Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99
Original file (00120-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEh: mh
Docket No: 120-99
25 May 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

l

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
IWTECRITY  DRIVE
Mll.LlNCTOW 
TN 38055-0000

5720 

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
Via:

NPC-OOZCB

1160
NPC-815
14 Apr 99
RECORD

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO DT3

Ref:

(a) SNM'S DD Form 149
(b) NAVADMIN 
(c) NAVADMIN 

047/98
148/98

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference

1.
petitioner's request.

dtd 22 

Dee 98

USN,

(a), recommend disapproval of

- Petitioner reenlisted on 13 Mar 1998 for three years to

attend Dental Technician Prosthetics
8752).
(b) did not carry an SRB entitlement for the DT(8752) rate/NEC at
the time petitioner reenlisted.

Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 06 Apr 1998.

"C" school training (NEC

Reference

- Petitioner completed NEC 8752 training in November 1998.

Reference (c) released on 14 Jul 1998 with an effective date of 01
Aug 1998 carried a zone

"A" SRB entitlement for NEC 8752.

- Petitioner requests to cancel the reenlistment of 13 Mar

1998 and effect an extension through the completion date of the
Prosthetics "C" school training.
to effect a three year reenlistment at the completion of training
to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement in reference (c).

Additionally, petitioner request

- Petitioner was not improperly counseled concerning obliserve

requirements for reasons of SRB at the time of reenlistment
because reference (b) did not carry the entitlement.

In view of the above,

recommend petitioner's record remain as

2.
is.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
Enclosure (1)

3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
is returned.

Head,
Reenlistment Incentives Branch

.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98

    Original file (08446-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08501-98

    Original file (08501-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 Petitioner's - Reference (c), released 20 Nov 1998 with an effective date Dee 1998 carried the zone "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 of 01 at an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99

    Original file (00752-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99

    Original file (00439-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00809-99

    Original file (00809-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Per reference (c), members who reenlisted or extended prior to the DTG of this message are entitled to SRB at the award level Petitioner reenlisted one specified in their approved week prior to the release of reference (c), therefore petitioner is not eligible to the SRB maximum of petitioner was not miscounseled concerning SRB eligibility...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00381-99

    Original file (00381-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner's EAOS at the time was 11 Jul 99. petitioner reenlisted there were no SRB entitlements for the DK(0000) rating per reference (b). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00332-98

    Original file (00332-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. - Petitioner requests to receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement calculated in reference (c) for the broken-service reenlistment based on the date of discharge. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04116-98

    Original file (04116-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for AT(OOOO) rate Reference at the time petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99

    Original file (03281-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03533-99

    Original file (03533-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Petitioner reenlisted on 18 Jun 1998 for 4 years and received the maximum zone "B" SRB...