Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98
Original file (04116-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON, D.C. 203704100

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 4 116-98
9 March 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section  1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on  9 March 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 17 February 1999, a copy of
which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL  COMMAND
MILLINGTON  TN 

INTEDRITY DRIVE

5720 

J8055
-0000

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
Via:

NPC-OOXCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

1160
NPC-815
17  Feb 

99

Ref:

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 12 May 98

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN  
(c) OPNAVINST 

111/96
1160.6A

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval to

- Petitioner was discharged from Active Duty on 09  
Petitioner was in 

after four years of Naval service.
at the time of discharge.

Ott 

1992

paygrade  E3

- Petitioner reenlisted for three years on 06 Aug 1996.

"A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate

Reference 
at the time petitioner reenlisted.

(b) carried zone

- Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement

in reference (b) for the broken-service reenlistment.

- Per reference (c), members with broken-service must be a
Petitioner was an 

petty officer in an  SRB eligible rating/NEC.
are not eligible for broken-service SRB.
upon reenlistment on   06 Aug 1996.
2.
is.
3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
(1) is returned.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by
Enclosure

recommend petitioner's record remain as

Designated strikers
ATAN

In view of the above,

,...

:

Head, 
Reenlistment Incentives Branch

.-



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00332-98

    Original file (00332-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment based on the date of discharge. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00280-99

    Original file (00280-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. servicemembers reenlisting for SRB may receive only However, per - NPC 815 cannot advise petitioner to reenlist at a later date FC(OOO0) rating was "C") because per reference (c), the (for zone not eligible for a zone "C" SRB. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by Enclosure 3. the Board for correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99

    Original file (00120-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06534-98

    Original file (06534-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 1995 the earliest petitioner was eligible to receive the SRB entitlement was 26 Jul...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99

    Original file (00439-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98

    Original file (08446-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99

    Original file (00809-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07921-98

    Original file (07921-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (b) carried a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the RMSS rate at the time petitioner reenlisted.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00381-99

    Original file (00381-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 11 Jul 99. petitioner reenlisted there were no SRB entitlements for the DK(0000) rating per reference (b). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99

    Original file (00752-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.