Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200956
Original file (0200956.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-00956
            INDEX NUMBER:  110.00
      XXXXXXXXX  COUNSEL:  None
AKA:  XXXXXXXXXX

      XXX-XX-XXXX      HEARING DESIRED:  No

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Block 28 of his DD Form  214,  “Narrative  Reason  For  Separation”  be
changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Secretarial Authority.”

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His condition was service related and no longer exists.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2  Aug  95  for  six
years.  A resume of his Enlisted Performance Reports follows:

      Closeout Date                     Overall Rating
        1 Apr 97                        5
       26 Feb 98                        5
       26 Feb 99                        5
       26 Feb 00                        4
       26 Feb 01                        2

The remaining facts relevant to  this  application  are  found  in  the
evaluations prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force  found
at Exhibit C and D.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends that the applicant’s request  be
denied.

Following initiation of non-judicial punishment for failure to go,  the
applicant was  hospitalized  17  Nov  00  for  anxiety  and  depressive
symptoms and was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder.   He  had  been
having symptoms of anxiety and depressed mood for a few years  but  the
stress of work and  a  recent  divorce  increased  his  symptoms.   The
inpatient psychiatrist recommended administrative separation,  but  the
applicant’s commander decided  to  retain  him  on  active  duty.   His
symptoms worsened and he was diagnosed with major depression by Feb 01.
 He underwent a Medical Evaluation Board in Feb 01 and in  Mar  01  the
Physical  Evaluation  Board  (PEB)  returned  him  to   duty   with   a
recommendation for administrative processing since  his  condition  was
unsuiting rather than unfitting.  Shortly after learning of  the  PEB’s
decision, the applicant made a suicidal gesture  and  was  hospitalized
for less than 24  hours.   The  applicant’s  newly  assigned  commander
directed a mental health evaluation.  The applicant was diagnosed  with
an adjustment disorder and personality disorder unsuiting for continued
military service.   The  applicant  was  subsequently  administratively
separated from service with an honorable discharge.

The applicant’s records document an adjustment disorder and personality
disorder.  Personality disorders are lifelong patterns of maladjustment
in the individual’s  personality  structure  which  are  not  medically
disqualifying or unfitting, but may render  the  individual  unsuitable
for further military service and may be cause for administrative action
by  the  individual’s  unit  commander.    Adjustment   disorders   are
characterized by marked psychological distress in excess of what  would
be  expected  given  the  nature  of  the  stressors,  and  frequently,
significant  impairment  in  social   and   occupational   functioning.
Symptoms  of  Adjustment  Disorder   are   often,   but   not   always,
manifestation  of  an  underlying  personality  disorder.   Action  and
disposition in this case are proper and equitable reflecting compliance
with Air Force directives that implement the law.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request.  Applicant did
not submit any new evidence identifying any errors or  injustices  that
occurred in the discharge proceedings.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant  on
28 June 2002 for review  and  comment  within  30  days.   To  date,  a
response has not been received.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by  existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits  of  the  case;  however,  we
agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office  of
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of  an  error  or
injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the  contrary,  we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting  the  relief  sought  in
this application.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did   not
demonstrate the existence of material  error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a  personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-00956 in
Executive Session on 21 August 2002, under the provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Panel Chair
      Mr. Mike Novel, Member
      Ms. Marilyn Thomas, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Mar 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant,
                Dated 31 May 02.
    Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 18 Jun 02.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 28 Jun 02.




                                   LAWRENCE R. LEEHY
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03206

    Original file (BC-2002-03206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03206 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The applicant developed symptoms of grief depressed mood while in technical training that was diagnosed as Adjustment Disorder with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03206

    Original file (BC-2002-03206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03206 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The applicant developed symptoms of grief depressed mood while in technical training that was diagnosed as Adjustment Disorder with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02430

    Original file (BC-2004-02430.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The BCMR Medical Consultant does not conclude that the evidence in the service medical records support change of records to show disability discharge for anxiety disorder and notes that the predominant diagnosis interfering with duty at the time was the non-compensable personality disorder. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A response to the Air Force evaluation was provided...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01981

    Original file (BC-2002-01981.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01981 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. Additionally, she provided no facts warranting a change...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01632

    Original file (BC-2005-01632.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They also noted the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, or provide any facts warranting a change to her reenlistment eligibility code. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant opined that no change in the records is warranted. A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200044

    Original file (0200044.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The current AFI that regulates separations for mental health problems does not allow coding for other than “Personality Disorder,” an entirely different DSM-IV code sequence from that with which the applicant was diagnosed. Based on the evidence provided, DPPRS recommends changing block 28 on his DD 214 from "Personality Disorder" to "Secretarial Authority" with a Separation Program designator of "JFF" (Exhibit E). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03361

    Original file (BC-2002-03361.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03361 INDEX CODE: 100.02, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C and his reason for separation (Personality Disorder) be changed. They further agreed with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant and recommended the separation code and narrative reason...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03005

    Original file (BC-2002-03005.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was separated with an honorable discharge on 28 January 1997 by reason of “Personality Disorder” with a Separation Code of JFX and a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C, (involuntary separation with honorable discharge). The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates he took the easy way out at discharge time. Therefore, we recommend that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03983

    Original file (BC-2002-03983.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03983 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and separation code be changed. The AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS concurs with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant and recommends the applicant’s separation code...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01172

    Original file (BC-2003-01172.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01172 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed. She was assigned a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation...