  of  the  higher  reenlistment
bonus.  He understands this will extend his active duty  service  commitment
(ADSC) to 30 January 2008.

In  support  of  his  appeal,  the  applicant  provided  an  AF  Form   901,
Reenlistment Eligibility Annex to DD Form 4, dated 4  January  2002  and  an
Enlistment/Reenlistment Document of the Armed Forces of the  United  States,
dated 27 December 2001.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force was on  24  June
1994 in the grade of airman basic for a period of four (4) years.

The applicant reenlisted on 29 August 1997, in the grade  of  senior  airman
for a period of four (4) years.

On 2 August 2001, the applicant requested  an  extension  to  his  29 August
1997 enlistment to complete the weight management program (WMP).

On 10 August 2001, his request was approved and his date of  separation  was
extended from 28 August 2001 to 28 December 2001.

The applicant contracted his last enlistment  on  27  December  2001  for  a
period of six (6) years in the grade of staff sergeant.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAE recommended denial.  They indicated that the  applicant  contends
the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) failed to provide  counseling  regarding
a pending SRB change.  On 17 January 2002, HQ USAF released a new  SRB  list
and announced that affected personnel should be briefed.  The window to  get
the SRB recomputed was if a member reenlisted between 2 January 2002 and  16
January 2002.  The SRB review had not been announced  as  of  the  date  the
applicant reenlisted and therefore  the  MPF  was  not  able  to  brief  the
applicant it had changed.

The evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 20 December 2002, a copy of the Air Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to
the applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days.  As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence  of  an  error  or  an   injustice   warranting   a   constructive
reenlistment to qualify for  a  Selective  Reenlistment  Bonus  (SRB).   The
applicant contends that the SRB was changed approximately 20 days after  his
reenlistment; however, he believed the reenlistment bonus would  not  change
since the new fiscal year had started.  The Board notes that  on  29  August
1997, the applicant reenlisted for  a  period  of  four  (4)  years  and  on
2 August 2001, he extended his enlistment for a period  of  four  (4) months
in order to complete the weight management program (WMP),  thereby  changing
his DOS from 28 August 2001 to  28 December  2001.   Therefore,  he  had  no
other choice but to reenlist on 27 December 2001 or leave active  duty.   As
a result, when the Air Force announced the new SRB on 17  January  2002,  he
was ineligible to have his SRB recomputed because he had  reenlisted  before
2 January 2002.  The Board is not persuaded that he has established that  he
has been the victim of either an error or injustice.  The window to get  the
SRB recomputed was if a member reenlisted between  2  January  2002  and  16
January 2002.  It is apparent that the applicant could not have  elected  to
reenlist within that window to receive the new SRB because  the  SRB  review
had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and  the  MPF
was not able to brief the applicant  it  had  changed.   Therefore,  in  the
absence of evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  02-03775
in Executive Session on 20 February 2003, under the provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                  Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
                  Ms. Mary J. Johnson, Member
                  Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 November 2002, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 10 December 2002.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 December 2002.




                                RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202124

    Original file (0202124.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. However, we have been advised by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) that the applicant’s Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was affected by the STOP LOSS program which was in effect at the time. Therefore, had he not reenlisted in December 2001, he would not have been allowed to separate on January 13, 2002; rather, an extension of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02258

    Original file (BC-2002-02258.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the member reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief this member it had changed. The SRB review had not been announced as of the date member reenlisted and therefore the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was not able to brief this member it had changed. The applicant has not provided documentary evidence that he was miscounseled that his deployed location would not have such personnel.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201315

    Original file (0201315.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01315 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of reenlistment be changed from 11 December 2001 to 29 January 2002 to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The applicant reenlisted on 11 December 2001 before the SRB review had been announced...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200533

    Original file (0200533.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The window to get the SRB recomputed was if member reenlisted between 2 January 2002 and 16 January 2002. The window to get the SRB recomputed was if a member reenlisted between 2 January 2002 and 16 January 2002. If the applicant could provide evidence to the fact that he was miscounseled to reenlist on the 1st, outside of the window, the Board would reconsider reviewing his request again.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200680

    Original file (0200680.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00680 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment date of 1 Jan 02 be changed to 2 Jan 02 in order to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitlement. The HQ AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200782

    Original file (0200782.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00782 INDEX CODE 112.07 128.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment on 9 November 2001 be voided and a constructive reenlistment request of 20 January 2002 be granted to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00021

    Original file (BC-2003-00021.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-00021 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1 January 2002 reenlistment be changed to 19 January 2002, which will entitle him to a higher selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). The SRB review had not been announced as of the date he reenlisted and therefore, the MPF was not able...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01643

    Original file (BC-2002-01643.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He reenlisted with an SRB of 2 and while deployed the SRB changed to 3. He was honorably discharged on 17 January 2002 and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force for a period of four (4) years and five (5) months on 18 January 2002; and, at the time of his reenlistment of 18 January 2002, he was entitled to a Zone A, Multiple three (3) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). He was honorably discharged on 17 January 2002 and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 January 2002, for a period...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02994

    Original file (BC-2002-02994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She reenlisted on 18 December 2001 in zone A for a 1.5 multiple SRB. The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application, AFBCMR Docket No.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02994

    Original file (BC-2002-02994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She reenlisted on 18 December 2001 in zone A for a 1.5 multiple SRB. The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application, AFBCMR Docket No.