Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00511-99
Original file (00511-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:lc
Docket No: 5 1 l-99
25 May 1999

: USN

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 7 April 1999, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
m

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY  PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720  INTEGRITY DRIVE
YILLINDTON  TN 2805 S-0000

1160
NPC-815
07 Apr 99

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via: NPC-OOZCB

Subj 

: BNCR PETITION IC

USN,

Ref:

SNM ’s DD Form 149 dtd 18 Jan 99

(a)
(b) MILPERSMAN 
1160- 100
(c) MILPERSMAN 15 1 O-020

Encl: (1) BCNR File

1.

In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to petitioner

’s request.

- Petitioner received a STAR approval from 
E3 at time of STAR approval.

NPC 815 on 24 09302 Feb 1998. Petitioner was an

- Petitioner reenlisted for four years on 27 Feb 1998 under the STAR program and received a
zone  “A” SRB for this reenlistment. Petitioner was an E3 at the time of reenlistment.

- Petitioner requests to receive automatic advancement to
reenlistment by way of the STAR program benefits.

paygrade E4 effective the date of

 

(b) and (c), automatic advancement under the STAR program is not a

- Per references 
guarantee. Automatic advancement eligibility is based on the Career Schools List in effect on
the date of reenlistment. Additionally, non- AEF E3 personnel at time of STAR reenlistment
are not eligible for automatic advancement under STAR.

2.

In view of the above, recommend petitioner

’s record remain as is.

3. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is returned.

Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00193-99

    Original file (00193-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. - Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 20 Mar 1998 reflect a STAR reenlistment and the automatic advancement benefit under the STAR program for the AN/BQQ-SE Advanced Maintenance and Operations Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT. (l), the STS rating had no schools on the CSL at - Per enclosure However, in reference (b)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00792-99

    Original file (00792-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808650

    Original file (NC9808650.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - Petitioner requests to receive the Petty Officer Second eligibility back by reason of the STAR program. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00332-98

    Original file (00332-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment based on the date of discharge. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99

    Original file (00439-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99

    Original file (00809-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98

    Original file (04116-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate Reference at the time petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99

    Original file (00120-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98

    Original file (08446-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99

    Original file (00752-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.